Fiat Coupe Forum
- Founded by Kayjey & James Northam
- Funded by the Club for the benefit of all owners
Fiat Coupe Club UK
join the club
Fiat Coupe Forum
 
» Announced
    Posting images


» Related sites
    Main club site
    fiatcoupe.net


» External data
    owners listed
 
Who's Online Now
4 registered members (ExCoupe, IGGY, Sandhurst, 1 invisible), 177 guests, and 2 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums69
Topics113,594
Posts1,341,047
Members1,801
Most Online731
Jan 14th, 2020
Top Posters(All Time)
barnacle 33,553
stan 32,122
Theresa 23,300
PeteP 21,510
bockers 21,071
JimO 17,917
Nigel 17,367
Edinburgh 16,780
RSS Feeds
Club Events
Club Information
Track Events
Rolling Road/RWYB
Social Events
Non-UK Events
Coupé Related Chat
Coupé Spotting
Coupé News/Press
Buying/Selling Advice
Insuring a Coupé
Basic FAQ's
How to Guides
Forum Issues
Technical Problems
General Maintenance
Styling
Tuning
Handling
ICE and Alarm
Coupés for Sale
Coupés Wanted
Parts for Sale
Parts Wanted
Group Buys
Business Forum
Other Vehicles for Sale/Wanted
Other Items for Sale/Wanted
Haggling/Offers
Ebay links
Other Cars
Other Websites
General Chat
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 5 of 9 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Re: RacingLine RR 15/09/07 [Re: ] #436565
16/09/2007 14:30
16/09/2007 14:30

M
Matty
Unregistered
Matty
Unregistered
M



Nice to see the hybrid is still giving good results there Karl. \:D

Re: RacingLine RR 15/09/07 [Re: ] #436648
16/09/2007 17:22
16/09/2007 17:22

Y
yellow20vtbmx
Unregistered
yellow20vtbmx
Unregistered
Y



you know me guys it'll be fine once ive skinned my knuckles etc,

ive been under the car this morning and its a tiny paper cut size crack behind the 4bolt exhaust mount just befor the cat.

as ive landed the bumper flexed up and its scuffed the whole under side of the fmic, ive checked all the wishbones,linkages,suspension and cant see any noticable proplems itll be on the ramps at work tomorrow and ill check the front without any load.

thanks for the support guys

Re: RacingLine RR 15/09/07 [Re: ] #436672
16/09/2007 18:34
16/09/2007 18:34
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,469
Scottish Borders
G_Man Offline OP
Club member 1656
G_Man  Offline OP
Club member 1656
My job on the forum

Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,469
Scottish Borders
MABR - I was 220 at slightly under 1 bar and 226 at a tad under 1.2.

Thanks for thanks lads and also thanks to Eldiniho for sorting out the bating order.

Yellow - hope everything's OK after you've had the coop on the ramps. Let us know how you get on.


77 77
Re: RacingLine RR 15/09/07 [Re: G_Man] #436683
16/09/2007 19:23
16/09/2007 19:23

D
Doctorfrag
Unregistered
Doctorfrag
Unregistered
D



Hi there, good to see you doing a rolling road, however the results are way off what has been found on many other rolling roads.

a standard Coupe running 1.2 bar achieves 250bhp, maybe more, and the GTEC is rated at 250-260 bhp which has been shown time and time again on various reference roads, so to get 'only' 225 bhp suggests the rolling road is out.

Remember, the road measures torque and extrapolates via revs to get bhp.

If the rolling road was out by 500 revs, this would change the figures by 500/5250, therefore 225 bhp would *really* be 246bhp, and Eldinho with my old Coupe would be 355bhp, and I have over 50 rolling road runs at different rolling roads to show it should do 350-370 depending upon atmospheric conditions etc.

Joe

Re: RacingLine RR 15/09/07 [Re: ] #436719
16/09/2007 21:22
16/09/2007 21:22
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,469
Scottish Borders
G_Man Offline OP
Club member 1656
G_Man  Offline OP
Club member 1656
My job on the forum

Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,469
Scottish Borders
I'm no expert with this however how do you account the standard coupes returning what they ought to plus Cowboys and MattM's were almost bang on to what they anticipated \:\? As MattM pointed out he spent a few hundred notes getting it superchipped and a proper map to achieve 255 - is it realistic to expect the same from a chip through the post. I know many owners swear by them and indeed my power delivery is smoother and the cars more economical but gaining an extra 25-30bhp, I dunno...... \:\(


77 77
Re: RacingLine RR 15/09/07 [Re: G_Man] #436748
16/09/2007 22:42
16/09/2007 22:42

S
StradoZ
Unregistered
StradoZ
Unregistered
S



G_Man, what was your result with the G-Tech?

You would think if it was showing lower than it should then the standard coops would be much lower, however, if people are going to argue that then I'm happy since it means mine would be outputting more than manufacturer's spec. \:\)

Re: RacingLine RR 15/09/07 [Re: ] #436764
16/09/2007 23:03
16/09/2007 23:03

H
h2ypr
Unregistered
h2ypr
Unregistered
H



Well.... quick question fraggers...

500/5252 would be the calculation for torque? So the torque figure maybe lower...now torque is what is actually measured from the rr, then converted to bhp? But this throws everyones results right out? How would this happen?

Ross

Re: RacingLine RR 15/09/07 [Re: ] #436775
16/09/2007 23:16
16/09/2007 23:16
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,469
Scottish Borders
G_Man Offline OP
Club member 1656
G_Man  Offline OP
Club member 1656
My job on the forum

Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,469
Scottish Borders
On my first run (slightly under 1 bar) it was 220. On the second when the lads adjusted it to almost 1.2 (for the Gtech1)it was 226. I recall MattM expected 255 (which he got at a previous RR) and I think he posted 256 so no issue there \:\? Have to say I'm intrigued now so I may book myself in for another run else where for a comparison - like Well Lane...... \:D


77 77
Re: RacingLine RR 15/09/07 [Re: ] #436776
16/09/2007 23:17
16/09/2007 23:17

D
Doctorfrag
Unregistered
Doctorfrag
Unregistered
D



I've never been to this dyno but I am assuming it is the standard type of coast down dyno.

Normally they calibrate the dyno rollers to engine revs, so they can then extrapolate engine revs from roller speed. There is an ideal range of roller speed, so they will choose the 'gear' in the car to achieve the ideal roller speed.

If they do not calibrate correctly ,or the rollers themselves are out (poorly calibrated maintained etc), then the extrapolation to revs will be incorrect.

I think it was mentioned somewhere that the revs were out by 500rpm, if they think the revs were less than they actually were then the calculation to power will show less power.

Bhp = revs x lb/ft/5250

Rolling road days can often be a source of frustration, especially if peeps don't get what they were expecting ,that's why I used to go to several different dynos.

The Gtec 1 chip will generally mainly increase power due to running higher boost levels, so if you fit one then take out the ebv, and run stock boost, then you won't really see much improvement.
You really need to run higher than standard boost levels to get increases in power.

It would be interesting for everyone to list their modifications (or not) the boost level run and their results.

Joe \:\)

Re: RacingLine RR 15/09/07 [Re: ] #436777
16/09/2007 23:18
16/09/2007 23:18

D
Doctorfrag
Unregistered
Doctorfrag
Unregistered
D



G-Man, time and time again a Gtec1 coupe running 1.2-1.3 bar will see 250-260bhp being otherwise standard.

joe

Re: RacingLine RR 15/09/07 [Re: ] #436781
16/09/2007 23:28
16/09/2007 23:28

H
h2ypr
Unregistered
h2ypr
Unregistered
H



Yeah agree with what you said dude. Because of the run down date tho, it might not be the increase that would expected from running 500rpm out...

Eldinho is comming up here for a direct comparison against myself. Will be using a dastek rolling road i believe, so should be a good comparison. Its a new rolling road aswell.

Ross

Re: RacingLine RR 15/09/07 [Re: ] #436783
16/09/2007 23:30
16/09/2007 23:30

H
h2ypr
Unregistered
h2ypr
Unregistered
H



 Originally Posted By: Doctorfrag
G-Man, time and time again a Gtec1 coupe running 1.2-1.3 bar will see 250-260bhp being otherwise standard.

joe


It all depends on boost control method fraggers. Its the boost at redline which causes the problem. The torque figures would give a better indication of the rollers.

Ross

Re: RacingLine RR 15/09/07 [Re: ] #436784
16/09/2007 23:30
16/09/2007 23:30

M
MABR
Unregistered
MABR
Unregistered
M



Joe - as an example, mine was running a Gtech1, PRV, K & N Panel and a BlueFlame Cat-Back exhaust.

I knew the car was overboosting to 1.4 Bar but it still only managed 234 BHP. \:\? Was hoping for @ 250.

Before it goes back on the rollers, I'll be having a Greddy EBC fitted. At the moment, the standard chip is back in and the standard EBV is in operation.

Re: RacingLine RR 15/09/07 [Re: ] #436785
16/09/2007 23:31
16/09/2007 23:31

H
h2ypr
Unregistered
h2ypr
Unregistered
H



Check ur boost at redline mabr.... also what was your torque? running 1.4 it would be around 270-280lb/ft.

Ross

Re: RacingLine RR 15/09/07 [Re: ] #436794
16/09/2007 23:40
16/09/2007 23:40

D
Doctorfrag
Unregistered
Doctorfrag
Unregistered
D



 Originally Posted By: MABR
Joe - as an example, mine was running a Gtech1, PRV, K & N Panel and a BlueFlame Cat-Back exhaust.

I knew the car was overboosting to 1.4 Bar but it still only managed 234 BHP. \:\? Was hoping for @ 250.

Before it goes back on the rollers, I'll be having a Greddy EBC fitted. At the moment, the standard chip is back in and the standard EBV is in operation.


MABR, what was your midrange boost level? , PRV's can overboost a fair bit?
Has been shown that this setup will see 250bhp often enough

 Quote:
It all depends on boost control method fraggers. Its the boost at redline which causes the problem. The torque figures would give a better indication of the rollers.


Yep, I was referring to midrange boost levels in otherwise standard cars.

h2ypr, yes Dastek rolling road should be a very useful comparison between Eldinho's setup and yours

Joe

Re: RacingLine RR 15/09/07 [Re: ] #436795
16/09/2007 23:41
16/09/2007 23:41

M
MABR
Unregistered
MABR
Unregistered
M



Mine was hitting 234 at between 5500 and 6000 RPM. Power started to tail off after 6000.

Re: RacingLine RR 15/09/07 [Re: ] #436796
16/09/2007 23:42
16/09/2007 23:42

M
MABR
Unregistered
MABR
Unregistered
M



Sorry, forgot to say that torque peaked at 240 at 4250 RPM.

Re: RacingLine RR 15/09/07 [Re: ] #436799
16/09/2007 23:44
16/09/2007 23:44

M
MABR
Unregistered
MABR
Unregistered
M



Bugger - you're too quick for me! \:\)

Boost peaked at 3500 RPM.

Re: RacingLine RR 15/09/07 [Re: ] #436800
16/09/2007 23:47
16/09/2007 23:47

E
eldinho
Unregistered
eldinho
Unregistered
E



Hi Joe

I was looking forward to your comments on this, I knew you would have had a few! \:\)

It is quite strange how a few people got very low figures and then others got what they expected! \:\?

I will try and get the graphs up in the next day or so, so you can have a good look. \:\) I'm not really too fussed on the power figure as at the end of the day it is just pub talk, the car does itself justice on the road \:\) My main aim was too make sure the fuelling was ok and everything was ok, which i haven't really accomplished as the results aren't consistent. \:\(

Also i will be sending a PM shortly regarding something else. \:\)

Mark

Re: RacingLine RR 15/09/07 [Re: ] #436813
17/09/2007 00:16
17/09/2007 00:16
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 5,405
Castle Combe
Flea Offline
Forum is my life
Flea  Offline
Forum is my life

Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 5,405
Castle Combe
RacingLine appear to have a DynoDynamics rolling road. They are one of the best for WHP measurements, I know Cyclone and Jamiepm have always liked the DD rollers. Normally on a rolling road day, DynoDynamics use a "shootout" mode which simply calculates wheel torque based on the acceleration of the roller mass. This is a very accurate and repeatable measurement for WHP i.e. the mass of the rollers never changes, which a lot of people prefer. However, the fly power does not use a coastdown method therefore they simply add a fixed % drivetrain loss to give you the power figure. If you have your wheel power figures then that may give a better indication. I think it very unlikely that calibration is an issue so need to look at other issues.


[Linked Image]

Re: RacingLine RR 15/09/07 [Re: Flea] #436815
17/09/2007 00:20
17/09/2007 00:20

E
eldinho
Unregistered
eldinho
Unregistered
E



I think ATW it was 279bhp. which i beleive is still 30 bhp less to what Joe used to get!

The issue with the RR being out by 500rpm and has been like that for a year doesn't fill me with confidence!

Re: RacingLine RR 15/09/07 [Re: ] #436822
17/09/2007 00:45
17/09/2007 00:45

Y
yellow20vtbmx
Unregistered
yellow20vtbmx
Unregistered
Y



mines got a fmic,gtec1 k&n filter and prv set at 1.1bar was expecting 250ish,

first run made 212at the flywheel that was my best run, dissapointed to say the least.

then i turned to coop into the general lee!!!!

Re: RacingLine RR 15/09/07 [Re: ] #436827
17/09/2007 00:59
17/09/2007 00:59
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,330
Leeds
phil_20VT Offline
Competition Level
phil_20VT  Offline
Competition Level

Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,330
Leeds
Hows ther carbon fibre splitter Ben?

Now good i imagine.


Re: RacingLine RR 15/09/07 [Re: phil_20VT] #436830
17/09/2007 01:04
17/09/2007 01:04

Y
yellow20vtbmx
Unregistered
yellow20vtbmx
Unregistered
Y



fine the whole bumper flexed up 6inches and scrapped the whole bottom of the fmic

Re: RacingLine RR 15/09/07 [Re: ] #436865
17/09/2007 02:10
17/09/2007 02:10

M
MattW
Unregistered
MattW
Unregistered
M



sorry I had to rush off yesterday, just got back now.

My results were 215 bhp at the fly, 180 at the wheels, with:

Gtech 2
GTi-R Hybrid Turbo
Pace FMIC
Straight Induction pipe
K&N Cone
Blueflame 3" turbo back with decat
Forge DV006
Walbro 255 fuel pump + wiring mod
Blitz i-D 3 boost controller just under 1.2 bar at 4500rpm according to the graph.

I was expecting upwards of 250 bhp so 215 was disappointing, just had a full service at motormech and engine and turbo are in excellent condition. I was told the reason it was down was because it's running rich.

2000-3750rpm = 14.5 ~ 15 AFR
3750-4250rpm = drops to 11 AFR
4250-7000rpm = drops to 10 AFR

Any advice? \:\) Would I be better switching from Gtech 2 to Gtech 1, or a different chip altogether? I cant afford £500 for a live map!

Thanks

Last edited by MattW; 17/09/2007 02:13.
Re: RacingLine RR 15/09/07 [Re: ] #436868
17/09/2007 02:15
17/09/2007 02:15

H
h2ypr
Unregistered
h2ypr
Unregistered
H



Gtech 2 shouldnt be running that rich at redline. I would agree that your richness is causing your power loss top end... \:\(

What is your water temperatures like?

Also 14.5 afr is rather lean for that point in the rev range... Seems as if there is another problem.. like a sensor that is causing mixed figures... what boost was it running between 3000-3750?

Ross

Re: RacingLine RR 15/09/07 [Re: ] #436872
17/09/2007 02:22
17/09/2007 02:22

M
MattW
Unregistered
MattW
Unregistered
M



Once warmed up the water temps never go above 90 or below 80.

Boost graph is as follows:

3250rpm = 0.3 bar
3750rpm = 0.7 bar
4300rpm = 1.2 bar

I dont know which sensors do what, too many of them! \:P

Re: RacingLine RR 15/09/07 [Re: ] #436879
17/09/2007 02:29
17/09/2007 02:29

H
h2ypr
Unregistered
h2ypr
Unregistered
H



Thermostat sounds ok.

Boost figures are VERY LOW for those rpm's. Would explain why the fuelling is like that aswell... there isnt enough boost to trigger the increase in fuel. What boost at 5500rpm/6000rpm/7000rpm?

Ross

Re: RacingLine RR 15/09/07 [Re: ] #436892
17/09/2007 02:43
17/09/2007 02:43

M
MattW
Unregistered
MattW
Unregistered
M



between 4300 and 7000rpm it drops down to 0.7 bar according to the graph, which is a far bigger drop than it used to. I tested it a few months ago and it was keeping 1.15 - 1.2 bar at the redline from 1.35 bar peak, but I'm starting to think that might have been wrong and it has never really held that much, because recently the boost gauge pipe split and after it was repaired the boost gauge gave a much lower reading for the same EBC settings (so i turned them up to get 1.2 bar again). I should have looked at the boost controller's reading as well before but I didnt.

Re: RacingLine RR 15/09/07 [Re: ] #436898
17/09/2007 02:52
17/09/2007 02:52

H
h2ypr
Unregistered
h2ypr
Unregistered
H



Well your lack of boost at the top end will be preventing your power. Not the chip u are using. I ran 0.9 bar redline and got 264bhp with a gt28r... so boost at redline and holding the boost is imperitive. Maybe someone resetting up the boost and getting the correct figure? Have u checked all your boost pipes etc? Do you know that the boost controller is working?

Ross

Page 5 of 9 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.1
(Release build 20190129)
PHP: 7.3.33 Page Time: 0.018s Queries: 15 (0.008s) Memory: 0.8697 MB (Peak: 1.0793 MB) Data Comp: Off Server Time: 2024-04-25 16:43:24 UTC