cut and paste is worthless without understanding

You know what would be a fantastic movie?

E.T. vs Predator

Barnacle here is the full data on it and the effect explaining why the gravitational mass and inetria are equivilant. It also qoutes Einstein and DR Forward.

To Andrew where do I claim any of this my work? exactly I dont.

You are not willing to view the evidence that I have shared as its only whitness testimony. It would be funny however if tommorow someone failed trying to kill you and was caught by the police with whitness testimony. But you would refuse their testimony as it is not legit in your mind?

And Andrew I probably understand science more than you whether computer science, physics etc. Although Im sure you could write alot better than me but everyone has there own strenghts and weaknesses.

<sigh>

Already read that, Johnny. Still has the same confusion between mass and gravity and acceleration.

Szkom; see my earlier comments - the mass of the pilot is immaterial; if you change velocity you will experience acceleration (dv/dt) irrespective of your mass.

but if you intertial mass was reduced by 89% and all object arounds you were also reuced by 89% stored in a shell 'ring' strong gravitational field.

The gforce would be less?

No. The g force (rate of change of direction) is exactly the same irrespective of mass.

My point is if I, for example, had all my physical attributes but only weighed a fraction of what I do, I'd be better placed to endure those high g moments.

]Did you read the Pope's Wikipedia page I posted a link to? He really is quite sure that there is a god and has probably spent more time considering the issue than you and I put together. Does that mean that there is a god?

You see the issue?

All I ask is you view the 3 videos one from the polotician telling you his experiance with Trueman regarding meetings between et's and us. And the 2 High ranking officials who openly admit to be in the know of the existance.

Right, i have quite alot to do today, i have a number of questions but as you were unable to answer my questions on the Battle of LA, i'll ask my new questions one at a time as and when I have the time to.

These will be simple common sense questions which obviously should be easy enough for you to answer, i leave the science upto Barnacle et al.

You have said that the mainstream media are forbidden from reporting on genuine UFO sightings, but from the very start of the thread you presented 'genuine' UFO sightings with newsreel and Fox News footage as proof.

Please explain.

UK Press Told Not to Report Black Triangle UFOs UFO Magazine Says Media Got "D-Noticed" On Mystery Aircraft
A top BBC executive let slip recently that there is a D-Notice on media reporting of the so-called "Black Triangle."

The executive, who cannot be named, is the former producer of a very popular BBC science program. He told one of our team that the black triangle "craft," first witnessed by hundreds in the Hudson Valley region of the United States [mid 1980s], then by thousands in Belgium (1989-90) and more in Britain, has been "heavily D-Noticed" by the government. For this reason the BBC will not be reporting on the enigmatic craft, no matter how many witness reports they receive.

According to the former science program producer, the reason the government has seen fit to slap a restrictive notice on reporting of the Triangle is because -- so far as the government has secretly informed the BBC -- the craft is part of a new secret military project, and as such must be protected under the secrecy laws. If this is the case, however, it surely begs the question: If the so called Black Triangle is a secret military aircraft, then what is it doing hovering over residential areas and frightening people half to death? Something somewhere simply does not add up.

CNI News adds: As noted by Nick Pope in the previous article, it is very unlikely that the "Black Triangle" aircraft can be explained as a secret military project. Its technical capabilities and flight behavior suggest it neither belongs to any earthly government nor falls within the envelope of human technology. Perhaps, then, the British media are actually being warned away from reporting on a fairly obvious example of "alien" craft intruding with impunity into British airspace

Sorry truffle it was a busy day yesterday so I kind of forgot what question on the battle of LA?

Between the mid 80s and early 90s roughly the same time as the cattle muttlation was occuring in the usa over here (uk) A D notice was placed. What that means is no matter how many videos or testimimony recieved the bbc at the time could not broadcast. Here is a snippet on the Black Triangle Blackout.



A reference to Nick pope if you didnt know who he is? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nick_Pope


The tactics now have slighty changed within the media with a non serious approach to the evidence but ask yourself why do they still show it ?


It seems as if we have somesort of disclosure occuring.

Also has any one here heard of Gary Mackinnon ( computer Hacker) who on a dial up connection broke into nasa systems, you may of heard him on the news with America wanting to export him for trial he could face life.

The info he found backs up my claims http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gary_McKinnon


Barnacle my friend is A PHD in nuclear Physics I am going to email him about this T3rb and the possibilty of the actual concept. In the mean time will we look at what its based on there is far more info on that?

1 question to Jonny.

Can you see the point Andrew is making about the Pope as a 'credible' witness for God, and your military officers as 'credible' witnesses of UFOs?

McKinnon is accused of hacking into 97 United States military and NASA computers over a 13-month period between February 2001 and March 2002, using the name 'Solo'.

He claimed to have viewed a detailed image of "something not man-made" and "cigar shaped" floating above the northern hemisphere, and assuming his viewing would be undisrupted owing to the hour, he did not think of capturing the image because he was "bedazzled", and therefore did not think of securing it with the screen capture function in the software at the point when his connection was interrupted.[43]

McKinnon stated the image was approximately 256 megabytes in size, yet that the craft's details were still distinct in the greatly inferior 4-bit color and low resolution he had to reduce the viewing image to appear across his mere 56k modem connection (approximate transfer rate 5.4 KB/s).

So a man, who suffers from Clinical Depression, desperate to find proof of UFO's, claims he finds it and this is one of your expert witnesses?

So over a 13 month period, he NOT ONCE, thought, hmm that would once and for all PROVE aliens have landed on our planet. Perhaps i should print that out. Or tell a friend. Or post all this up on the internet.

Ok, question 2 (and this is very relevant).

Do you feel the video link from AndrewR is good evidence that God exists?

However i dont believe the term 'god' as the pope would have you believe if you catch my drift?

Yes. But that is the issue we have now 'GOD' is a loose term we have used to define our creator along with many different religions ie allah etc .

I have no doubt in my mind that creation itself must of happened or we wouldnt be here. However i dont believe the term 'god' as the pope would have you believe if you catch my drift?