Fiat Coupe Forum
- Founded by Kayjey & James Northam
- Funded by the Club for the benefit of all owners
Fiat Coupe Club UK
join the club
Fiat Coupe Forum
 
» Announced
    Posting images


» Related sites
    Main club site
    fiatcoupe.net


» External data
    owners listed
 
Who's Online Now
0 registered members (), 200 guests, and 0 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums69
Topics113,599
Posts1,341,099
Members1,802
Most Online731
Jan 14th, 2020
Top Posters(All Time)
barnacle 33,553
stan 32,122
Theresa 23,300
PeteP 21,512
bockers 21,071
JimO 17,917
Nigel 17,367
Edinburgh 16,787
RSS Feeds
Club Events
Club Information
Track Events
Rolling Road/RWYB
Social Events
Non-UK Events
Coupé Related Chat
Coupé Spotting
Coupé News/Press
Buying/Selling Advice
Insuring a Coupé
Basic FAQ's
How to Guides
Forum Issues
Technical Problems
General Maintenance
Styling
Tuning
Handling
ICE and Alarm
Coupés for Sale
Coupés Wanted
Parts for Sale
Parts Wanted
Group Buys
Business Forum
Other Vehicles for Sale/Wanted
Other Items for Sale/Wanted
Haggling/Offers
Ebay links
Other Cars
Other Websites
General Chat
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 2 of 3 1 2 3
Re: aerodynamics [Re: ] #1198016
07/04/2011 16:06
07/04/2011 16:06
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 9,706
Gone
J
Jimbo Offline
Je suis un Coupé
Jimbo  Offline
Je suis un Coupé
J

Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 9,706
Gone
A splitter will reduce airflow under the car but it may not give downforce to stop the front floating, a set of canards or dive plates set at the right angle (say 10-15 degrees) will give just enough down force at the front.

As a non crap looking alternative, a set of LE front lips will be an improvement on a standard front bumper.

The cadmuro front bumper lip may be better:
click to enlarge

Oh and if you do fit a splitter just for a one off run, it HAS to be level, don't just bolt it on to the under side of the bumper, get the angle wrong and you'll end up like Donald Campbell!

Re: aerodynamics [Re: ] #1198027
07/04/2011 16:27
07/04/2011 16:27

K
ktm450exc
Unregistered
ktm450exc
Unregistered
K



fabrication is not my strong point i might just try and borrow a cadamuro i was going to fit a zender anyway but if anyone has a cadamuro i can borrow at some point..i have a good undertray..anything else? i would try a splitter but wouldn't know where to start making one or the design to use ..anyone fancies getting involved they are welcome laugh

Re: aerodynamics [Re: ] #1198151
07/04/2011 20:10
07/04/2011 20:10
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 9,706
Gone
J
Jimbo Offline
Je suis un Coupé
Jimbo  Offline
Je suis un Coupé
J

Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 9,706
Gone
Originally Posted By: ktm450exc
anyone fancies getting involved they are welcome laugh


And be held liable when you stuff it, I don't bloody think so!

Re: aerodynamics [Re: ] #1198155
07/04/2011 20:16
07/04/2011 20:16

K
ktm450exc
Unregistered
ktm450exc
Unregistered
K



i will sign a disclaimer if anyones worried and do an on camera admission that its all my own doing whilst i am making the video for my family with my final wishes laugh

Re: aerodynamics [Re: ] #1198196
07/04/2011 21:08
07/04/2011 21:08

S
sediciRich
Unregistered
sediciRich
Unregistered
S



I would make the floor of the car smooth, this sounds simple but would need a fair amount of time on a chassis lift and you may not want to enclose the exhaust tunnel completely - I know the alfa 156 ST had the 'flatness' increased by bringing the flat floor towards the exhaust tunnel then turning 90deg up to the sides of the exhaust system leaving a narrow opening just under the exhaust no doubt done for heat management. A diffuser keeps the flow tidy from the exit of the rear of the car but its main aim is tidy high velocity flow to complement the air flowing under the rear spoiler - maximising its down force (needs a much large explaination really). Don't confuse flat floors and diffusers with having a tunnel and ground effect thats something different and not the aim. While you dont want lift I'd say avoid creating down force just cut drag. Thus an air dam at the front is useful rather then a splitter - but just for interest all of the wind test results I have read in RCE pretty much show splitter to be very efficient -F/D thus downforce with little drag.

Tape up door shuts, panel gaps, boot lines, reduce radiator openings (you only need 1/4 of the frontal area of the rad/ic to be effective at speed.

More drastic is venting the wheel arches that create huge drag, on the coupe louvre (sp) bonnet vents sealed to the arch liner would vent the front arches nicely but its a cosmetic change you may not like and bonnets aren't cheap. For the rear you want air to leave the back of the car nicely so a simple strip of sheet material at the boot's trailing edge blended to the top surface would work (look at a golf mkV boot edge), loose the wipers, and as much weight as you still need to get to the terminal velocity as quick at possible. The fiat has a good shape to start with so game on.

Last edited by sediciRich; 07/04/2011 21:13.
Re: aerodynamics [Re: ] #1198250
07/04/2011 22:18
07/04/2011 22:18

K
ktm450exc
Unregistered
ktm450exc
Unregistered
K



ok i have a spare bonnet here i can hack up and spare doors i was going to try and lighten for totb anyway..i would be happy to vent the bonnet to make this work but wouldn't know where to start or how to work the liners to vent through them..the nads for the job i have but the technical/fabrication skills i don't so would really be grateful if someone with at least the design ability could help explain enough for me to collect whatever items i need to make the bits to help the car up to speed..
up to now all i am likely to use without assistance is cadamuro bumper ,undertray, taping bits up and removing wipers.possible skinnier wheels..
rich so a little boot spoiler on the edge? which of the auto ds would you think best

Re: aerodynamics [Re: ] #1198528
08/04/2011 10:30
08/04/2011 10:30

M
Marco20valveT
Unregistered
Marco20valveT
Unregistered
M



ktm - I would go with making the under side of the car smooth and flat, from under tray back!

that will help a bit!

i can see there is alot of GOOD ideas here, i would pick the best options and get busy!!

i can see a lot of rolls of gaffer tape being picked up!! laugh

Re: aerodynamics [Re: ] #1198567
08/04/2011 11:02
08/04/2011 11:02

K
ktm450exc
Unregistered
ktm450exc
Unregistered
K



will have to find some tape with gum that wont harm my paintwork if anyone knows of any

Re: aerodynamics [Re: ] #1198669
08/04/2011 13:25
08/04/2011 13:25

S
sediciRich
Unregistered
sediciRich
Unregistered
S



Sure don't knock using tape for the runs, its is effective, virtually all aerobytes sessions I ever read have taped on ammendments to the cars for testing, although they test up to 80mph so anything that develops force needs to be well attached for what could be 180mph in your case.

Rear spoiler I was thinking something a little more DIY do you have a spare boot lid?

W.r.t. the bonnet there are many ways to do this and were not talking F1 level of prep - we want a join or sorts between the top of the arch liner and a vent in a similar position on the bonnet. Vent wise you could buy something preformed and cut a hole in the bonnet to fit it - mark out the outline of the vent in bonnet in masking tape and pen, use a good HSS steel drill, pilot hole 3mm, then use a bigger drill or a step drill to open up to say 10mm, then you can use a HSS jigsaw blade to cut out the shape. Remove the tape and stick the vent to the bonnet top surface using 'serious' stuff adhesive. The vent is an exhaust vent not a scoop.

You will then need some hose or tube going through a hole in the arch liner in a position towards the inner part of the arch (hole saw, jigsaw, heat with a heat gun and use new stanely blades to cut which ever option you feel will work) the hose ideally will connect to the vent but there is small issue of opening the bonnet, thus you may want a more rigid tube which then meets the vent on bonnet closure. We aren't talking air tight, but more or less working on the principle that air will follw the pressure gradiaent from the high pressure arch to the low pressure air flowing over the mid bonnet line.

You may wish to test the 'solution' after doing one side, some tufts of wool or string taped round the vent opening will tell you the air direction, if they are sucked into the vent then this is a failure, bad luck, but if they stand off the vent then its doing its job, its a 2 man test with a volunteer to stick their head out of the window and see what happening say at 50mph (I suggest doing the passenger side first smile ).

This is my idea, heres to links to items I would consider for the job
vent - http://www.merlinmotorsport.co.uk/p6902/BLACK-SIDE-AIR-SCOOP-INLET/OUTLET/product_info.html run so the narrow end is near the windscreen

hose - http://www.merlinmotorsport.co.uk/p4227/63MM-RED-SINGLE-LAYER-DUCTING-(PER-METRE)/product_info.html need maybe 2m to play with some shrink joiners or jubilee or some gaffaer tape works well.

Not teaching anyone to suck eggs but some tools I would use
drill bits - http://www.screwfix.com/p/dewalt-extreme-2-hss-drill-bit-set-13pcs/66597

Step drill - http://www.screwfix.com/p/step-drill-4-22mm/15976

jigsaw blades - http://www.screwfix.com/p/starrett-metal-cutting-50-x-4-5mm-24tpi-jigsaw-blades-pack-of-5/39966 need a jigsaw of course. You could use an angles grinder with cutting discs but that a really rough way of making a hole.

Hole saw for the arch liner - http://www.screwfix.com/p/titan-downlighter-holesaw-set-9pcs/71760

serious stuff glue - http://www.screwfix.com/p/evo-stik-serious-stuff-adhesive-290ml/23941

what are we emulating here, well this is a high end example
of the dtm car arch venting
http://fi.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tiedosto:Audi_A4_DTM_2006_vr_EMS.jpg

ond on the rear of the N24, I think you can see a way you could do it.
http://www.reverie.ltd.uk/astonmartin_archventing_modification.php

I wouldnt fit any after market 'styling' kit as thats all they are, the only wind tunnel tested item for sure would be the std.

List of things
1. Tape shut lines - easy, simple
2. Tape radiator opening unused SMIC inlet - easy
3. Flatten the bottom of the car - not so easy but would reduce drag decently.
4. Make a front lip, air dam, or splitter - not so easy must be well held on. lower the car as much as you can.
5. Vent arches
6. Add tail strip to boot - easily done, stip of ally, some rivets and some serious stuff. like this but with less angle -http://www.hotrod.com/techarticles/body/hdrp_0609_aero_tricks_tips/photo_09.html




These are not costmetic improvements, thus you may prefer some second hand bumpers to adjust then convert back to nicely painted items after the day. If you have spare doors gut them, cut out the inned frame, cut out the impact bars (8inch cutting disc on a grinder is how I did mine - Sparco did his also), remove the window motor, and retain glass in the best wedged in bit of wood to the bottom of the door you can way!, cut the excess strengthening out of the bonnet, do the same to boot (dont cut the hinges off).

I think you really could win if the engine is up to it.

Last edited by sediciRich; 08/04/2011 18:51. Reason: well if you edit a shorter link would have done!!
Re: aerodynamics [Re: ] #1198707
08/04/2011 14:07
08/04/2011 14:07
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,034
Sweden
Per Offline
I need some sleep
Per  Offline
I need some sleep

Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,034
Sweden
Venting the front wheelhouses has been on my mind too..
I wonder whether there's pressure or suction at the sides behind the front wheels. There should be the latter since there is a venting outlet from the enginebay already (between the hood & the wing). What I've been thinking is a vent hole at the top of the plastic arch liner, then the air goes out the existing side vent. The issue here could be a conflict with the engine bay venting.

Re: aerodynamics [Re: ] #1199065
08/04/2011 22:37
08/04/2011 22:37

M
MiniMetaller
Unregistered
MiniMetaller
Unregistered
M



Remove wing mirrors?

Re: aerodynamics [Re: ] #1199075
08/04/2011 22:57
08/04/2011 22:57

S
sediciRich
Unregistered
sediciRich
Unregistered
S



Yes! good man, remove or much smaller, forgot that, and wipers as said before

Re: aerodynamics [Re: ] #1199110
08/04/2011 23:59
08/04/2011 23:59
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 5,012
ation
szkom Online content
Club member 2000
szkom  Online Content
Club member 2000
Forum is my life

Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 5,012
ation
Fuel cap also needs attention. How about some slicks so you don't excite the air as much. A million cheap little things to be done (relatively).

The other thing that needs looking into is the mechanical side of things. For example what is the maximum loaded speed (RPM)of the wheel bearings? At what RPM do the brake disc reach an overspeed and burst? Are the bolts in the suspension up to holding the loads of a 170+ MPH car? Is the structure of the car up to 170+? Not to put a dampener on this, but to do this safely it'll need far more than a good engine.

Re: aerodynamics [Re: ] #1199152
09/04/2011 01:52
09/04/2011 01:52

M
MiniMetaller
Unregistered
MiniMetaller
Unregistered
M



Maybe also remove headlights and replace with a flat/smooth panel?

Re: aerodynamics [Re: ] #1199447
09/04/2011 20:12
09/04/2011 20:12

K
ktm450exc
Unregistered
ktm450exc
Unregistered
K



szcom..i'm thinking that 600 bhp will drag the car kicking and screaming to a serious speed even without all the little bits i have made well over 160 couldn't keep my eye on roasd and speed (sat nav) but saw the 160 and got past it with the 358 bhp i used to own that was just lowered/piu front with all the above bits done and a far better engine/power i'll be right..i am confident the car will take it as its the best chasis i haev yet had with new subframes all new drop links ,bushes,bearings,arbs comp brake kit etc its designed for big power/speed..its braced with various braces so all in all its as good a platform to try it from as there is

Re: aerodynamics [Re: ] #1199634
10/04/2011 02:00
10/04/2011 02:00
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,034
Sweden
Per Offline
I need some sleep
Per  Offline
I need some sleep

Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,034
Sweden
Wouldn't you need to fix the gearing..? I'm sure someone already maxed out the sixspeeder?

Re: aerodynamics [Re: ] #1199643
10/04/2011 03:04
10/04/2011 03:04

K
ktm450exc
Unregistered
ktm450exc
Unregistered
K



gearbox we are working on

Re: aerodynamics [Re: ] #1199824
10/04/2011 14:50
10/04/2011 14:50
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 5,012
ation
szkom Online content
Club member 2000
szkom  Online Content
Club member 2000
Forum is my life

Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 5,012
ation
I don't think I explained correctly. I appreciate you have a good chassis, but can you confirm that the brakes and bearings can deal with the RPM (wheel speed)? At a guess I'd suggest they were never designed for speeds you are planning. The same applies to the bolts holding it all together.

What you have to remember is that it takes roughly 4 times the power to go twice as fast. So as you can imagine adding another 30 mph or so over factory spec can mean a lot more force/load on the parts. I think you'd be wise to put a call into the manufacturers to confirm the ratings for all rotatives. Just don't want to read a thread where it's all gone wrong.

Re: aerodynamics [Re: ] #1199834
10/04/2011 15:38
10/04/2011 15:38
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 9,706
Gone
J
Jimbo Offline
Je suis un Coupé
Jimbo  Offline
Je suis un Coupé
J

Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 9,706
Gone
The coupe was designed to go 155mph and I'm quite sure they built a safety margin into the wheels and bolts, lets face it, he won't be breaking the 200mph barrier.

Re: aerodynamics [Re: Jimbo] #1199855
10/04/2011 16:29
10/04/2011 16:29
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 5,012
ation
szkom Online content
Club member 2000
szkom  Online Content
Club member 2000
Forum is my life

Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 5,012
ation
I'm sure they did. But was the Coupe designed to sustain 155? Because that's very different from getting there. Even if they did we're talking around 10-15% increase in the bearing speed to achieve the greater velocity (assuming the car breaks 170 and the effective rolling radius of the tyre doesn't alter.

I do appreciate in all likely hood everything will be okay; but for the price of a phone call I'd be on it...

Re: aerodynamics [Re: ] #1199943
10/04/2011 20:11
10/04/2011 20:11
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,360
stockport
volumex Offline
My job on the forum
volumex  Offline
My job on the forum

Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,360
stockport
got a front spoiler that may help if u are interested it looks like the cad spoiler

Re: aerodynamics [Re: ] #1200061
11/04/2011 01:52
11/04/2011 01:52

K
ktm450exc
Unregistered
ktm450exc
Unregistered
K



never seen one but if its the type of thing i need then great thanks

Re: aerodynamics [Re: ] #1200075
11/04/2011 08:26
11/04/2011 08:26
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 33,553
Berlin
barnacle Offline
Club Member 18 - ex-Minister without Portfolio
barnacle  Offline
Club Member 18 - ex-Minister without Portfolio
Forum Demigod

Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 33,553
Berlin
One thing which I don't think has been mentioned: you *will* require tyres rated to the speeds you want to go...


[Linked Image]
Don't get no respect! Coupe Fiat 1994-2000 - an owner's guide <-- clicky!
Re: aerodynamics [Re: ] #1200096
11/04/2011 09:56
11/04/2011 09:56
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 17,367
Staffordshire
Nigel Offline
Forum veteran
Nigel  Offline
Forum veteran

Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 17,367
Staffordshire
^^ - good point - IIRC, 'Y' rated tyres are 'only' rated to 186mph, although I don't think you're ever going to break that, even with 600bhp


[Linked Image]
Re: aerodynamics [Re: ] #1200141
11/04/2011 11:19
11/04/2011 11:19

K
ktm450exc
Unregistered
ktm450exc
Unregistered
K



ok what options does that give me on tyres

Re: aerodynamics [Re: ] #1200165
11/04/2011 12:08
11/04/2011 12:08

M
Marco20valveT
Unregistered
Marco20valveT
Unregistered
M




Re: aerodynamics [Re: ] #1200522
11/04/2011 22:49
11/04/2011 22:49

D
dlongstaff
Unregistered
dlongstaff
Unregistered
D



chinnyVortex generators
thumb or nono

Re: aerodynamics [Re: ] #1200543
11/04/2011 23:19
11/04/2011 23:19

S
sediciRich
Unregistered
sediciRich
Unregistered
S



erm dont think so, open wheel race car perhaps.

Re: aerodynamics [Re: ] #1200624
12/04/2011 07:19
12/04/2011 07:19

Z
zimpara
Unregistered
zimpara
Unregistered
Z



couple of things i have picked up on, firstly putting in bonnet vents,


Ill mention scoops even though your not talking about them , they are stupid! unless you need them for a top mount IC they are stupid, end of

Now back on track with vents

you have to be very carefull and watch that they do,. with airflow under the bonnet,

there also then needs to be sufficent air flow through the engine bay to give it the push that it needs in the right direction,ie not just mountains or air getting pushed in from the top .
alot of boys find that putting vents or scoops actually pressurises the engine bay and the hot air cant get out, (ME infact) being totally unproductive.

these vents are there to tease the air from under the bonnet out to a certain threshold and then to get whipped away by the airflow passing outside of the car,

ie might need to be running with a improved undertray( better sealed) and then have very well placed air scoops underneath the car flowing air into right areas to help with this,


many have found this a complete waste of time so do the very best you can , but have a spare bonnet around just incase,

Next thing, how lowered is your car?

next thing, POWER

If you decide to use fire extinguisher mod for a IC spray make sure you dont use the powder type>( yes me again)


have you thought some nitrous?



you have pm

Re: aerodynamics [Re: ] #1200628
12/04/2011 08:03
12/04/2011 08:03
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 33,553
Berlin
barnacle Offline
Club Member 18 - ex-Minister without Portfolio
barnacle  Offline
Club Member 18 - ex-Minister without Portfolio
Forum Demigod

Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 33,553
Berlin
Originally Posted By: zimpara
If you decide to use fire extinguisher mod for a IC spray make sure you dont use the powder type


Doh!


[Linked Image]
Don't get no respect! Coupe Fiat 1994-2000 - an owner's guide <-- clicky!
Page 2 of 3 1 2 3

Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.1
(Release build 20190129)
PHP: 7.3.33 Page Time: 0.015s Queries: 14 (0.006s) Memory: 0.8797 MB (Peak: 1.0944 MB) Data Comp: Off Server Time: 2024-04-28 14:14:22 UTC