2 registered members (Edinburgh, 1 invisible),
225
guests, and 3
spiders. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums69
Topics113,617
Posts1,341,267
Members1,804
|
Most Online731 Jan 14th, 2020
|
|
|
Re: 350bhp wanted
[Re: Flea]
#439977
21/09/2007 12:51
21/09/2007 12:51
|
sparco
Unregistered
|
sparco
Unregistered
|
Totally agree with Barbz depends on who is driving. Anyone been at Knockhill and seen me hassling the evo boys will tell you the coue does not bad considering.
Fergie the whole thing of how much is too much on standard internals is itself looking more and more like a black art to me. I am now in the process of upgrading my turbo to something that will flow up to 400bhp but only because i'm thinking ahaed for the forged route. However when i get it mapped i'll be putting restrictions on it to keep it within safe levels of BHP and NM's. I'm sure it was JohnS who said that it all depends on how good your car is flowing on what is good and what is bad and i tend to agree. The injector thing is interesting and i'm sure we could have a discussion on this re-fuelling.
|
|
|
Re: 350bhp wanted
[Re: ]
#440027
21/09/2007 13:41
21/09/2007 13:41
|
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 3,158 Near Reading
JohnS
I need some sleep
|
I need some sleep
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 3,158
Near Reading
|
As for gaining more power from leaning the mixture, yes you can or in the case of PT they like to run it much richer to get more ignition advance. By comparison, Owen Devs run it a lot leaner but the ignition map isn't as aggressive. Horses for courses although I know which one I prefer... That's not really true - the 2.4s run less advance because they run a higher CR. My car cannot make any more power with more fuel as anyway I'm making more than anyone has seen on a GT3076R on pump fuel pretty much regardless of engine type and regardless of the fact I run a lot less boost than most people on this turbo. The beauty of Barbz' engineering I guess, much like on yours that makes more on a GT2871R than anyone could reasonably expect. Maybe Owens do back off the advance more than PT do - couldn't definitively say. Turns out my car made another 22BHP (590BHP) on road fuel without pinking but they didn't consider that safe at this power level and I asked for it to be conservative anyway. This is all mapped without water injection and then my water injection was added on top with fuel compensation but no extra advance either.
|
|
|
Re: 350bhp wanted
[Re: JohnS]
#440086
21/09/2007 15:07
21/09/2007 15:07
|
13ad13oy
Unregistered
|
13ad13oy
Unregistered
|
Thinking about what Barbz and Sparco said, I guess "how fast" is largely down to A. Who is driving B. You may have 350hp but without decent tyres for the grip on straights and with out decent suspension and brakes for the corners If you can't get the power down - who Cares how fast you are / power you have? A wise man said to me once "I dont want more than 300hp so I can still drive my car in the rain!"
|
|
|
Re: 350bhp wanted
[Re: ]
#440103
21/09/2007 15:27
21/09/2007 15:27
|
h2ypr
Unregistered
|
h2ypr
Unregistered
|
Fuelling is such a weird issue. Im sure if everyone had brand new injectors, we could do a comparison, but it ranges so much. As i mentioned earlier, i have never had the problem of running lean.
Ross
|
|
|
Re: 350bhp wanted
[Re: ]
#440132
21/09/2007 15:52
21/09/2007 15:52
|
13ad13oy
Unregistered
|
13ad13oy
Unregistered
|
Maybe Barbz can tell us the correct answer? - Barbz, How do you get 350bhp? Or is it a secret
|
|
|
Re: 350bhp wanted
[Re: ]
#440170
21/09/2007 16:21
21/09/2007 16:21
|
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 132
Markus
On a journey
|
On a journey
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 132
|
don't know what all the fuss is about...mapped unmapped etc If the result achieves the goal you set to achieve safely who cares? My car was "unmapped" but the fueling was safe with no det. I achieved well over 350bhp and i ran standard injectors and approx 3bar fuel pressure at the rail. Even when the spark plugs were checked you could see that the fuelling was very good due the golden brown colour not sooty or black like some.
|
|
|
Re: 350bhp wanted
[Re: ]
#440189
21/09/2007 16:31
21/09/2007 16:31
|
Barbz
Unregistered
|
Barbz
Unregistered
|
The answers are in the debate, all depends which camp you follow?
|
|
|
Re: 350bhp wanted
[Re: ]
#440236
21/09/2007 17:26
21/09/2007 17:26
|
13ad13oy
Unregistered
|
13ad13oy
Unregistered
|
Maybe there isn't a straight answer to "how do you get 350bhp?" Maybe the answer is how ever you manage to get there, well done!
|
|
|
Re: 350bhp wanted
[Re: ]
#440246
21/09/2007 17:43
21/09/2007 17:43
|
h2ypr
Unregistered
|
h2ypr
Unregistered
|
The answers are in the debate, all depends which camp you follow? All hail.... Lol. Ross
|
|
|
Re: 350bhp wanted
[Re: ]
#440281
21/09/2007 19:09
21/09/2007 19:09
|
MABR
Unregistered
|
MABR
Unregistered
|
The answers are in the debate, all depends which camp you follow? Does anyone find it quite surreal that Barbz is classed as a "Newbee"?
|
|
|
Re: 350bhp wanted
[Re: ]
#440294
21/09/2007 19:37
21/09/2007 19:37
|
sparco
Unregistered
|
sparco
Unregistered
|
i was thinking that too, bt is it really him and is the post real???
|
|
|
Re: 350bhp wanted
[Re: ]
#440304
21/09/2007 19:42
21/09/2007 19:42
|
h2ypr
Unregistered
|
h2ypr
Unregistered
|
|
|
|
Re: 350bhp wanted
[Re: ]
#440443
22/09/2007 00:40
22/09/2007 00:40
|
Fergie
Unregistered
|
Fergie
Unregistered
|
Barbz is hopeless with computers Yes its him. Yes you could run 400bhp on standard internals and get away with it. Question is for how long... (Don't they do this in Scandanavia, but then the air temps are much lower?) The simple answer is not as long as having forged internals - all being equal We all agree heat is a killer - thats how so many standard turbos running big boost die - and lack of oil. But is boost pressure? Or is that the catalyst for heat? Fueling and det is another issue. We all know the coupe ringlands are pretty weak.
|
|
|
|