Fiat Coupe Forum
- Founded by Kayjey & James Northam
- Funded by the Club for the benefit of all owners
Fiat Coupe Club UK
join the club
Fiat Coupe Forum
 
» Announced
    Posting images


» Related sites
    Main club site
    fiatcoupe.net


» External data
    owners listed
 
Who's Online Now
1 registered members (1 invisible), 74 guests, and 5 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums64
Topics112,491
Posts1,328,974
Members1,964
Most Online731
Jan 14th, 2020
Top Posters(All Time)
barnacle 33,105
stan 32,112
Theresa 23,196
bockers 21,059
PeteP 20,794
JimO 17,917
Nigel 17,346
Jim_Clennell 16,600
RSS Feeds
Club Events
Club Information
Track Events
Rolling Road/RWYB
Social Events
Non-UK Events
Coupé Related Chat
Coupé Spotting
Coupé News/Press
Buying/Selling Advice
Insuring a Coupé
Basic FAQ's
How to Guides
Forum Issues
Technical Problems
General Maintenance
Styling
Tuning
Handling
ICE and Alarm
Coupés for Sale
Coupés Wanted
Parts for Sale
Parts Wanted
Group Buys
Business Forum
Other Vehicles for Sale/Wanted
Other Items for Sale/Wanted
Haggling/Offers
Ebay links
Other Cars
Other Websites
General Chat
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Project Cobalt Candy - Discussion #1658060
06/06/2022 20:29
06/06/2022 20:29
Joined: Aug 2021
Posts: 32
Belfast
G
Golfpro Offline OP
Club Member 1913
Golfpro  Offline OP
Club Member 1913
Discoverer
G

Joined: Aug 2021
Posts: 32
Belfast
Discussion thread if anyone has any queries or chat.

Regards, Simon.


Simon
Re: Project Cobalt Candy - Discussion [Re: Golfpro] #1658377
21/06/2022 10:40
21/06/2022 10:40
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 12,244
Sandhurst
Begbie Offline
Ex El Presidente
Begbie  Offline
Ex El Presidente
I AM a Coop

Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 12,244
Sandhurst
Originally Posted by Golfpro
The Guys have also been investigating the fuelling issue at idle.

My initial thought was that it was overfuelling, but the have tested the AFR and it is actually substantially underfuelled shocked

So we are planning to fit a piggyback ECU and doing a complete adjustment of the fuelling on their dyno.


I wouldn't get a piggyback ECU fitted. There will be a reason for the issue, otherwise you are just masking over the problem by going piggyback, plus piggyback ECU's are so 90's laugh It might be worth speaking to FC Performance to see if they can advise as I believe they mapped the car


Originally Posted by Jonny - After being taken out at Spa
Your car is Usain Bolt with wellies
Re: Project Cobalt Candy - Discussion [Re: Begbie] #1658382
21/06/2022 14:55
21/06/2022 14:55
Joined: Aug 2021
Posts: 32
Belfast
G
Golfpro Offline OP
Club Member 1913
Golfpro  Offline OP
Club Member 1913
Discoverer
G

Joined: Aug 2021
Posts: 32
Belfast
Originally Posted by Begbie
Originally Posted by Golfpro
The Guys have also been investigating the fuelling issue at idle.

My initial thought was that it was overfuelling, but the have tested the AFR and it is actually substantially underfuelled shocked

So we are planning to fit a piggyback ECU and doing a complete adjustment of the fuelling on their dyno.


I wouldn't get a piggyback ECU fitted. There will be a reason for the issue, otherwise you are just masking over the problem by going piggyback, plus piggyback ECU's are so 90's laugh It might be worth speaking to FC Performance to see if they can advise as I believe they mapped the car


My Mapper has already spoken to FC about the car.

It would appear that the issue is probably the lack of mapping points on the original ECU. Because the rev limit was raised it has used up more of the mapping points and has not left enough to fully map the idle and cold start. Also the oversized AFM doesnt help!

Piggyback ECUs have improved hugely in recent years and are now probably more powerful than some of the top end standalone ECUs used in years past cool

Hopefully he will have everything done this week and I will report on the results.


Simon
Re: Project Cobalt Candy - Discussion [Re: Golfpro] #1659079
19/07/2022 08:46
19/07/2022 08:46
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 5,339
Essex
Trappy Offline
Club Member 1834
Trappy  Offline
Club Member 1834
Forum is my life

Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 5,339
Essex
Any chance of a clearer / closer shot of the dyno print out? I can't see rpm points or identify the lines on the graph.


F****** b****** thing...
Re: Project Cobalt Candy - Discussion [Re: Trappy] #1659080
19/07/2022 09:03
19/07/2022 09:03
Joined: Aug 2021
Posts: 32
Belfast
G
Golfpro Offline OP
Club Member 1913
Golfpro  Offline OP
Club Member 1913
Discoverer
G

Joined: Aug 2021
Posts: 32
Belfast
Originally Posted by Trappy
Any chance of a clearer / closer shot of the dyno print out? I can't see rpm points or identify the lines on the graph.


I think his printer was low on black ink rolleyes

The RPM numbers shown on the graph are 4500, 5000, 5500 & 6000. And the rumbers on the MAP and AF are 1000 RPM increments starting with 2000 on the far left.

The car will be going shortly to the Painter for the respray, but once it is finished I will be dropping it back to the garage to get the interior finished off, and I'll get them to do another power run (hopefully when the air temperature is a bit lower).


Simon
Re: Project Cobalt Candy - Discussion [Re: Golfpro] #1659088
19/07/2022 15:02
19/07/2022 15:02
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 5,339
Essex
Trappy Offline
Club Member 1834
Trappy  Offline
Club Member 1834
Forum is my life

Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 5,339
Essex
Originally Posted by Golfpro
Originally Posted by Trappy
Any chance of a clearer / closer shot of the dyno print out? I can't see rpm points or identify the lines on the graph.


I think his printer was low on black ink rolleyes

The RPM numbers shown on the graph are 4500, 5000, 5500 & 6000.


Does that mean we're looking at the following?

200bhp @4,000rpm
255bhp @4,500rpm
370bhp @5,000rpm
455bhp @5,500rpm
508bhp @6,000rpm
515bhp @6,500rpm


F****** b****** thing...
Re: Project Cobalt Candy - Discussion [Re: Trappy] #1659094
19/07/2022 20:32
19/07/2022 20:32
Joined: Aug 2021
Posts: 32
Belfast
G
Golfpro Offline OP
Club Member 1913
Golfpro  Offline OP
Club Member 1913
Discoverer
G

Joined: Aug 2021
Posts: 32
Belfast
Putting a straight edge on the dyno printout I would say:

280bhp @ 4500
375bhp @ 5000
460bhp @ 5500
500bhp @ 6000
510bhp @ 6500

I will get a better printout when we do the final power run after the car has been resprayed.


Simon
Re: Project Cobalt Candy - Discussion [Re: Golfpro] #1659252
25/07/2022 23:34
25/07/2022 23:34
Joined: Aug 2021
Posts: 32
Belfast
G
Golfpro Offline OP
Club Member 1913
Golfpro  Offline OP
Club Member 1913
Discoverer
G

Joined: Aug 2021
Posts: 32
Belfast
Specialist paint bought today. Painter starting tomorrow smile

Attached Files
20220725_163054.jpg (155 downloads)
20220725_162847.jpg (155 downloads)
20220725_162908.jpg (155 downloads)

Simon
Re: Project Cobalt Candy - Discussion [Re: Golfpro] #1659356
01/08/2022 14:02
01/08/2022 14:02
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 17,346
Staffordshire
Nigel Offline
Club Member 123
Nigel  Offline
Club Member 123
Forum veteran

Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 17,346
Staffordshire
One of my biggest worries when selling my Coupe was that it would go to someone who didn't have the money or desire to carry on from where I'd left off. Seems I shouldn't have worried - it would appear it's in good hands and is recieving the attention it deserves (and needs....)

Couple of questions for Simon....

1) Given that a piggyback ECU will only "adapt" parameters of the OE ECU, what is the point of adding another ECU if the problem is not enough mapping points on the OE ECU? Surely the correct solution is to correct the mapping issues by 'fixing' the fuelling.

2) Did your dyno run stop at 6,500rpm for any reason? The engine is built for 7,500rpm (but I think we played safe and put the limiter at 7,300). Surely there's even more power to be had by allowing the engine to rev out more - the turbo is certainly capable of providing boost at those revs

Apologies for the oil cooler - I knew there was a very small oil seep from somewhere, but I thought it was the camcover gasket or the dipstick tube seal

Can't wait to see what it looks like in its new colour.


[Linked Image]
Re: Project Cobalt Candy - Discussion [Re: Nigel] #1659362
01/08/2022 20:28
01/08/2022 20:28
Joined: Aug 2021
Posts: 32
Belfast
G
Golfpro Offline OP
Club Member 1913
Golfpro  Offline OP
Club Member 1913
Discoverer
G

Joined: Aug 2021
Posts: 32
Belfast
Originally Posted by Nigel
One of my biggest worries when selling my Coupe was that it would go to someone who didn't have the money or desire to carry on from where I'd left off. Seems I shouldn't have worried - it would appear it's in good hands and is recieving the attention it deserves (and needs....)

Couple of questions for Simon....

1) Given that a piggyback ECU will only "adapt" parameters of the OE ECU, what is the point of adding another ECU if the problem is not enough mapping points on the OE ECU? Surely the correct solution is to correct the mapping issues by 'fixing' the fuelling.

2) Did your dyno run stop at 6,500rpm for any reason? The engine is built for 7,500rpm (but I think we played safe and put the limiter at 7,300). Surely there's even more power to be had by allowing the engine to rev out more - the turbo is certainly capable of providing boost at those revs

Apologies for the oil cooler - I knew there was a very small oil seep from somewhere, but I thought it was the camcover gasket or the dipstick tube seal

Can't wait to see what it looks like in its new colour.


Hi Nigel,
I'm certainly not an expert in engine mapping so I cant really answer you question regarding how the piggyback solves the issues. All I know is my guys were confident that it would work, and they have been able to solve the cold start issues smile

The changes they have made to your original tune seems generally to be leaning out the fuelling a bit on boost. I remember you saying that your 502HP run had been close to the limit and that fuel had been added back in for safety. My guys have been able to lean it back out to maximise the top end. They are using a hub dyno for mapping which I believe is a huge advantage over a roller dyno (which I assume the car was tuned on for your mapping back in 2012?).

They still have some more adjustments to do. I think they still have to work on the low down torque as their mapping to date has mainly been the top end.

I think the rpm on the printout wasnt configured correctly as they did rev it above 6500. I will get a new graph done when they have the mapping 100% completed.

Im really looking forward to getting the car back from the painter to see how it turns out cool


Simon
Re: Project Cobalt Candy - Discussion [Re: Golfpro] #1659371
02/08/2022 12:11
02/08/2022 12:11
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 17,346
Staffordshire
Nigel Offline
Club Member 123
Nigel  Offline
Club Member 123
Forum veteran

Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 17,346
Staffordshire
Piggyback ECUs were always a 'sticking plaster' solution when the Coupe community first played with them and TBH, they weren't very successful - I spent a lot of money working with a well-known mapper trying to get a Unichip to work properly with the 20VT ECU, but it never ran right.

I'm also not an expert in mapping, so I'm reliant on what I'm told, and the experiences of others. FC Performance disabled some of the safeguards to get the 502bhp figure, which was great for boasting on the forum, but not a great idea for everyday use. Leighton (of FC Performance) always knew that my car was a daily driver and needed to be utterly reliable by making safe power, so we agreed to back it off to a figure that wouldn't be pushing the limits. Yes, it was a roller dyno, so the figures aren't as accurate as a hub dyno.

Regardless - if you've managed to get into the low 500s AND you've sorted some of the mapping issues without having to use an aftermarket ECU, then well done. That said, the cold start issue was never an issue in the summer months, but could occasionally be a pain in the depth of winter.

I'm really chuffed that you're taking the car to the next stage and I'm watching with a lot of interest (and a fair bit of regret from selling it....)


[Linked Image]
Re: Project Cobalt Candy - Discussion [Re: Golfpro] #1659373
02/08/2022 15:20
02/08/2022 15:20
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 5,339
Essex
Trappy Offline
Club Member 1834
Trappy  Offline
Club Member 1834
Forum is my life

Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 5,339
Essex
Originally Posted by Golfpro


I think the rpm on the printout wasnt configured correctly as they did rev it above 6500. I will get a new graph done when they have the mapping 100% completed.



I really hope they do get the dyno calibrated properly when it goes back on with finished mapping as, at the moment, it doesn't bare any resemblence to a dyno print I've ever seen for a 2.0 litre 20vT (even if it is a 2.047cc :P), and I have collated ALL of the FC Performance dynos I can get my hands on, on one spreadsheet nerd In fact it more or less mirrors DLT's non E85 results and that was a 2.5...

As said above, the rpm is off making any results dubious at best and the torque appears to bare no relationship what-so-ever to the power curve.

Get it all calibrated correctly (and the ink filled) and it should prove interesting to see thumb


F****** b****** thing...
Re: Project Cobalt Candy - Discussion [Re: Trappy] #1659374
02/08/2022 15:55
02/08/2022 15:55
Joined: Aug 2021
Posts: 32
Belfast
G
Golfpro Offline OP
Club Member 1913
Golfpro  Offline OP
Club Member 1913
Discoverer
G

Joined: Aug 2021
Posts: 32
Belfast
Originally Posted by Trappy
Originally Posted by Golfpro


I think the rpm on the printout wasnt configured correctly as they did rev it above 6500. I will get a new graph done when they have the mapping 100% completed.



I really hope they do get the dyno calibrated properly when it goes back on with finished mapping as, at the moment, it doesn't bare any resemblence to a dyno print I've ever seen for a 2.0 litre 20vT (even if it is a 2.047cc :P), and I have collated ALL of the FC Performance dynos I can get my hands on, on one spreadsheet nerd In fact it more or less mirrors DLT's non E85 results and that was a 2.5...

As said above, the rpm is off making any results dubious at best and the torque appears to bare no relationship what-so-ever to the power curve.

Get it all calibrated correctly (and the ink filled) and it should prove interesting to see thumb

Yes they will do a proper dyno graph when the mapping is 100% finished.

The printout was really only to show the differences between the before and after.


Simon
Re: Project Cobalt Candy - Discussion [Re: Nigel] #1659376
02/08/2022 16:09
02/08/2022 16:09
Joined: Aug 2021
Posts: 32
Belfast
G
Golfpro Offline OP
Club Member 1913
Golfpro  Offline OP
Club Member 1913
Discoverer
G

Joined: Aug 2021
Posts: 32
Belfast
Originally Posted by Nigel
Piggyback ECUs were always a 'sticking plaster' solution when the Coupe community first played with them and TBH, they weren't very successful - I spent a lot of money working with a well-known mapper trying to get a Unichip to work properly with the 20VT ECU, but it never ran right.

I'm also not an expert in mapping, so I'm reliant on what I'm told, and the experiences of others. FC Performance disabled some of the safeguards to get the 502bhp figure, which was great for boasting on the forum, but not a great idea for everyday use. Leighton (of FC Performance) always knew that my car was a daily driver and needed to be utterly reliable by making safe power, so we agreed to back it off to a figure that wouldn't be pushing the limits. Yes, it was a roller dyno, so the figures aren't as accurate as a hub dyno.

Regardless - if you've managed to get into the low 500s AND you've sorted some of the mapping issues without having to use an aftermarket ECU, then well done. That said, the cold start issue was never an issue in the summer months, but could occasionally be a pain in the depth of winter.

I'm really chuffed that you're taking the car to the next stage and I'm watching with a lot of interest (and a fair bit of regret from selling it....)

It isn't so much that the hub dyno is more accurate (although it should give slightly higher HP figures due to there being no wheelspin power losses and no rotational mass of the wheels), it is the ability to hold the engine at any rpm or load.

So rather than doing multiple 3000 to 7500 rpm pulls, the mapper holds the engine rpm at each rpm/load point and can take his time adding and adjusting fuelling etc to assess the results at each point.


Simon
Re: Project Cobalt Candy - Discussion [Re: Golfpro] #1659412
04/08/2022 08:32
04/08/2022 08:32
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 17,346
Staffordshire
Nigel Offline
Club Member 123
Nigel  Offline
Club Member 123
Forum veteran

Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 17,346
Staffordshire
shocked

You're not skimping, are you?

Attached Files
IMG-20220803-WA0001.jpg (64 downloads)

[Linked Image]
Re: Project Cobalt Candy - Discussion [Re: Nigel] #1659415
04/08/2022 08:45
04/08/2022 08:45
Joined: Aug 2021
Posts: 32
Belfast
G
Golfpro Offline OP
Club Member 1913
Golfpro  Offline OP
Club Member 1913
Discoverer
G

Joined: Aug 2021
Posts: 32
Belfast
Originally Posted by Nigel
shocked

You're not skimping, are you?


As the song goes "if you're going to do it, do it right" smile


Simon
Re: Project Cobalt Candy - Discussion [Re: Golfpro] #1659455
05/08/2022 22:47
05/08/2022 22:47
Joined: Jul 2022
Posts: 14
Hemel Hempstead, Hertfordshire...
Theparrottbros Offline
Newbie
Theparrottbros  Offline
Newbie

Joined: Jul 2022
Posts: 14
Hemel Hempstead, Hertfordshire...
The colour looks amazing! Looking forward to seeing the finished car


Blue 20v Turbo
Handfuls of mk1 Tt’s
Re: Project Cobalt Candy - Discussion [Re: Theparrottbros] #1659456
05/08/2022 23:58
05/08/2022 23:58
Joined: Aug 2021
Posts: 32
Belfast
G
Golfpro Offline OP
Club Member 1913
Golfpro  Offline OP
Club Member 1913
Discoverer
G

Joined: Aug 2021
Posts: 32
Belfast
Originally Posted by Theparrottbros
The colour looks amazing! Looking forward to seeing the finished car

i reaaly dont know how it is going to end up confused

Each photo looks different from the last, but I think it really depends on the light and the angle of the camera.

The base coat is a sparkling metallic silver and the pupleish blue candy has a tiny amount of sparklescent blue pearl in it, so it should look dark purple/blue in the shaded parts, then silvery blue on the flanks where the sun hits it cool


Simon
Re: Project Cobalt Candy - Discussion [Re: Golfpro] #1659609
12/08/2022 10:33
12/08/2022 10:33
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 12,244
Sandhurst
Begbie Offline
Ex El Presidente
Begbie  Offline
Ex El Presidente
I AM a Coop

Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 12,244
Sandhurst
Looking good cool


Originally Posted by Jonny - After being taken out at Spa
Your car is Usain Bolt with wellies
Re: Project Cobalt Candy - Discussion [Re: Begbie] #1659611
12/08/2022 11:15
12/08/2022 11:15
Joined: Aug 2021
Posts: 32
Belfast
G
Golfpro Offline OP
Club Member 1913
Golfpro  Offline OP
Club Member 1913
Discoverer
G

Joined: Aug 2021
Posts: 32
Belfast
Originally Posted by Begbie
Looking good cool

I havent seen the new paint in person yet, but I suspect that the photos dont really do it justice.

The Painter sent me a couple of photos of the car sitting out in the morning sunshine and you can see the effect where the metallic silver bsecoat glimmers through the blue candy cool

Attached Files
IMG-20220811-WA0004.jpg (19 downloads)

Simon

Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.1
(Release build 20190129)
PHP: 7.3.33 Page Time: 0.031s Queries: 17 (0.018s) Memory: 0.8482 MB (Peak: 1.0365 MB) Data Comp: Off Server Time: 2022-08-19 03:00:12 UTC