Fiat Coupe Forum
- Founded by Kayjey & James Northam
- Funded by the Club for the benefit of all owners
Fiat Coupe Club UK
join the club
Fiat Coupe Forum
 
» Announced
    Posting images


» Related sites
    Main club site
    fiatcoupe.net


» External data
    owners listed
 
Who's Online Now
0 registered members (), 346 guests, and 0 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums69
Topics113,600
Posts1,341,110
Members1,802
Most Online731
Jan 14th, 2020
Top Posters(All Time)
barnacle 33,553
stan 32,122
Theresa 23,300
PeteP 21,512
bockers 21,071
JimO 17,917
Nigel 17,367
Edinburgh 16,788
RSS Feeds
Club Events
Club Information
Track Events
Rolling Road/RWYB
Social Events
Non-UK Events
Coupé Related Chat
Coupé Spotting
Coupé News/Press
Buying/Selling Advice
Insuring a Coupé
Basic FAQ's
How to Guides
Forum Issues
Technical Problems
General Maintenance
Styling
Tuning
Handling
ICE and Alarm
Coupés for Sale
Coupés Wanted
Parts for Sale
Parts Wanted
Group Buys
Business Forum
Other Vehicles for Sale/Wanted
Other Items for Sale/Wanted
Haggling/Offers
Ebay links
Other Cars
Other Websites
General Chat
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 2 of 2 1 2
Re: #BHP vs MPG [Re: ] #809833
08/04/2009 10:19
08/04/2009 10:19

E
eldinho
Unregistered
eldinho
Unregistered
E



I've spent easily over that on parts alone to get it from 360-370bhp to hopefully 400+! When I bought the car off Joe I worked out that he had spent close to £15k. Tuning isn't cheap!

Re: #BHP vs MPG [Re: ] #809838
08/04/2009 10:21
08/04/2009 10:21

P
peanuthead
Unregistered
peanuthead
Unregistered
P



really? i think i might give up on the coop then as pretty much any other turbo car i ahve had i could get 400 bhp for around £3000 to £3500 using secondhand parts.

Re: #BHP vs MPG [Re: ] #809844
08/04/2009 10:28
08/04/2009 10:28

E
eldinho
Unregistered
eldinho
Unregistered
E



it wouldn't cost nowhere near what has been spent on mine, but I think you are looking at least double what you've said to have a "reliable" 400bhp. And thats without suspension and brakes.

Re: #BHP vs MPG [Re: ] #809852
08/04/2009 10:38
08/04/2009 10:38
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 17,367
Staffordshire
Nigel Offline
Forum veteran
Nigel  Offline
Forum veteran

Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 17,367
Staffordshire
This has been done a thousand times, but let's do it once more with secondhand parts prices

Rods - £500
Pistons - £500
Flowed head - £500
Turbo - £750
Downpipe - £200
Boost control - £250
Intake (filter, SIP) £100
Intercooler - £300
Dumpvalve - £50
injectors - £200
Mapping - £500

Total = £3,850

This assumes you can actually FIND all the parts secondhand - you may end up with a very long wait.

It also assumes you fit everything yourself - it doesn't include all the extras (would you fit a flowed head without replacing the cambelt? - no, neither would I)

I reckon this is the absolute minimum you would need to get to 400bhp - however, IMHO, you would also need to spend another £1000 or so on making the car stop and handle as well.

To do it properly and with someone fitting bits for you, I still reckon you're looking at £7,500 minimum


[Linked Image]
Re: #BHP vs MPG [Re: Nigel] #809853
08/04/2009 10:40
08/04/2009 10:40
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 17,367
Staffordshire
Nigel Offline
Forum veteran
Nigel  Offline
Forum veteran

Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 17,367
Staffordshire
peanut - the reason you can get to 400bhp on other turbo cars is because you're thinking of a Skyline, which starts off with a bigger displacement, higher starting power and more easily accessible (and cheaper) tuning bits

If you're thinking about a Rover Tomcat, you cannot possibly get one of those to 400bhp for £3k


[Linked Image]
Re: #BHP vs MPG [Re: Nigel] #809862
08/04/2009 10:48
08/04/2009 10:48

E
eldinho
Unregistered
eldinho
Unregistered
E



Those bits that Nigel mentioned like cambelts soon add up! rebore, gasket set, spark plugs, bearings, the list goes on.

Nigel can I shop where you do for cylinder heads please laugh

Re: #BHP vs MPG [Re: ] #809870
08/04/2009 10:56
08/04/2009 10:56

P
peanuthead
Unregistered
peanuthead
Unregistered
P



yeah you could get 400bhp using secondhand parts on a tomcat.
infact there was a full setup including new forge block bored to 2.1 and so on for 2k including turbo rated to 380bhp for 2k on rovercoupe forum.
so maybe 400bhp would be achivable on the tomcat.
well maybesay 4k if i done the work myself on the coop.
using secondhand parts a gtst would be about 3k and a rb26 gtr even less.
i have some of that list waiting to go one or already on so im getting there :-)
i agree with the handdling and brakes but thats another story. i know one guy with 610bhp on a certain car and he had standard carpy brakes. he was happy with it but then he is a nutter lol

Last edited by peanuthead; 08/04/2009 10:57.
Re: #BHP vs MPG [Re: ] #809877
08/04/2009 11:06
08/04/2009 11:06

P
peanuthead
Unregistered
peanuthead
Unregistered
P



i recon acttully 4.5k with the bits and you would be in there with a uprated clutch and so on.
to be fair though 400bhp coop should be worthn the money and be very quick.

also i recon that you would driven day to day achive 10mpg better than you would at 340bhp and the difference is price on parts is maore due to a rebuild but that coule be recouped.

Re: #BHP vs MPG [Re: JohnS] #809961
08/04/2009 12:28
08/04/2009 12:28

J
JIM16vt
Unregistered
JIM16vt
Unregistered
J



Me too, coupe for bhp and fun

turbo diesel run around for mpg and genral running around in confort and economal movement.

Re: #BHP vs MPG [Re: ] #809965
08/04/2009 12:32
08/04/2009 12:32

P
peanuthead
Unregistered
peanuthead
Unregistered
P



well i just think that unless i get really rich then i want one car that does it all and a coop that could get 35-40mpg driving carfully but has the neck breaking power when putting my foot down would be ideal.

out of intrest if i went from 300bhp to 400bhp i doubt any parts really are interchangable so i was just going to save and go for the 400bhp from the off or do you think its worth hit 300bhp first?

Re: #BHP vs MPG [Re: ] #809974
08/04/2009 12:41
08/04/2009 12:41

E
eldinho
Unregistered
eldinho
Unregistered
E



most of the parts you are going to use getting 300bhp will still be used getting 400bhp. The only things that you won't are the turbo and the map. Just go for a downpipe which fits onto a GT series turbo and also a clutch which will support 400bhp (I know clutches are rated to torque wink )

300bhp

GT28R
FMIC
Full Exhaust
Walbro Fuel Pump with wiring mod
SIP with Filter
EBC
Dumpvalve
Some sort of map/chip

400bhp

GT****
Rods
Pistons
Flowed head
Larger injectors
Bigger MAF
Maybe Cams??
Remap

Re: #BHP vs MPG [Re: ] #809990
08/04/2009 12:58
08/04/2009 12:58

P
peanuthead
Unregistered
peanuthead
Unregistered
P



another idea would be to install a gt30r say for 400bhp and the fmic, down pipe, full exhaust,welbro fuel pump,sipand map it on a low boost setting and deal with slightly more lag and then build the engine up and add the forged bottom end, head, injectors, maf,cams and then get mapper later on?

Re: #BHP vs MPG [Re: ] #809994
08/04/2009 13:08
08/04/2009 13:08

E
eldinho
Unregistered
eldinho
Unregistered
E



maybe, but for the little money you are going to lose by the time you have sold the GT28R (presuming you bought it secondhand) I would run a smaller turbo. It won't be much fun having a big turbo with no headwork.

Re: #BHP vs MPG [Re: ] #810007
08/04/2009 13:18
08/04/2009 13:18
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 882
Banbury
djmobi Offline OP
Enjoying the ride
djmobi  Offline OP
Enjoying the ride

Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 882
Banbury
Just to set JIM16VT's mind at rest. When I asked the original question I wasnt trying to find out what I can do to improve MPG, I was just wondering if there are certain mods that can improve both BHP and MPG. IMO if you can get the horse power and keep the same MPG or improve it, that makes financial sense for those who cant afford to run 2 cars.


Back Owning a Coupe
Re: #BHP vs MPG [Re: djmobi] #810028
08/04/2009 13:38
08/04/2009 13:38

J
JIM16vt
Unregistered
JIM16vt
Unregistered
J



Ok mate, one thing I do know is keeping air filter clean helps. And also just genral looking afterr and maintaing car too.

As for the mods I have always thought that it makes mpg go up, who knows tho.

Re: #BHP vs MPG [Re: ] #810039
08/04/2009 13:53
08/04/2009 13:53

P
peanuthead
Unregistered
peanuthead
Unregistered
P



basicly headwork and a decent map will increace mpg and bhp together but head work isn't worth it unless rebulding the bottom end so really just a decent map and keep the car serviced well.

Re: #BHP vs MPG [Re: ] #810139
08/04/2009 16:12
08/04/2009 16:12

J
JIM16vt
Unregistered
JIM16vt
Unregistered
J



Supose everyone has there own view and story on how they want there coupe.

IMO, tho there is always going to be a issue with burning MPG in a 2L-turbo

To me it seems crazy talking about trying to save petrol with a engine like that.

Re: #BHP vs MPG [Re: ] #810141
08/04/2009 16:16
08/04/2009 16:16

P
peanuthead
Unregistered
peanuthead
Unregistered
P



i know mate i wasn't really being serious. that is just what you tell the missis why you have to get a remap and a bigger turbo lol
it will get better mpg but you wouldn't just doing it for that but more the fun factor.

Re: #BHP vs MPG [Re: ] #810731
09/04/2009 12:00
09/04/2009 12:00
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 882
Banbury
djmobi Offline OP
Enjoying the ride
djmobi  Offline OP
Enjoying the ride

Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 882
Banbury
I agree with JIM16vt. There is no point buying a 2litre turbo engined car and then worrying about fuel costs, I just want to make sure that when I get mine (Hopefully next month) and start doing some work on it, I dont end up going a bit too far and ending up with a car thats a massive amount of fun, but I can only use it on the weekends because I cant afford to put petrol in the tank.


Back Owning a Coupe
Re: #BHP vs MPG [Re: ] #810748
09/04/2009 12:26
09/04/2009 12:26

S
suba
Unregistered
suba
Unregistered
S



Bull - why re-build the bottom end if it does not need it?

Re: #BHP vs MPG [Re: djmobi] #810751
09/04/2009 12:31
09/04/2009 12:31

S
suba
Unregistered
suba
Unregistered
S



Why not just get a big V8 then? If you only want one car to do everything and a lot of miles then a turbo gives you the best of both worlds.

I'll sum this up. A flowed head a good map = efficient engine for cruising and more MPG.

However....

High boost and a big turbo mean when you put your foot down MPG will be in single figures, so depending on how you drive I reckon the average is probably about the same. The only exception is if you do a lot of motorway miles.

Re: #BHP vs MPG [Re: ] #810803
09/04/2009 13:23
09/04/2009 13:23

J
JIM16vt
Unregistered
JIM16vt
Unregistered
J



Why not get a v8?

For me tubos are much more fun to drive than Nateraly asperarated cars,Not matter how fast they are. Plus it is alot easyer and mcheaper to mod and increase power of a turbo than it is with non-turbo.

Re: #BHP vs MPG [Re: ] #810809
09/04/2009 13:28
09/04/2009 13:28

S
suba
Unregistered
suba
Unregistered
S



fine - but they are also better on fuel on a run - so you are onto a winner there!

Re: #BHP vs MPG [Re: ] #810816
09/04/2009 13:37
09/04/2009 13:37

T
TurboJ
Unregistered
TurboJ
Unregistered
T



Originally Posted By: suba
Bull - why re-build the bottom end if it does not need it?


Keeps you away from the MRS laugh

Re: #BHP vs MPG [Re: ] #810954
09/04/2009 17:15
09/04/2009 17:15

J
JIM16vt
Unregistered
JIM16vt
Unregistered
J



Suba the thing is , a V8 will kill the fuel weather it has 5 liters or eight. Turbo or not engine that size with 24 valves and 6+ cylinder will kill fuel.

Think tho, knowbody who buyes cars with engines like that gives a crap about the mpg.

Page 2 of 2 1 2

Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.1
(Release build 20190129)
PHP: 7.3.33 Page Time: 0.017s Queries: 14 (0.007s) Memory: 0.8359 MB (Peak: 1.0035 MB) Data Comp: Off Server Time: 2024-04-29 02:43:59 UTC