|
0 registered members (),
1,646
guests, and 5
spiders. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Forums48
Topics103,663
Posts1,169,627
Members1,626
| |
Most Online39,516 Apr 16th, 2026
|
|
|
Re: Front Lower Brace
[Re: Nigel]
#670284
28/08/2008 22:14
28/08/2008 22:14
|
knight7660
Unregistered
|
knight7660
Unregistered
|
i think someone should do a poll for a group buy, i would but i dont get on the net that much
|
|
|
Re: Front Lower Brace
[Re: ]
#670303
28/08/2008 23:12
28/08/2008 23:12
|
MattM
Unregistered
|
MattM
Unregistered
|
Can someone just confirm that the following will fit a 20vt;
http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/OMP-Lower-Strut-Brace-ALFA-ROMEO-156-2-0-16V-TS_W0QQitemZ150284614592QQcmdZViewItem?hash=item150284614592&_trkparms=39%3A1%7C66%3A2%7C65%3A1%7C240%3A1318&_trksid=p3286.c0.m14
Cheers, Matt
|
|
|
Re: Front Lower Brace
[Re: Countrycruising]
#670307
28/08/2008 23:19
28/08/2008 23:19
|
MattM
Unregistered
|
MattM
Unregistered
|
It wont fit? or is it crap?
|
|
|
Re: Front Lower Brace
[Re: Countrycruising]
#670316
28/08/2008 23:36
28/08/2008 23:36
|
MattM
Unregistered
|
MattM
Unregistered
|
Yeah there is no adjustment or anything on that one from ebay. only saw it as someone mentioned a 156 brace would fit. Interesting to know if it does. Cheap mod!
|
|
|
Re: Front Lower Brace
[Re: ]
#670420
29/08/2008 10:10
29/08/2008 10:10
|
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 12,309 Sandhurst
Begbie
ex El Presidente
|
ex El Presidente
I AM a Coop
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 12,309
Sandhurst
|
Can someone just confirm that the following will fit a 20vt;
http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/OMP-Lower-Strut-Brace-ALFA-ROMEO-156-2-0-16V-TS_W0QQitemZ150284614592QQcmdZViewItem?hash=item150284614592&_trkparms=39%3A1%7C66%3A2%7C65%3A1%7C240%3A1318&_trksid=p3286.c0.m14
Cheers, Matt
Yes it will fit
Your car is Usain Bolt with wellies
|
|
|
Re: Front Lower Brace
[Re: Begbie]
#670494
29/08/2008 11:50
29/08/2008 11:50
|
ben20vt
Unregistered
|
ben20vt
Unregistered
|
I have ordered one of the 156 braces from rallydesign.co.uk as Having read about and experienced Strutbracer's customer support first hand, I'm not keen to repeat that.... Anyway, he has none in stock, and OMP have just come back off their annual shutdown...If anyone else wants one, the order will be going in early next week, and will not be repeated until next month....
|
|
|
Re: Front Lower Brace
[Re: Nigel]
#670574
29/08/2008 13:51
29/08/2008 13:51
|
paul20vturbo
Unregistered
|
paul20vturbo
Unregistered
|
I also would be intrested in one to
|
|
|
Re: Front Lower Brace
[Re: Begbie]
#670783
29/08/2008 21:12
29/08/2008 21:12
|
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 9,707 Gone
Jimbo
Je suis un Coupé
|
Je suis un Coupé
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 9,707
Gone
|
|
|
|
Re: Front Lower Brace
[Re: Jimbo]
#670796
29/08/2008 21:49
29/08/2008 21:49
|
sparkyman
Unregistered
|
sparkyman
Unregistered
|
Tight, very tight Jimbo.
Only 50 quid..mmmm
|
|
|
Re: Front Lower Brace
[Re: ]
#670803
29/08/2008 22:19
29/08/2008 22:19
|
sprintsteve
Unregistered
|
sprintsteve
Unregistered
|
whats the ground clearance like jimbo,you hit it on anything yet?
tempted at 50 quid
|
|
|
Re: Front Lower Brace
[Re: Gaz]
#674172
04/09/2008 20:17
04/09/2008 20:17
|
symonh2000
Unregistered
|
symonh2000
Unregistered
|
I have been thinking about this, and I reckon it would be possible to use a piece of Flat steel bar bolted between the front wishbone mountings.
As it is flat it souldn't affect ground clearance much. It would also be cheap, probably less that £15 even if it was powder coated.
What do you all reckon? I have access to some free 50x8mm flat bar at work, as well as some longer bolts for the wishbones.
What do you guys think?
|
|
|
Re: Front Lower Brace
[Re: ]
#674191
04/09/2008 21:05
04/09/2008 21:05
|
Nobby
Unregistered
|
Nobby
Unregistered
|
Clearance to the downpipe is an issue with the lower support braces. I'm sure someone will be along with a technical metalurgist type assessment of tube/solid vs flat bar.
Chris
|
|
|
Re: Front Lower Brace
[Re: ]
#674215
04/09/2008 21:53
04/09/2008 21:53
|
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 17,386 Staffordshire
Nigel
Forum veteran
|
Forum veteran
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 17,386
Staffordshire
|
flat bar (especially only 8mm) would flex under compression Tube is just as strong as solid bar under compression and tension, and is possibly even stronger in flex. However, my experience of tube is that it is much less resistant to large rocks and bricks, and will end up being bashed flat at some point in its life (especially if you're already lowered) I spent a LONG time designing my lower brace and came up with solid 20mm stainless bar - not exactly the lightest solution, but highly resistant to everything that's hit it so far. Now polling to see if there's enough interest in a new batch new subframe brace GB thread
|
|
|
Re: Front Lower Brace
[Re: Nigel]
#674227
04/09/2008 22:10
04/09/2008 22:10
|
symonh2000
Unregistered
|
symonh2000
Unregistered
|
Thanks for that Nigel.. I did think that it may flex, but I thought I may as well ask as I have it freely availably.
Do you think 25x25 3mm wall box section with mounting tabs welded at the ends would work? As I have access to that as well as a welder.
|
|
|
Re: Front Lower Brace
[Re: Nigel]
#674253
04/09/2008 22:58
04/09/2008 22:58
|
symonh2000
Unregistered
|
symonh2000
Unregistered
|
Ok then, thanks Nigel. 
|
|
|
Re: Front Lower Brace
[Re: Nigel]
#674371
05/09/2008 09:23
05/09/2008 09:23
|
k9huff
Unregistered
|
k9huff
Unregistered
|
it would work better than flat plate, but it will still flex more than tube or circular bar A bit of a generalisation! It would flex less then a 25mm diameter round tube of 3mm steel.
|
|
|
Re: Front Lower Brace
[Re: ]
#674383
05/09/2008 09:43
05/09/2008 09:43
|
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 9,707 Gone
Jimbo
Je suis un Coupé
|
Je suis un Coupé
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 9,707
Gone
|
|
|
|
Re: Front Lower Brace
[Re: Nigel]
#674416
05/09/2008 10:25
05/09/2008 10:25
|
k9huff
Unregistered
|
k9huff
Unregistered
|
That is a common misconception. Bending resistance is governed by the second moment of area, and a square section wins over a round one given equal sizes i.e. diameter of round section is same as the egde of the square section and same wall thickness.
The reason that round tubes are used for some space framed cars (many use square) is that for a given resistance to bending, round tube is lighter, i.e. it's a more efficient use of material.
|
|
|
|