1 registered members (1 invisible),
160
guests, and 2
spiders. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums69
Topics113,641
Posts1,341,452
Members1,814
|
Most Online731 Jan 14th, 2020
|
|
|
Re: Is 6 better than 5
#271174
07/01/2007 00:07
07/01/2007 00:07
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Well my 6-speed Plus is getting close to 520 miles on a tank now. And far nicer to drive. People say there slower, yet mine does a 14.5 qtr mile at santa pod, shame some of the 5-speeders in standard form couldnt match it. No speed difference. Those with 5 speed are just hella jelous.
|
|
|
Re: Is 6 better than 5
#271176
07/01/2007 00:12
07/01/2007 00:12
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Nope to and from work and odd tooutles around. About 100 miles on the motorway to get to that, otherwise i do 480.
It does drink if i kill it, had to do 25 miles in 20 mins on A and B-roads in an emergency once and it took half a tank. Made it on time though.
Last edited by carlt; 07/01/2007 00:14.
|
|
|
Re: Is 6 better than 5
#271177
07/01/2007 00:18
07/01/2007 00:18
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
I had a 5 speed NA before, and now have a six speed LE. I don't tear arse around, so can't comment on the speed difference between the two, but I get a hell of a lot more miles from a tank with the six speed when doing motorway milage to Glasgow and back than I did in the 5 speed. It could be down to the NA/Turbo difference, but I'd have thought a turbo would use more? Anyway, I'm convinced, 6 speed all the way
|
|
|
Re: Is 6 better than 5
#271178
07/01/2007 00:47
07/01/2007 00:47
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
I've never had a 5 speeder, but what I can say from the 6 speed is that's nice to be able to cruise on the motorway (in top gear) without it being on boost all the time - obviously if you want that, change down - or speed up
|
|
|
Re: Is 6 better than 5
#271179
07/01/2007 01:01
07/01/2007 01:01
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Quote:
Well my 6-speed Plus is getting close to 520 miles on a tank now. And far nicer to drive.
Whaaaaaaat.. You running some kp juice on it.
|
|
|
Re: Is 6 better than 5
#271180
07/01/2007 01:02
07/01/2007 01:02
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Quote:
Quote:
Well my 6-speed Plus is getting close to 520 miles on a tank now. And far nicer to drive.
Whaaaaaaat.. You running some kp juice on it.
Nope. Its on 518 now, light is on but i rekon i can get to work on it tomorrow, that should break my record.
|
|
|
Re: Is 6 better than 5
#271182
07/01/2007 01:14
07/01/2007 01:14
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
As the man said - a classic example of five speed inadequacy there
|
|
|
Re: Is 6 better than 5
#271183
07/01/2007 01:15
07/01/2007 01:15
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Quote:
Nah, 6-speeds are for poncey weirdo gay-boys like CarlT. REAL men don't need an extra cog to display their masculinity
Yet another jelous 5 speed owner
|
|
|
Re: Is 6 better than 5
#271184
07/01/2007 01:18
07/01/2007 01:18
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Quote:
Nah, 6-speeds are for poncey weirdo gay-boys like
those who still live at home with their parents in North Wales
|
|
|
Re: Is 6 better than 5
#271185
07/01/2007 01:19
07/01/2007 01:19
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
And how am i poncey? im not am i? papping my horn shouting move out my way commoner doesnt make me poncey does it?
|
|
|
Re: Is 6 better than 5
#271186
07/01/2007 01:21
07/01/2007 01:21
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
5 speed boxes have proven to be stronger and IIRC provide a higher top speed.
The 6 speed will be better for fuel consumption on motorway and relaxed driving. I have a 5 speed box and it doesnt seem as economical as the 6 speeders.
Ross
|
|
|
Re: Is 6 better than 5
#271187
07/01/2007 01:22
07/01/2007 01:22
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Quote:
5 speed boxes have proven to be stronger and IIRC provide a higher top speed.
The 6 speed will be better for fuel consumption on motorway and relaxed driving. I have a 5 speed box and it doesnt seem as economical as the 6 speeders.
Ross
In a standard coupe i dont see any strength difference.
In a modded coupe maybe, but then im certain it would make a higher speed.
Last edited by carlt; 07/01/2007 01:24.
|
|
|
Re: Is 6 better than 5
#271188
07/01/2007 01:23
07/01/2007 01:23
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Quote:
5 speed boxes have proven to be stronger and IIRC provide a higher top speed.
The 6 speed will be better for fuel consumption on motorway and relaxed driving. I have a 5 speed box and it doesnt seem as economical as the 6 speeders.
Ross
Ross, it could have a 12 speed box and it wouldn't be as economical with you driving you bandit
|
|
|
Re: Is 6 better than 5
#271189
07/01/2007 01:24
07/01/2007 01:24
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
I think barbz is changing back to a 5 speed with different cogs because of breaking 6 speed boxes. So although it might be technically possible to get a higher speed, if the box breaks before you get there......
Ross
|
|
|
Re: Is 6 better than 5
#271190
07/01/2007 01:26
07/01/2007 01:26
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Er at those sort of powers anything becomes weaker.
He can throw belts with power. Doesnt mean the 6-speed is a weak box, ive never seen a blown one.
Nyssa uses a 6 speed with new internals i believe.
|
|
|
Re: Is 6 better than 5
#271191
07/01/2007 01:27
07/01/2007 01:27
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
But the fact that the 5 speed is being used as a stronger solution means its stronger than the 6 speed. With extra power.
If i could get a 6 speed to try it out on my coupe i would.
Ross
|
|
|
Re: Is 6 better than 5
#271192
07/01/2007 01:29
07/01/2007 01:29
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Or maybe because people dont want to spend the 500+ it takes to buy a 6-speed.
|
|
|
Re: Is 6 better than 5
#271193
07/01/2007 01:30
07/01/2007 01:30
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Quote:
But the fact that the 5 speed is being used as a stronger solution means its stronger than the 6 speed. With extra power.
If i could get a 6 speed to try it out on my coupe i would.
Ross
And anyway how many people have destroyed a six speeder to say they are weak? Not many. Hardly any. Ive never heard of any.
You carnt say there waek because the odd one has blown at big power.
|
|
|
Re: Is 6 better than 5
#271195
07/01/2007 01:38
07/01/2007 01:38
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Yeh yeh yeh whatever, they probably havent got any oil in them.
|
|
|
Re: Is 6 better than 5
#271196
07/01/2007 01:43
07/01/2007 01:43
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Quote:
I don't think the 6 speed box likes cruising at 3 figure speeds for long periods of time.
From the people that I've spoken too (cough) it's not an issue, although it depends on what you term as a long period of time. Certainly an hour or two is no issue, by all accounts, but the germans have propoer roads and 3+ hours might throw up an issue, but then again it might with a lot of gearboxes.
|
|
|
Re: Is 6 better than 5
#271198
07/01/2007 02:07
07/01/2007 02:07
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Nah, 6-speeds are for poncey weirdo gay-boys like
those who still live at home with their parents in North Wales
Yeah! I think it's called "living the dream" actually
And being the only one in the Village
|
|
|
Re: Is 6 better than 5
#271199
07/01/2007 03:40
07/01/2007 03:40
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
520 on a tank, thats insane!!! seriously tho, how is that possible - what changes have been made from standard setup? wish mine would get even somewhere near that figure!
|
|
|
Re: Is 6 better than 5
#271202
07/01/2007 04:07
07/01/2007 04:07
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Only at the weekends Pinin, and it cost's £50 a go, so, unless the old family allowance has gone up, it means your not affording it this week
|
|
|
|