Posted By: barnacle
I fought the law and... - 04/02/2018 06:30
Well, the local council, which amounts to much the same thing.
A year ago, the council got a bee in its bonnet about introducing a 20mph speed limit on our estate loop road and all the roads leading off it. The main argument put forward was that this would reduce the number of accidents on the road, particularly around two junior schools.
I was opposed to this for a number of reasons, including:
Nonetheless I expected to come home one day to find 20mph signs up at the end of the road.
Imagine my amazement to receive a letter a couple of days ago stating that although those opposed to the idea were in a 40:60 minority, the council had decided *not* to proceed; the limit will remain at 30mph. There was apparently an insufficient majority to justify the change. The council will be repairing the existing traffic calming measures, some of which are in a dreadful state and keep the local garages busy replacing wishbones.
I'm happy about this - not because I'm opposed to speed restrictions where necessary, but because there are, in my humble opinion, far too many cases where 'a lower speed limit' is seen as a cureall for symptoms which may not exist.
There are too many roads, for example, which have previously been derestricted but are now a hodgepodge of 40, 50, and 60mph limits without any rhyme or reason. It is as if the purpose of a road - to allow someone to get from A to B - has been forgotten...
So by all means support 20mph zones and the like where they're useful - where kids are playing in the street, on residential zones which are used as rat runs, where there are frequent accidents attributable to the higher limt (as opposed to accidents where the driver has been moving faster than the limit: if he won't slow down to a higher limit, why would he slow for a lower?) - but fight against creeping restrictions without benefit!
/rant
A year ago, the council got a bee in its bonnet about introducing a 20mph speed limit on our estate loop road and all the roads leading off it. The main argument put forward was that this would reduce the number of accidents on the road, particularly around two junior schools.
I was opposed to this for a number of reasons, including:
- There have been no accidents on this road since at least 2001
- Speeds are already effectively restricted by road humps, and at the schools, one-car chicanes
- Traffic is controlled at the schools by crossing attendents at school entry and exit times
- Speed enforcement is impossible without either a police presence or the installation of police cameras
- A lack of clarity about the extents of 20mph areas
Nonetheless I expected to come home one day to find 20mph signs up at the end of the road.
Imagine my amazement to receive a letter a couple of days ago stating that although those opposed to the idea were in a 40:60 minority, the council had decided *not* to proceed; the limit will remain at 30mph. There was apparently an insufficient majority to justify the change. The council will be repairing the existing traffic calming measures, some of which are in a dreadful state and keep the local garages busy replacing wishbones.
I'm happy about this - not because I'm opposed to speed restrictions where necessary, but because there are, in my humble opinion, far too many cases where 'a lower speed limit' is seen as a cureall for symptoms which may not exist.
There are too many roads, for example, which have previously been derestricted but are now a hodgepodge of 40, 50, and 60mph limits without any rhyme or reason. It is as if the purpose of a road - to allow someone to get from A to B - has been forgotten...
So by all means support 20mph zones and the like where they're useful - where kids are playing in the street, on residential zones which are used as rat runs, where there are frequent accidents attributable to the higher limt (as opposed to accidents where the driver has been moving faster than the limit: if he won't slow down to a higher limit, why would he slow for a lower?) - but fight against creeping restrictions without benefit!
/rant