Fiat Coupe Club UK

2017 F1

Posted By: Anonymous

2017 F1 - 28/02/2017 12:56

Lovin' this seasons new tyres..........Back to the Old Skool!

click to enlarge
Posted By: bockers

Re: 2017 F1 - 28/02/2017 13:41

And McClaren engine failures, just like last season frown
Posted By: DaveG

Re: 2017 F1 - 28/02/2017 14:35

Originally Posted By Nello
Lovin' this seasons new tyres..........Back to the Old Skool!
Oh, round, black, and with a hole in the middle cool
Posted By: Dazvr6

Re: 2017 F1 - 28/02/2017 14:57

They need to get rid of those shark fins!
Posted By: Anonymous

Re: 2017 F1 - 28/02/2017 15:08

2016 vs 2017 tongue

click to enlarge
Posted By: Dazvr6

Re: 2017 F1 - 28/02/2017 15:19

Crikey they're a lot bigger than I expected.
Lets hope they produce some spectacular cornering and late braking.
Posted By: Cooperman

Re: 2017 F1 - 28/02/2017 19:49

Drivers will be under some pressure with extra downforce an g impact from what I have read, survival of the fittest on some circuits maybe smile
Posted By: barnacle

Re: 2017 F1 - 01/03/2017 05:41

They miss the point. More mechanical grip + less downforce + earlier braking + enormous cojones = less interference with downforce from car in front = more overtaking in corners.
Posted By: Begbie

Re: 2017 F1 - 01/03/2017 07:44

Originally Posted By bockers
And McClaren engine failures, just like last season frown

Not failed, just issues rofl First problem was due to oil pickup on Monday. Tuesday was an electrical issue, today, amazingly hasn't broken down on the installation lap
Posted By: neil_r

Re: 2017 F1 - 01/03/2017 08:05

All signs are pointing towards less overtaking this year. Looks like getting pole is going to be the target again and with wider cars too, there will be less space to pass, even if you can cope with the dirty air and get close enough.

I hope Honda get their problems sorted and we have another competitive team. 8+ drivers fighting it out for the wins is better than 2.
Posted By: MeanRedSpider

Re: 2017 F1 - 01/03/2017 19:40

Stroll the new Maldanado?
Posted By: Anonymous

Re: 2017 F1 - 02/03/2017 09:11

3 off's yesterday? Not a good start.... Just seen how much his Dad is worth! shocked
Posted By: bockers

Re: 2017 F1 - 02/03/2017 10:21

"Just a stroll in the park" coat
Posted By: Cooperman

Re: 2017 F1 - 03/03/2017 18:30

Honda in trouble again! How much longer will that contract last if they don't get on top of whatever ails them this time? Alonso must be rueing the day he signed up!
Posted By: reben

Re: 2017 F1 - 03/03/2017 19:17

Cars looking good , but the sound , there is a lot room for improvement, It seems that everybody is driving in the safety modus, Hope that McClaren and Honda fooled us.
Posted By: Anonymous

Re: 2017 F1 - 15/03/2017 09:18

Last minute new title sponsor for Force India .......... Sales decline in Force India Merchandise........ shocked

click to enlarge
Posted By: Dazvr6

Re: 2017 F1 - 15/03/2017 10:17

It's certainly different! sick
Doesn't matter what colour it is as long as its fast though.
Posted By: MeanRedSpider

Re: 2017 F1 - 17/03/2017 14:57

I was at Renault F1 yesterday. Really fabulous to see what they are doing - quite some money being spent there. Crazy that it takes 2400 people to get those two cars out there
Posted By: MeanRedSpider

Re: 2017 F1 - 24/03/2017 07:04

Oh dear - looking more like a one-horse race than the last 3 seasons...
Posted By: bockers

Re: 2017 F1 - 24/03/2017 10:22

Indeed, it's a bit grim and the Sky coverage of the practice session has been awful. They have not put the leader board on the screen during the sessions, well maybe for a few minutes, but it needs to be there all the time.

I was hopeful the changes may have mixed things up but it looks to be the same boring procession behind Mercedes frown
Posted By: MeanRedSpider

Re: 2017 F1 - 24/03/2017 10:24

Originally Posted By bockers
the same boring procession behind a Mercedes frown


FTFY
Posted By: barnacle

Re: 2017 F1 - 24/03/2017 12:38

Well, given that they 'very sensibly' increased the aero, what did you expect?

It's *not* about who can get round one lap quickest, it's about who finishes the race first. If the pole-sitter wins nine times out of ten, there's not a lot of point...
Posted By: MeanRedSpider

Re: 2017 F1 - 24/03/2017 16:01

There have been a few "resets" that might (should) have shaken things up. The aero has changed in emphasis and the cars are pretty different - that alone should have given the others the opportunity to catch up. Added to which, there's no longer a token system on engines so there's an opportunity for other to have caught up there. Instead McLaren Honda seem to have gone backwards, Ferrari looked to be much better (and seem to be matching Bottas) but Hamilton is imperious.
Posted By: MeanRedSpider

Re: 2017 F1 - 25/03/2017 07:57

Today was more interesting (albeit predictable outcome).

Interested to see that Ferrari overalls have the Alfa cloverleaf badge on them. Thought that would be too subtle for most of the public.
Posted By: PeteP

Re: 2017 F1 - 25/03/2017 12:15

Just watched the first ten minutes of C4 coverage from Melbourne. Truly vomit inducing: rose tinted arse licking with the promise of the next segment being about Ecclestone's successors.

No thanks.
Posted By: barnacle

Re: 2017 F1 - 25/03/2017 17:07

recorded it, fast forwarded it...
Posted By: Cooperman

Re: 2017 F1 - 26/03/2017 05:58

Well that was a surprise!
Posted By: MeanRedSpider

Re: 2017 F1 - 26/03/2017 07:06

Yup - should make it more interesting
Posted By: Rob40

Re: 2017 F1 - 26/03/2017 13:56

Toto Wolff slamming his fist on the desk in total frustration was priceless laugh first blood....Ferrari love
Posted By: barnacle

Re: 2017 F1 - 26/03/2017 15:21

Too much bloody aero!

Don't think much of that vertical plank behind the airbox, or the coathangers, either!
Posted By: Cooperman

Re: 2017 F1 - 26/03/2017 15:52

I agree the aero package looks messy and despite the downforce increase following closely behind another car seems to have more of an impact this year. Hope we get some closer racing smile
)
Posted By: Dazvr6

Re: 2017 F1 - 27/03/2017 14:19

Nice to see a Ferrari win for a change but I find it a bit odd that Hamilton couldn't pass Verstappen.
It was almost as if he didn't want to and was saving his engine/gearbox etc?
Stroll just looked way out of his depth.
Posted By: neil_r

Re: 2017 F1 - 28/03/2017 08:56

Originally Posted By Dazvr6
... but I find it a bit odd that Hamilton couldn't pass Verstappen.
It was almost as if he didn't want to and was saving his engine/gearbox etc?


I'm afraid that if Hamilton on fresh tyres could not get past a Red Bull with aging tyres, the points might as well be awarded after Saturday afternoon frown

I doubt he was holding back. That did come later in the race though.

Melbourne is not typical and overtaking is especially hard there but the signs are not good for seeing lots of action.
Posted By: Anonymous

Re: 2017 F1 - 28/03/2017 10:48

Originally Posted By MeanRedSpider

Interested to see that Ferrari overalls have the Alfa cloverleaf badge on them. Thought that would be too subtle for most of the public.


click to enlarge

cool
Posted By: Hyperlink

Re: 2017 F1 - 28/03/2017 11:59

Its on the car too....with a less subtle Alfa Romeo script.
Posted By: Anonymous

Re: 2017 F1 - 28/03/2017 12:32

Yes the script has been on a while but first time I've see the Cloverleaf. Must be a big push for the Giulia/Stelvio
Posted By: Anonymous

Re: 2017 F1 - 24/05/2017 16:42

Not strictly F1 but I'm rooting for Alonso at Indy. Seriously impressive stuff in Qualy. Anyone else see Bourdais' crash? Damn lucky with a horrible angle on the wall....
Posted By: Jim_Clennell

Re: 2017 F1 - 25/05/2017 06:19

Looking forward to seeing how Alonso does. Also will be interesting to see how Button gets on at Monaco.
Posted By: Blueboyracer

Re: 2017 F1 - 25/05/2017 06:38

Button back in Monaco :-O Yay!!
Posted By: Dazvr6

Re: 2017 F1 - 25/05/2017 10:18

Button started off slow this morning but has got within a tenth of Vandoorne in FP1. Looks like he's settled in quickly.
Posted By: Anonymous

Re: 2017 F1 - 25/05/2017 11:05

Did anyone else see the Formula E race at Monaco? The shortened track was frankly ridiculous. Instead of going up the hill at Sainte Devote they cut through and ran parallel behind the run from the post tunnel chicane to Tabac. There was barely enough width for one car let alone any side by side action!
Posted By: Dazvr6

Re: 2017 F1 - 25/05/2017 11:15

Monaco is a crazy track in full lap form never mind a shortened version. I watched about 10 minutes of it before I got bored.
Posted By: PeteP

Re: 2017 F1 - 25/05/2017 13:39

I fell asleep in front of the television watching FP 2 this afternoon. If I weren't going to a 625 Squadron RAF memorial service in Lincolnshire on Sunday, no doubt it would happen again during the race.

EditAnd there will be the BBMF Lancaster flying over the memorial too.
Posted By: Anonymous

Re: 2017 F1 - 29/05/2017 19:35

Well yes virtually zero overtaking..........I still don't think Ferrari planned that but I don't think I've ever seen anyone so p*ssed off to be on the podium at Monaco.
Posted By: adder58

Re: 2017 F1 - 06/06/2017 11:39

I was playing Golf last week right by Biggin Hill Airport. When I saw one of those Honda jets land

http://www.hondajet.com/#1

Made me wonder... If they offered one of these to Alonso... would he politely decline chinny
Posted By: MeanRedSpider

Re: 2017 F1 - 06/06/2017 12:28

Holey Moley - I liked the look of those until
I saw it had Garmin avionics. Judging by how terrible my Garmin bike computers have been (mostly launched long before they were ready) I'd be scared to set foot on that.
Posted By: Anonymous

Re: 2017 F1 - 08/06/2017 19:50

Unusual wing-mounted jets?!
Posted By: barnacle

Re: 2017 F1 - 09/06/2017 04:30

Yeah. I wonder if they're there for noise abatement - wingover jets are quieter on the ground as the wing gets in the way of the noise. But they're not as efficient - they block the wing surface - so perhaps these pylons improve matters?

I was surprised to see a plane with so much weight above the wing and no visible dihedral; it can't be stable without continuous correction, perhaps from the electronics?
Posted By: Ballypete

Re: 2017 F1 - 09/06/2017 17:03

Interesting- wing seems to have a high aspect ratio looking at the shape and the winglets. Perhaps the pylon doubles as a wing fence? Bit worried about what happens if the engine fails/gets hit as its going to affect the upper wing surface?
Posted By: barnacle

Re: 2017 F1 - 09/06/2017 18:49

Wing fence isn't going to make a lot of difference, there, surely? It's the tips where it'll have the most effect, where the vortices form.
Posted By: Anonymous

Re: 2017 F1 - 09/06/2017 19:06

Anyway to Canada and a hydraulic leak after just one timed lap for Fernando in FP1. Think we're safe to say he'll be off elsewhere asap....
Posted By: Cooperman

Re: 2017 F1 - 25/06/2017 13:18

What a mess of a race in Baku, I can't believe Vettel can get away with that move on Lewis!
Posted By: Jim_Clennell

Re: 2017 F1 - 25/06/2017 13:26

I can understand Vettel feeling that Hamilton slowed down excessively, but to then deliberately swerve into him is a nailed on disqualification in my book. And I quite like Vettel.
Posted By: MeanRedSpider

Re: 2017 F1 - 25/06/2017 14:24

I don't think Hamilton slowed - he just didn't accelerate. Vettel was completey out of order.

Great finish.
Posted By: barnacle

Re: 2017 F1 - 25/06/2017 14:33

Still waiting to see any post-match interviews with the two of them. Vettel's response was right out of order, but asking 'when did I drive dangerously?' in such a tone of injured innocence when the pit told him he had to box was extracting the urine...
Posted By: Jim_Clennell

Re: 2017 F1 - 25/06/2017 16:35

I don't think Hamilton did anything wrong, but from Vettel's viewpoint, I can see why he felt Hamilton had brake tested him. What followed was totally unacceptable and I'm disappointed that no further action will be taken.
Posted By: Downhillryder

Re: 2017 F1 - 25/06/2017 17:02

BBC reports data from Hamiltons car show neither acceleration nor deacceleration. Vettel made an error and compounded it with some real road rage. He should be banned.
Posted By: Cooperman

Re: 2017 F1 - 25/06/2017 17:18

A one race ban would be fair given Vettels actions but not likely now even with the data from Hamiltons car clearing him. He is already at risk getting some points on his racing license!
Posted By: Anonymous

Re: 2017 F1 - 25/06/2017 18:04

Agreed Gents but what a terrific race - best I can remember for a few years. A Vettel fan too but he went too far today. I think he knows it now and expect some sort of penalty for Spielberg. I think he knew Lewis got the hop on him from the last restart so was determined to stay close but blew it. Brilliant to see Fernando back in the points and pleased for Mc / Sauber and nice to see Stroll do well - and I've not been a fan of his. Did anyone else initially think he slowed down too soon as if he'd got the wrong line to finish. Bottas' finishing acceleration was amazing. Baku looked nice too. Oh and fair play to Ocon as well - one for the future.
Posted By: Dazvr6

Re: 2017 F1 - 26/06/2017 10:11

A great race packed with action! Well done to Stroll for hanging in there in 3rd.
I didn't think he would ever make a good driver but showed plenty of potential in Baku.

Vettel has disgraced himself with the wheel banging.
It looked like proper road rage and should be rewarded with a 1 race ban minimum.
There is no place for that sort of temper in a race car!
Posted By: adder58

Re: 2017 F1 - 26/06/2017 11:41

All drivers know, if you hit a car from behind.. it's your fought... and when he went in from the side. I can only think this is the equivalent of a head butt in football.. instant red card and 3 match ban.. Seems his left hand was too busy waving to notice his right hand wasn't holding the wheel straight... and Sky caught him leaving the track and he didn't seem to know anything about the side ramming incident?? crazy
Posted By: Brilly1uk

Re: 2017 F1 - 26/06/2017 18:06

Had Hamilton genuinely "brake tested" Vettel, then Vettel would never have blown a fuse?
Vettel's reaction was more the action of someone who thought he had blown it!
(He had not had time to access any potential car damage and his first thought was he had been caught out).

The FIA will not want to impose an onerous penalty as they want to keep the show on the road, so far as the championship battle goes.
Still a bit of Senna-Prost type rivalry should help boost viewing figures?
Posted By: Dazvr6

Re: 2017 F1 - 27/06/2017 09:43

Maybe they could deduct 14 points from Vettel's total as a penalty! That would keep it nice and even laugh
Posted By: Cooperman

Re: 2017 F1 - 03/07/2017 17:15

He only got away with it! That may have some consequences in the future and Hamilton must be shaking his head.
Posted By: MeanRedSpider

Re: 2017 F1 - 03/07/2017 17:50

Yup - it's Ferrari
Posted By: adder58

Re: 2017 F1 - 10/07/2017 11:30

Well I enjoyed that race. A bit of everything. one total donut spoiling it for others. Dodgy Tyre wear, gambling whether to keep or swap them... right at the end a close fight for 1st & 3rd. And hopefully a 3rd contender for the title... and Brundle being offered tips on how to 'look like' you are drinking from a sweaty boot!!
© 2024 Fiat Coupe Club UK