Fiat Coupe Forum
- Founded by Kayjey & James Northam
- Funded by the Club for the benefit of all owners
Fiat Coupe Club UK
join the club
Fiat Coupe Forum
 
» Announced
    Posting images


» Related sites
    Main club site
    fiatcoupe.net


» External data
    owners listed
 
Who's Online Now
0 registered members (), 114 guests, and 3 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums69
Topics113,599
Posts1,341,093
Members1,801
Most Online731
Jan 14th, 2020
Top Posters(All Time)
barnacle 33,553
stan 32,122
Theresa 23,300
PeteP 21,512
bockers 21,071
JimO 17,917
Nigel 17,367
Edinburgh 16,786
RSS Feeds
Club Events
Club Information
Track Events
Rolling Road/RWYB
Social Events
Non-UK Events
Coupé Related Chat
Coupé Spotting
Coupé News/Press
Buying/Selling Advice
Insuring a Coupé
Basic FAQ's
How to Guides
Forum Issues
Technical Problems
General Maintenance
Styling
Tuning
Handling
ICE and Alarm
Coupés for Sale
Coupés Wanted
Parts for Sale
Parts Wanted
Group Buys
Business Forum
Other Vehicles for Sale/Wanted
Other Items for Sale/Wanted
Haggling/Offers
Ebay links
Other Cars
Other Websites
General Chat
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 2 of 3 1 2 3
Re: Back on 225/45/16s with a huge improvement [Re: ] #1125854
04/11/2010 14:07
04/11/2010 14:07

M
Marko_hr
Unregistered
Marko_hr
Unregistered
M



Originally Posted By: Enforcer

Oh thank God!! Finally my chance to excel. I do hope I don't blow it!

The grip is lateral resistance to slip: How much lateral force you can exert on the tyre before it skids. The grip is roughly calculated as the total downward force multiplied by the coefficient of static friction (whatever), so the area of surface contact doesn't directly come into the calculation.

In other words, with a larger contact area, the force exerted per unit area is reduced, so the grip per unit area is also reduced proportionately. The total remains the same.


I'm not an expert on the subject, but the basic physics principes You mentioned are true, just there's something missing - the rubber (as any other material) has it limits, so it doesn't matter if you distribute a given force over small or vast surface, as long as you don't exceed the limits of the material, and it starts to shear...

In theory, a wider tyre should give better ultimate cornering grip, IF the car suspension is set up properly to keep the wheel perpendicular (or with minimum negative camber), limiting the contact patch deformation.

In practice, many road cars have suspension geometry that gives positive camber under body roll (favoring "predictable" understeery handling), reducing the contact patch. crazy

One should test the two dimensions, (same manufacturer and model) back to back, on the same car, to make a final judgement. smile

Re: Back on 225/45/16s with a huge improvement [Re: Nigel] #1125880
04/11/2010 14:34
04/11/2010 14:34
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,845
Darlo / Leeds
Darlo_Nick Offline
My life on the forum
Darlo_Nick  Offline
My life on the forum

Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,845
Darlo / Leeds
This topic has come up a few times now and each time it has made my brain hurt!!

So on our cars we would never realistically notice the different between 205 and 225 tyres.

But with more extreme examples;

F1 cars have wide tyres to produce a contact area that is wide and short, to increase cornering grip.

Drag cars have tall and relatively narrow tyres to produce a contact area that is narrow and long, to improve traction in a straight line.

Is that basically correct?


Instagram : Nick16vt
Re: Back on 225/45/16s with a huge improvement [Re: Darlo_Nick] #1125884
04/11/2010 14:40
04/11/2010 14:40
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 17,367
Staffordshire
Nigel Offline
Forum veteran
Nigel  Offline
Forum veteran

Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 17,367
Staffordshire
^^^

yes, correct


[Linked Image]
Re: Back on 225/45/16s with a huge improvement [Re: Nigel] #1125894
04/11/2010 14:54
04/11/2010 14:54
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 792
Stafford
sandytim Offline
Enjoying the ride
sandytim  Offline
Enjoying the ride

Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 792
Stafford
What we all need is wide tyres, giant front and rear wings and an extra 300 bhp....simple.
Why didn't I think of it sooner ? idea

Just checked my budget and have decided I might just drive around corners slower driving


[Linked Image]
Re: Back on 225/45/16s with a huge improvement [Re: Joe78] #1126039
04/11/2010 19:49
04/11/2010 19:49

Y
yosko
Unregistered
yosko
Unregistered
Y



225's has abut 10% less traction,due to 10% wider tyre. the forces on car is equal only torque will be 1,2% more for 225 but its unsignificant.

Re: Back on 225/45/16s with a huge improvement [Re: Darlo_Nick] #1126041
04/11/2010 20:04
04/11/2010 20:04
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 3,091
Leicestershire
Joe78 Offline OP
I need some sleep
Joe78  Offline OP
I need some sleep

Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 3,091
Leicestershire
Originally Posted By: Darlo_Nick
This topic has come up a few times now and each time it has made my brain hurt!!

So on our cars we would never realistically notice the different between 205 and 225 tyres.

But with more extreme examples;

F1 cars have wide tyres to produce a contact area that is wide and short, to increase cornering grip.

Drag cars have tall and relatively narrow tyres to produce a contact area that is narrow and long, to improve traction in a straight line.

Is that basically correct?


This makes perfect sense to someone like me,thanks nick. None of this p=f/a malarkey.

Thanks guys and sorry for opening a can of worms. I'm sure some of you enjoyed the chance to show off though laugh

Last edited by Joe78; 05/11/2010 03:57.
Re: Back on 225/45/16s with a huge improvement [Re: ] #1126056
04/11/2010 20:53
04/11/2010 20:53
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 17,367
Staffordshire
Nigel Offline
Forum veteran
Nigel  Offline
Forum veteran

Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 17,367
Staffordshire
Originally Posted By: yosko
225's has abut 10% less traction,due to 10% wider tyre.


Nooooo

a 225 tyre has a wider contact patch, but it is shorter, so there is almost exactly the same traction (there will be a slight difference, but it is nowhere near 10%)


[Linked Image]
Re: Back on 225/45/16s with a huge improvement [Re: Nigel] #1126137
05/11/2010 01:03
05/11/2010 01:03
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 9,729
Zele, Belgium
Kayjey Offline
Club Member #10
Kayjey  Offline
Club Member #10
Je suis un Coupé

Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 9,729
Zele, Belgium
Think this came up here before, I seem to remember that the conclusion was that wider tyres DO provide better grip (in all directions) because when you increase the tyre width with a certain amount, the contact patch will in effect increase more percentage wise than it will drop when you decrease the width - because of the curvature of the tyre longitudinal to the car...

Or something like that.


- Kayjey -

[Linked Image]
[Linked Image]
Re: Back on 225/45/16s with a huge improvement [Re: Nigel] #1126149
05/11/2010 01:50
05/11/2010 01:50

M
Mollymoo
Unregistered
Mollymoo
Unregistered
M



In fact my maths and my english were off, I said radius when I should have said diameter, silly mistake which totally alters what I am saying.

Mathematically the difference is actually 23mm, not 22.5mm as I erroneously stated.

A 225/45/16 tyre has an overall diameter of 608.9mm - 406.4mm of wheel + 202.5mm of sidewall (225 x 0.45 x 2)

A 205/55/16 (I assume a typo in your post when stating 205/50/16) tyre has an overall diameter of 631.9mm - 406.4mm of wheel + 225.5mm of sidewall (205 x 0.55 x 2)

giving an overall difference of 23mm which will affect your speedo. A figure of 5mph misread for every 25mm in diameter is often bandied about, though I have never seen any proof to back that up.

Last edited by Mollymoo; 05/11/2010 01:51.
Re: Back on 225/45/16s with a huge improvement [Re: ] #1126174
05/11/2010 07:40
05/11/2010 07:40
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 17,367
Staffordshire
Nigel Offline
Forum veteran
Nigel  Offline
Forum veteran

Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 17,367
Staffordshire
Originally Posted By: Mollymoo
(I assume a typo in your post when stating 205/50/16)


Not a typo - the correct tyre for the 20vt is 205/50 - a 55 profile is too high

This is why your calculations are showing a bigger difference than mine


[Linked Image]
Re: Back on 225/45/16s with a huge improvement [Re: Nigel] #1126200
05/11/2010 10:29
05/11/2010 10:29

I
Ianchat
Unregistered
Ianchat
Unregistered
I



With these calculations you must also bare in mind that they will always be indicative only as the max in service dimension will be around 10mm greater than the nominal. So you get the idea that the difference between the two sizes could in practise be less than the differences you may see between two tyres of the same size, especially as the nominal width of a 205/50 is from memory 214mm. As previous posters have pointed out, this difference is unlikely to be perceptible across the whole system.

Re: Back on 225/45/16s with a huge improvement [Re: Nigel] #1126233
05/11/2010 12:07
05/11/2010 12:07

M
Mollymoo
Unregistered
Mollymoo
Unregistered
M



OP states a 55 profile tyre not a 50, hence all calculations based on his information

Re: Back on 225/45/16s with a huge improvement [Re: ] #1126237
05/11/2010 12:26
05/11/2010 12:26
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 17,367
Staffordshire
Nigel Offline
Forum veteran
Nigel  Offline
Forum veteran

Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 17,367
Staffordshire
Originally Posted By: Mollymoo
OP states a 55 profile tyre not a 50, hence all calculations based on his information


Good point - hadn't spotted that. However, it means that the OP has been running on incorrect tyres, which gives another reason for the 225s feeling lots better - far less sidewall deflection


[Linked Image]
Re: Back on 225/45/16s with a huge improvement [Re: Nigel] #1126246
05/11/2010 12:57
05/11/2010 12:57

M
Mollymoo
Unregistered
Mollymoo
Unregistered
M



Originally Posted By: Nigel
Originally Posted By: Mollymoo
OP states a 55 profile tyre not a 50, hence all calculations based on his information


Good point - hadn't spotted that. However, it means that the OP has been running on incorrect tyres, which gives another reason for the 225s feeling lots better - far less sidewall deflection


Very, very true, whatever he has been doing he has had the wrong tyre on, so is almost guaranteed to see benefits to changing

Re: Back on 225/45/16s with a huge improvement [Re: ] #1126258
05/11/2010 13:48
05/11/2010 13:48

M
Marko_hr
Unregistered
Marko_hr
Unregistered
M



Originally Posted By: Mollymoo
OP states a 55 profile tyre not a 50, hence all calculations based on his information


Coupe 16vT with "Plus" trim came from the factory with 205/55 tyres on 16x6,5 rims.
I've seen no other version use this dimension though confused

"Plus" trim on 16v/16vT models is different to 20vT "Plus" - only leather seats, climate control and alloys IIRC

Re: Back on 225/45/16s with a huge improvement [Re: ] #1126362
05/11/2010 16:56
05/11/2010 16:56
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 9,729
Zele, Belgium
Kayjey Offline
Club Member #10
Kayjey  Offline
Club Member #10
Je suis un Coupé

Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 9,729
Zele, Belgium
Sorry, The 16vT Plus came with size 205/50 ZR 16.

The 16v Plus came with 205/55 ZR 15


- Kayjey -

[Linked Image]
[Linked Image]
Re: Back on 225/45/16s with a huge improvement [Re: Joe78] #1127003
07/11/2010 13:10
07/11/2010 13:10
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 5,390
Essex
Trappy Offline
Forum is my life
Trappy  Offline
Forum is my life

Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 5,390
Essex
Originally Posted By: Joe78


Surely a wider tyre has a greater contact patch with the road, and therefore more grip? I'm probably wrong but you'd think that'd be the case. If it's not then would anyone explaining why? (somebodys chance to show off)


The contact patch of a tyre is totally (and exclusively) dependant on the pressure of air inside the tyre and the weight bearing down on it. The 20vT has around 900kgs on the front wheels (450kgs pr 990lbs each). We all know that the fronts should have 39psi.

If you want to see what our contact patch is in inches, then you can't be far off in diving the weight by the psi right? 990/ 39= 25.38".

Carrying on my admitedly simple calculatiing, lets look at 205 vs 225 tyres.
225 width= 8.86"
205 width= 8.07"

Divide the 25.38" patch by the width and we have contact patches of
225= 8.86" x 2.86"
205= 8.07" x 3.15"

Because the pressure and the weight are the same, the contact patch is the same, only the shape of the patch changes.

The ONLY way you can change the area of the contact patch, is to changes the pressure or the weight on the tyre.

Other differences

Lower profiled, wider tyres will improve turn-in response at the expense of ride quality because of less give in the sidewall.

Lower profiled, wider tyres lose some of the 'self righting' of a thinner tyre.

Lower profiled, wider tyres reduce the feedback from the road, making it harder to feel the break-away point and on the limit balance.

Lower profiled, wider tyres have better heat disperal properties.

One last benefit of a thicker profile must be the ability to absorb bumps on poor road surfaces, keeping more tyre in contact with the ground.

Of course it goes without saying that generally lower profiled, wider tyres come from better ranges offering better compounds that WILL affect grip.


F****** b****** thing...
Re: Back on 225/45/16s with a huge improvement [Re: Trappy] #1127282
08/11/2010 01:00
08/11/2010 01:00

M
Mollymoo
Unregistered
Mollymoo
Unregistered
M



Originally Posted By: Trappy
Originally Posted By: Joe78


Surely a wider tyre has a greater contact patch with the road, and therefore more grip? I'm probably wrong but you'd think that'd be the case. If it's not then would anyone explaining why? (somebodys chance to show off)


The contact patch of a tyre is totally (and exclusively) dependant on the pressure of air inside the tyre and the weight bearing down on it. The 20vT has around 900kgs on the front wheels (450kgs pr 990lbs each). We all know that the fronts should have 39psi.

If you want to see what our contact patch is in inches, then you can't be far off in diving the weight by the psi right? 990/ 39= 25.38".

Carrying on my admitedly simple calculatiing, lets look at 205 vs 225 tyres.
225 width= 8.86"
205 width= 8.07"

Divide the 25.38" patch by the width and we have contact patches of
225= 8.86" x 2.86"
205= 8.07" x 3.15"

Because the pressure and the weight are the same, the contact patch is the same, only the shape of the patch changes.

The ONLY way you can change the area of the contact patch, is to changes the pressure or the weight on the tyre.

Other differences

Lower profiled, wider tyres will improve turn-in response at the expense of ride quality because of less give in the sidewall.

Lower profiled, wider tyres lose some of the 'self righting' of a thinner tyre.

Lower profiled, wider tyres reduce the feedback from the road, making it harder to feel the break-away point and on the limit balance.

Lower profiled, wider tyres have better heat disperal properties.

One last benefit of a thicker profile must be the ability to absorb bumps on poor road surfaces, keeping more tyre in contact with the ground.

Of course it goes without saying that generally lower profiled, wider tyres come from better ranges offering better compounds that WILL affect grip.


Great explanation and I certainly dont know anywhere near enough about this subject to comment on the scientific basis of what you are saying. I do however have a question. Your calculations lead us to the conclusion that a tyre that is 8" wide only has a contact area with the road that is only 3" front to back? Surely that isnt the case? A tyre certainly looks to be in contact with the road for more than 3" front to back

Re: Back on 225/45/16s with a huge improvement [Re: ] #1127303
08/11/2010 09:39
08/11/2010 09:39
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 17,367
Staffordshire
Nigel Offline
Forum veteran
Nigel  Offline
Forum veteran

Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 17,367
Staffordshire
I think you'll find that the tyre width figures are purely nominal - the actual contact patch is usually a fair bit smaller. This is mostly to do with the shape of the tyre (cross-sectionally) - the shoulders are often quite rounded, which narrows the contact patch (and makes it longer)

However, Trappy didn't add the killer bit of the equation - even if you increase the size of the contact patch, you don't get an increase in grip - you simply get the same weight of the car spread over a larger contact patch area, so the grip is essentially the same. The only thing that changes is the characteristic of the grip.

For example, dropping your tyre pressure will not usually result in a wider contact patch (it can't - the tyre can't magically increase its width). Instead, the contact patch gets longer, which aids traction


[Linked Image]
Re: Back on 225/45/16s with a huge improvement [Re: Joe78] #1127374
08/11/2010 13:06
08/11/2010 13:06

O
Orion
Unregistered
Orion
Unregistered
O



Originally Posted By: Joe78
Also I used to ride motorcycles a lot and the more power the bike has, the fatter the tyres got. Must be a reason for it. If not grip, then what?


Well, that's mainly for powering away and not cornering. Fatter motorcycle tires have a larger contact patch when not inclined. To the handling it is actually worse to have a fatter tire. The fatter the tire, the more you need to lean the bike to maintain a certain speed in a corner. More lean is less ground clearance, so the highest speed possible would be theoretically reduced by a fatter tire - although the difference between a 180 and a 190 wouldn't be too big. A 240 wide tire on the other hand is strictly for posers, a decent 190 or 200 tire can handle all the torque a motorcycle engine can produce - even turbocharged ones.

Grip and traction, two totally different vectorial thingamajings many people seem to blend into the grip denominator.

Re: Back on 225/45/16s with a huge improvement [Re: ] #1127422
08/11/2010 14:31
08/11/2010 14:31
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 2,084
Pontypandy
mr_tickle Offline
Competition Level
mr_tickle  Offline
Competition Level

Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 2,084
Pontypandy
Yous is all rong!

wat you need is them phat tyres innint!

everyone noes that phatter is better - it is just sience.

My mates car goze like its on rails and hes has huge phat tirz!!

loser


[Linked Image]
Re: Back on 225/45/16s with a huge improvement [Re: Kayjey] #1128116
10/11/2010 09:03
10/11/2010 09:03

M
Marko_hr
Unregistered
Marko_hr
Unregistered
M



Originally Posted By: Kayjey
Sorry, The 16vT Plus came with size 205/50 ZR 16.

The 16v Plus came with 205/55 ZR 15


A friend of mine bought 16vT from Italy (second hand), and it came with 205/55r16 on stock 4-spoke rims.

I thought it was a bit large dimension, but then I've read on this site it was the correct dimension.

As the song says, "...don't believe half of what you see and none of what you hear." smile

so correct is 205/50r16, it makes sense!

Re: Back on 225/45/16s with a huge improvement [Re: ] #1128159
10/11/2010 12:12
10/11/2010 12:12

D
DaveM
Unregistered
DaveM
Unregistered
D



The dangers of copy+paste smile

This has an interesting (and detailed) take on the tyre width / pressure / contact patch debate:

http://performancesimulations.com/fact-or-fiction-tires-1.htm

I think it concludes wider tyres have a slightly bigger contact patch but the relationship is far from linear.

Re: Back on 225/45/16s with a huge improvement [Re: ] #1128462
10/11/2010 21:23
10/11/2010 21:23
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 3,694
Midlands
MCMike Offline
Club member 2095
MCMike  Offline
Club member 2095
Forum is my job

Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 3,694
Midlands
I have now fitted my refurbished wheels complete with chunky 225/45 Toyo T1R's. cool

I have not had chance to form an opinion yet as I have only been running round town, but will try them on some fun roads at the weekend. wink

They look very nice, and it's good to (finally) have matching tyres all the way round the car ! laugh

Here are a few pics of the respray and the final results :-

click to enlarge click to enlarge click to enlarge click to enlarge click to enlarge click to enlarge click to enlarge click to enlarge

Almost 6 years on, and the love is still strong driving


1972 Triumph Stag
1984 Alfasud TI
1999 Fiat Coupe Turbo LE
2005 350Z




Re: Back on 225/45/16s with a huge improvement [Re: Joe78] #1207288
27/04/2011 11:08
27/04/2011 11:08

T
The_Squirrel
Unregistered
The_Squirrel
Unregistered
T



Just to add another spice to the mix how would 225/40/16 work on a coupe ? For some reason on toyos these are £10 a tyre cheaper than 225/45/16s so wondering how these would handle and grip laugh

Re: Back on 225/45/16s with a huge improvement [Re: MCMike] #1207342
27/04/2011 13:33
27/04/2011 13:33
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 395
Sweden
Rask Offline
Making a profit
Rask  Offline
Making a profit

Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 395
Sweden
Originally Posted By: MCMike
I have now fitted my refurbished wheels complete with chunky 225/45 Toyo T1R's. cool

I have not had chance to form an opinion yet as I have only been running round town, but will try them on some fun roads at the weekend. wink

They look very nice, and it's good to (finally) have matching tyres all the way round the car ! laugh

Here are a few pics of the respray and the final results :-

click to enlarge click to enlarge click to enlarge click to enlarge click to enlarge click to enlarge click to enlarge click to enlarge

Almost 6 years on, and the love is still strong driving


Looking really nice! What color code did you use? What process (preperation work, type of spray metod ?)

Last edited by Rask; 27/04/2011 13:53.
Re: Back on 225/45/16s with a huge improvement [Re: ] #1207351
27/04/2011 13:59
27/04/2011 13:59
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 395
Sweden
Rask Offline
Making a profit
Rask  Offline
Making a profit

Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 395
Sweden
Originally Posted By: The_Squirrel
Just to add another spice to the mix how would 225/40/16 work on a coupe ? For some reason on toyos these are £10 a tyre cheaper than 225/45/16s so wondering how these would handle and grip laugh


More up to the tire brand rather than the tire size. Good brand, nice ride and handling. One of my old P-Zero tires were from 1998, the rest from 2002-2005, when I replaced them with Hankooks last year it made a tremendous difference to the noise, ride and handling.

The one drawback is that the new tires are a bit "dirtier", wider tires results in more splashing on the body sides of the car.

Re: Back on 225/45/16s with a huge improvement [Re: Rask] #1207535
27/04/2011 21:04
27/04/2011 21:04

A
alx
Unregistered
alx
Unregistered
A



Originally Posted By: Rask

The one drawback is that the new tires are a bit "dirtier", wider tires results in more splashing on the body sides of the car.


I suggest LE-red mud flaps tongue

Re: Back on 225/45/16s with a huge improvement [Re: Joe78] #1207651
28/04/2011 00:27
28/04/2011 00:27
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 3,694
Midlands
MCMike Offline
Club member 2095
MCMike  Offline
Club member 2095
Forum is my job

Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 3,694
Midlands
Hi - I cleaned, filled, sanded & primed the wheels then used Ford Nimbus Grey topcoat with laquer on top to finish.


1972 Triumph Stag
1984 Alfasud TI
1999 Fiat Coupe Turbo LE
2005 350Z




Re: Back on 225/45/16s with a huge improvement [Re: Joe78] #1207710
28/04/2011 08:15
28/04/2011 08:15

S
shinyshoes
Unregistered
shinyshoes
Unregistered
S



Any issues with the paint bubbling on the fronts from brake heat?

Had that on a set of 20VT rims i did for the 16 grr

Page 2 of 3 1 2 3

Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.1
(Release build 20190129)
PHP: 7.3.33 Page Time: 0.019s Queries: 14 (0.008s) Memory: 0.9054 MB (Peak: 1.1562 MB) Data Comp: Off Server Time: 2024-04-28 02:31:08 UTC