|
|
|
0 registered members (),
1,169
guests, and 5
spiders. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Forums48
Topics103,728
Posts1,170,185
Members1,668
| |
Most Online39,516 Apr 16th, 2026
|
|
|
Re: Bilstein Shocks
[Re: MarioCirillo]
#1399513
23/12/2012 02:34
23/12/2012 02:34
|
ActionHank
Unregistered
|
ActionHank
Unregistered
|
I'm seriously wondering if mine were fitted correctly. It really doesn't sit that low. Think I'll be getting Joe to check this out.
(Joe didn't fit them btw)
Last edited by ActionHank; 23/12/2012 14:07.
|
|
|
Re: Bilstein Shocks
[Re: MarioCirillo]
#1407544
30/01/2013 22:35
30/01/2013 22:35
|
Pondman
Unregistered
|
Pondman
Unregistered
|
Mario, did you still need that measurement? I have that combo and an LE, so identical in theory?
|
|
|
Re: Bilstein Shocks
[Re: MarioCirillo]
#1448944
18/09/2013 13:19
18/09/2013 13:19
|
Hoops82
Unregistered
|
Hoops82
Unregistered
|
Could it be tired bushes? Different vehicle but once, on an old spitfire, I fitted a powerflex full kit to the front and back and even after it settled in (200 mile drive) it was still an inch or so higher than it had been with the old tired rubber in there. It had a rear leaf spring with intermediate PU doughnuts so is a fairly different matter but maybe a possibility on the Coupe?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|