0 registered members (),
194
guests, and 3
spiders. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums70
Topics113,727
Posts1,340,288
Members1,666
|
Most Online2,346 Apr 14th, 2025
|
|
|
Re: stimated bhp
[Re: pinin_prestatyn]
#413634
12/08/2007 23:48
12/08/2007 23:48
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
So you really think a cat-back gives absolutely no power gain  I guess we need to test this on the rollers. I still say it's worth 5-10BHP easy on a turbocharged car that has 220BHP standard. In relative terms, no. Yes its less restrictive, but bhp is top end power. Is it less restrictive top end? Doubt it. The downpipe and cat are strangling it. It might give more midrange torque. Ross
|
|
|
Re: stimated bhp
[Re: ]
#413636
12/08/2007 23:50
12/08/2007 23:50
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
i think this could go on all day to be honest, some will say yes others will say no. i think until we have figures then all will be speculation.
|
|
|
Re: stimated bhp
[Re: ]
#413638
12/08/2007 23:54
12/08/2007 23:54
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
having looked at the hall of fame i think all coupes will react differently to a cat back depending on the engine health. loads of different mods giving loads of different figures and impossible to gauge what you'll get????
|
|
|
Re: stimated bhp
[Re: ]
#413639
12/08/2007 23:55
12/08/2007 23:55
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
having looked at the hall of fame i think all coupes will react differently to a cat back depending on the engine health. loads of different mods giving loads of different figures and impossible to gauge what you'll get???? Yeah its all on the assumption of a healthy engine. If you take an average of cars with gtech and exhaust its 250bhp. Ross
|
|
|
Re: stimated bhp
[Re: ]
#413640
12/08/2007 23:58
12/08/2007 23:58
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
exactly, like i said my first coupe only had a modded airbox and gave 242bhp!! no other mods.
|
|
|
Re: stimated bhp
[Re: ]
#413641
13/08/2007 00:01
13/08/2007 00:01
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
exactly, like i said my first coupe only had a modded airbox and gave 242bhp!! no other mods. All that really means, is that when you add more mods, it doesnt give as much an increase. I.e adding the gtech wouldnt give you 30bhp more. It would give slightly more than stated 250 but not 30bhp ontop of the 242. Ross
|
|
|
Re: stimated bhp
[Re: Freddan72]
#413648
13/08/2007 00:10
13/08/2007 00:10
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
|
|
|
Re: stimated bhp
[Re: ]
#413742
13/08/2007 02:44
13/08/2007 02:44
|
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 19,939 North wales
pinin_prestatyn
Forum veteran
|
Forum veteran
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 19,939
North wales
|
Yes its less restrictive, but bhp is top end power. Is it less restrictive top end? Doubt it. The downpipe and cat are strangling it. It might give more midrange torque.
Ross
Maybe on a significantly tuned coupe, however the standard downpipe is not going to be strangling that much an otherwise standard coupe I don't reckon.
 Coopless!
|
|
|
Re: stimated bhp
[Re: pinin_prestatyn]
#413746
13/08/2007 02:47
13/08/2007 02:47
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Yes its less restrictive, but bhp is top end power. Is it less restrictive top end? Doubt it. The downpipe and cat are strangling it. It might give more midrange torque.
Ross
Maybe on a significantly tuned coupe, however the standard downpipe is not going to be strangling that much an otherwise standard coupe I don't reckon. Yeah but we are talking about 2 restrictive parts, that were designed for 220bhp, low amount of noise and to pass emissions tests. Ross
|
|
|
Re: stimated bhp
[Re: ]
#413756
13/08/2007 02:56
13/08/2007 02:56
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
|
|
|
Re: stimated bhp
[Re: ]
#413811
13/08/2007 04:15
13/08/2007 04:15
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
well will let you all know at end of month , winner gets a 4 pack
|
|
|
Re: stimated bhp
[Re: ]
#413821
13/08/2007 04:35
13/08/2007 04:35
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
|
|
|
Re: stimated bhp
[Re: ]
#413872
13/08/2007 13:06
13/08/2007 13:06
|
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 8,852 Cambridge & Cotswolds
MeanRedSpider
Je suis un Coupé
|
Je suis un Coupé
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 8,852
Cambridge & Cotswolds
|
The straw thing is an interesting analogy. TBH, it depends upon how big the restrictions are and what the flow of gas is (according so some chap called Bernoulli  ) There will be pressure drop all the way down the exhaust until, pretty much at the end of the exhaust (just past it) it will be at atmosphere. Each bit of pipe (downpipe or cat say) only "sees" the pressure upstream and downstream of it. Any restrictions downstream will limit the pressure drop possible across the component: Flow = function of Pressure Drop. What I'm trying to say (in a very long-winded way) is that the back cat bit will have some impact almost certainly but its effect will be governed by how much of a restriction it is relative to the others. Electronically minded of you can draw parallels with resistors. Voltage is the pressure drop, current is the flow of gas. Hope that helps  Richard Fellow of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers  237 
|
|
|
|