Forums69
Topics113,624
Posts1,341,336
Members1,807
|
Most Online731 Jan 14th, 2020
|
|
|
0-60, 0-100mph times std and tuned?
#821357
26/04/2009 23:15
26/04/2009 23:15
|
bazza_c
Unregistered
|
bazza_c
Unregistered
|
What sort of performance are any of you guys achieveing with standard and tuned 20VT's? The original Autocar test reckoned 0-60 in 6.0 and 0-100 in 14 secs. However, I can't say I've been in a std 20VT (including my own) that feels anywhere near this quick. I guess the tuned boys will be closer or better than this, but by how much? Share your experiences here.
|
|
|
Re: 0-60, 0-100mph times std and tuned?
[Re: ]
#821374
26/04/2009 23:48
26/04/2009 23:48
|
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 19,937 North wales
pinin_prestatyn
Forum veteran
|
Forum veteran
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 19,937
North wales
|
Standard varies on the tyres, launch, surface, but You can tease a 6-second dash to 60 usually, and I don't know about the 0-100 but I was doing the quarter in about 15 seconds normally, unless it was an exceptionally fast run and it dipped into the high 14's. Tuned? Well take your pic. My best was 5.72 secs to 60 and a 14 sec dead 1/4 with breathing mods and a G-Tech 1. We've had sub 12-sec 1/4's before now (flea and Mavric) If you want a pretty accurate measurement of your car's performance, buy a G-Tech performance Pro meter cheap off ebay and find a nice quiet road. They are accurate to within 1% providing the road is flat. You'll notice how easy it is to fluff the launch causing a 7 second-plus launch and crappy quarter. It really is all about the launch if you want to get any decent results and in the rain? laughable!
Coopless!
|
|
|
Re: 0-60, 0-100mph times std and tuned?
[Re: pinin_prestatyn]
#821397
27/04/2009 06:21
27/04/2009 06:21
|
MiniPit
Unregistered
|
MiniPit
Unregistered
|
Interesting thread! I'm actually doing 80-200 km/h (50-125 MPH?) in 16 seconds. I made 19.5 or 20 seconds when my car was full stock. I have a 20VT with decat + free flow catback and my own eprom (250 HP?) I'm going forged/balanced soon + FMIC + light Headwork + 3" DP + GT3071R-WG + 440cc + lots of other parts and i hope for 10 seconds. 9.9 seconds will be my dream
Last edited by MiniPit; 27/04/2009 06:24. Reason: Bad English again :)
|
|
|
Re: 0-60, 0-100mph times std and tuned?
[Re: ]
#821416
27/04/2009 08:44
27/04/2009 08:44
|
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,829 kidderminster
nick_d
My life on the forum
|
My life on the forum
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,829
kidderminster
|
0-60 is so so difficult to get right in the coupe... I'm guessing i'm between 5 - 5.5 secs to 60!! 60 - 100 is a much better measurement for coupe performance... Filmed mine recently then timed it ( allowing for my peedo to be approx 10% out i timed from 66 - 110.... which i did in 5.8 secs!! Which surprised me, currently running 306 bhp tho! Nick
368bhp @ 1.5 bar
|
|
|
Re: 0-60, 0-100mph times std and tuned?
[Re: Nigel]
#821475
27/04/2009 10:35
27/04/2009 10:35
|
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 5,390 Essex
Trappy
Forum is my life
|
Forum is my life
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 5,390
Essex
|
Autocar got a 0100mph of 14.5s in the original 1996 doad test of the 20vT but then recorded only a 15s in the 0-100-0mph article a few years later. Just a little detail but still important. Flea did a redline day a few years back, the results of which I've uploaded here He estimates that the car was making 390bhp at the time.
F****** b****** thing...
|
|
|
Re: 0-60, 0-100mph times std and tuned?
[Re: Trappy]
#821483
27/04/2009 10:46
27/04/2009 10:46
|
peanuthead
Unregistered
|
peanuthead
Unregistered
|
what would you say a 260bhp coop would make trappy and a 300bhp coop? i remeber you doing a chart a little while ago but i can't find it
|
|
|
Re: 0-60, 0-100mph times std and tuned?
[Re: ]
#821897
27/04/2009 22:25
27/04/2009 22:25
|
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 5,390 Essex
Trappy
Forum is my life
|
Forum is my life
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 5,390
Essex
|
Here are the numbers it brings back peanuthead
260bhp 300bhp
0-30mph: 2.4 2.4
0-40mph: 3.3 3.2
0-50mph: 4.6 4.4
0-60mph: 5.6 5.4
0-70mph: 7.3 6.8
0-80mph: 9.2 8.6
0-90mph: 10.9 10.2
0-100mph: 13.2 12.1
0-110mph: 16.3 14.8
0-120mph: 19.5 17.5
0-130mph: 25.0 22.1
It is very important to remember the difference in performance that even a few minor mods can make. The boost limit overide will HUGELY improve 2nd gear performance as it removes the boost limit, giving up to 60ft/lbs of extra torque in the lower gears. I reckon it would give knock 3 tenths off the standard cars 0-60mph.
F****** b****** thing...
|
|
|
Re: 0-60, 0-100mph times std and tuned?
[Re: Trappy]
#821923
27/04/2009 22:53
27/04/2009 22:53
|
peanuthead
Unregistered
|
peanuthead
Unregistered
|
so a 300bhp coop is about the same as a e36m3 evo if it hits its actully 321 power output? i guess more likely a m3 e46 rival then? getting 0-60 yimes like that would be really good. 60-120 mph i bet the coop is in its eliment?
|
|
|
Re: 0-60, 0-100mph times std and tuned?
[Re: Trappy]
#821970
28/04/2009 07:49
28/04/2009 07:49
|
suba
Unregistered
|
suba
Unregistered
|
There is NOT a boost limit in 1st and 2nd gear in a 20vt.
|
|
|
Re: 0-60, 0-100mph times std and tuned?
[Re: Per]
#821972
28/04/2009 07:54
28/04/2009 07:54
|
suba
Unregistered
|
suba
Unregistered
|
No it does not - it just has a normal linear powerband rather than a turbo.
As you start going over 300bhp in a coupe the powerband is going to suffer - a bigger turbo will not spool at 2,500 like the standard car. Below 4,000 rpm an E46 M3 would have a significant advantage.
|
|
|
Re: 0-60, 0-100mph times std and tuned?
[Re: ]
#821973
28/04/2009 08:14
28/04/2009 08:14
|
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,829 kidderminster
nick_d
My life on the forum
|
My life on the forum
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,829
kidderminster
|
There is NOT a boost limit in 1st and 2nd gear in a 20vt. But there is on the 16vt??? Probably a good thing to be honest as if (when) the wheels start spinning in 2nd i'll prob only see at most 1 bar untill i'mm into 3rd!! Is that chart for just 20vt coops as my 60-100 is alot quicker than 6.7 sec!! (i'm running 306 bhp) Nick
Last edited by nick_d; 28/04/2009 08:14.
368bhp @ 1.5 bar
|
|
|
Re: 0-60, 0-100mph times std and tuned?
[Re: ]
#822067
28/04/2009 11:01
28/04/2009 11:01
|
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 5,390 Essex
Trappy
Forum is my life
|
Forum is my life
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 5,390
Essex
|
There is NOT a boost limit in 1st and 2nd gear in a 20vt. Sure, but there is a boost RISE limiter in all gears but it only works in 1st and 2nd as these are the only gears that a standard car can trigger it in. It effectivley limits torque available in these gears.
F****** b****** thing...
|
|
|
Re: 0-60, 0-100mph times std and tuned?
[Re: Trappy]
#822081
28/04/2009 11:15
28/04/2009 11:15
|
Bigtop
Unregistered
|
Bigtop
Unregistered
|
so, if looking at a boost gauge, what difference can you see in 1st and 2nd gear between a standard and chipped coupe? will a chipped coupe boost higher in 1st and 2nd? in my coupe, 2nd gear boosts to 17psi quite easily and really pulls,1st gear seems to be a bit less unless i realy put my foot down.
|
|
|
Re: 0-60, 0-100mph times std and tuned?
[Re: ]
#822149
28/04/2009 12:38
28/04/2009 12:38
|
jtm
Unregistered
|
jtm
Unregistered
|
2100rpm 77hp /246nm 3300rpm 177hp/360nm ( seems high to me ) 4000rpm 205hp/350nm
those are from e46 M3
|
|
|
Re: 0-60, 0-100mph times std and tuned?
[Re: ]
#822410
28/04/2009 19:07
28/04/2009 19:07
|
Kenneth
Unregistered
|
Kenneth
Unregistered
|
my 0-60 is around 4 sec, hope to get it a little better when i get it finetune.
|
|
|
Re: 0-60, 0-100mph times std and tuned?
[Re: Trappy]
#822417
28/04/2009 19:17
28/04/2009 19:17
|
suba
Unregistered
|
suba
Unregistered
|
Nope - the ecu cuts the boost on the standard chip if the revs rise too quickly, i.e wheelspin. No wheelspin then no boost cut.
|
|
|
Re: 0-60, 0-100mph times std and tuned?
[Re: ]
#822423
28/04/2009 19:25
28/04/2009 19:25
|
westcoupe
Unregistered
|
westcoupe
Unregistered
|
i have a big turbo on my car and i love comparing e46 m3's with my car and to be honest i destroy them from start to finish and yes i mean from stand still and from rolling,just becoming a pointless comparison,wouldnt mind one as a every day driver though
|
|
|
Re: 0-60, 0-100mph times std and tuned?
[Re: ]
#822466
28/04/2009 20:22
28/04/2009 20:22
|
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 17,367 Staffordshire
Nigel
Forum veteran
|
Forum veteran
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 17,367
Staffordshire
|
my 0-60 is around 4 sec, hope to get it a little better when i get it finetune. in a Coupe? That's a bit optimistic
|
|
|
Re: 0-60, 0-100mph times std and tuned?
[Re: Nigel]
#822470
28/04/2009 20:25
28/04/2009 20:25
|
yogisdk
Unregistered
|
yogisdk
Unregistered
|
Its not a coupe anymore, its 4x4
|
|
|
Re: 0-60, 0-100mph times std and tuned?
[Re: ]
#822472
28/04/2009 20:28
28/04/2009 20:28
|
yogisdk
Unregistered
|
yogisdk
Unregistered
|
Do you have any 0-60 figures for yours Nigel? Last year I recorded 5.1 to 62mph, and now its much better with launch control and traction control, so I am guessing my 0-60 would be around 4.9 now Will do some measurements soon...
|
|
|
Re: 0-60, 0-100mph times std and tuned?
[Re: ]
#822562
28/04/2009 22:30
28/04/2009 22:30
|
suba
Unregistered
|
suba
Unregistered
|
i have a big turbo on my car and i love comparing e46 m3's with my car and to be honest i destroy them from start to finish and yes i mean from stand still and from rolling,just becoming a pointless comparison,wouldnt mind one as a every day driver though I dont care what turbo or spec of coupe you are in - you will not beat one off the line unless you get a PERFECT launch, and the M3 utterly fluffs it - or can't be ar*ed. When rolling you will also not 'destroy' one in a straight line until you have a 400bhp+ coupe.
|
|
|
Re: 0-60, 0-100mph times std and tuned?
[Re: ]
#822594
28/04/2009 23:27
28/04/2009 23:27
|
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 697
TurboNick
Enjoying the ride
|
Enjoying the ride
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 697
|
i duno if im just a s**t drive but i recon my 0-60 time is worse than standered i rele wanna go in someone elses coupe similar to mine to compare. i just get pure wheel spin in 1st no matter how much i ballence the clutch n fether the throttle. although my iphone time me a 5.2 sec 0-60 time but fccuk know how accurate that is.
Last edited by TurboNick; 28/04/2009 23:37.
|
|
|
Re: 0-60, 0-100mph times std and tuned?
[Re: TurboNick]
#822601
28/04/2009 23:50
28/04/2009 23:50
|
suba
Unregistered
|
suba
Unregistered
|
It wont be accurate. I really can't see why anyone is bothered about the 0-60 time of a performance car - it really depends on the drivetrain and weight of the car and the launch. The claimed figures can't be replicated without a fair bit of luck - and even then it a very poor reflection on how quick a car is in the real world. The statistic is for meaningless pub arguements: 'my car does 0-60 0.2 of a second faster than yours according to the figures in the back of evo, and they gave it a good writeup, which is the only reason I bought one.....' Stick drag tyres on a 20vt (not AWD converted one) with 400bhp+ and you'll get a 5 second 0-60 or a bit less. Add another 200bhp and I doubt it will change much.
|
|
|
Re: 0-60, 0-100mph times std and tuned?
[Re: ]
#822617
29/04/2009 03:57
29/04/2009 03:57
|
westcoupe
Unregistered
|
westcoupe
Unregistered
|
ok then suba i cant destroy m3's with my coupe from standing or from rolling i must be lying
|
|
|
Re: 0-60, 0-100mph times std and tuned?
[Re: ]
#822620
29/04/2009 06:27
29/04/2009 06:27
|
jtm
Unregistered
|
jtm
Unregistered
|
BMW M3 2002 : 343hp/365nm
0-100kmh 5,2 sec 0-160kmh 11,6 sec 0-200kmh 18,6 sec
so 100-200kmh is 13,4 sec . well I have to say, that is easy to beat at least..
|
|
|
Re: 0-60, 0-100mph times std and tuned?
[Re: ]
#822622
29/04/2009 06:29
29/04/2009 06:29
|
jtm
Unregistered
|
jtm
Unregistered
|
there was another result too, there was 0-100 4,8 sec 0-160 10,9 sec 0-200 16,8 sec
so 100-200kmh is 12.0 sec
still thats easy to beat ..
|
|
|
Re: 0-60, 0-100mph times std and tuned?
[Re: ]
#822624
29/04/2009 06:32
29/04/2009 06:32
|
jtm
Unregistered
|
jtm
Unregistered
|
one more result was found:
seems that 100 - 200kmh with E46 M3 is around 12.0 -13.4 sec
|
|
|
Re: 0-60, 0-100mph times std and tuned?
[Re: ]
#822639
29/04/2009 07:58
29/04/2009 07:58
|
yogisdk
Unregistered
|
yogisdk
Unregistered
|
Would be also quite handy if we could post 1/8 mile and 1/4 mile times
|
|
|
Re: 0-60, 0-100mph times std and tuned?
[Re: ]
#822715
29/04/2009 09:58
29/04/2009 09:58
|
peanuthead
Unregistered
|
peanuthead
Unregistered
|
i thought a m46 m3 0-62 was 4.7 seconds and 0-100 mpg 11.7 which makes it bloody quick. i borrowed my uncles e46 m3 csl for a month and its was quite a bit quicker than my skyline at the time which was running 320bhp and that again was quite a bit quicker than my stage one coop. i would surgest you would need about 300 bhp to keep with one rolling and 360bhp to try a keep up with one off the line. then the handle and brakes to compare with so really a well set up 360bhp coop driven well to keep up from standing or around a track.
but thats not the point of this and lets face it a decent e46 m3 will set you back 15k compared to a coop. lukes car for example would really bother a e46 and his can be bought for 4.5k!
if i was to buy something for that money i would get something like johns's car for 10k and save 5 for running the car for a year lol.
|
|
|
Re: 0-60, 0-100mph times std and tuned?
[Re: ]
#822729
29/04/2009 10:32
29/04/2009 10:32
|
suba
Unregistered
|
suba
Unregistered
|
I doubt you would see any real difference in a 0-60 time between a 300bhp coupe and a 360 bhp coupe on road tyres. The issue is the FWD traction not the power.
I've owned a very well setup 20VT running over 340 bhp, and driven an E46 M3 several times now. When rolling the 20vt was noticeably faster (and feels it from the turbo kick) - but it would not destroy the M3 by any means. It would also keep up in the corners on a track - with the driver pushing hard, and getting the most from the car, but would not be much faster overall with the M3 making up time on the brakes and getting the power down earlier.
On bumpy lanes the M3 would romp away with the 20vt bouncing everywhere on the coilovers.
A very good e46 M3 will set you back 12K now, not 15.
I prefered my 20vt overall though - but as I said you would need to be running 400bhp+ to really pull away from the BMW, and the extra power will not help you in the corners - if anything the extra lag from a big turbo will do quite the opposite.
|
|
|
Re: 0-60, 0-100mph times std and tuned?
[Re: ]
#822734
29/04/2009 10:36
29/04/2009 10:36
|
peanuthead
Unregistered
|
peanuthead
Unregistered
|
the reason i maybe think it would run away from the coop in the coners as it was a csl m3! a standard m3 maybe not then.
well i have been looking but reall a low milage e46 whichis say 7 years old is still about 15k. i would rather buy a 15k m3 and know it won't break than risk a 12k m3 and worry about stupid bmw labour rates lol.
|
|
|
Re: 0-60, 0-100mph times std and tuned?
[Re: ]
#822743
29/04/2009 10:48
29/04/2009 10:48
|
suba
Unregistered
|
suba
Unregistered
|
A good friend of mine just bought an immaculate one for 12K - 02 plate. There are specialists for them.....
M3 csl by all accounts is a different animal - having not driven one I can't comment first hand though.
|
|
|
Re: 0-60, 0-100mph times std and tuned?
[Re: ]
#822775
29/04/2009 11:28
29/04/2009 11:28
|
peanuthead
Unregistered
|
peanuthead
Unregistered
|
ok fair enough prices must have dropped. i would like one. i love the csl but don't think its worth the extra money over a standard m3.
|
|
|
Re: 0-60, 0-100mph times std and tuned?
[Re: ]
#822888
29/04/2009 13:45
29/04/2009 13:45
|
jtm
Unregistered
|
jtm
Unregistered
|
those figures are taken from magazine tests so they are correct, not what manufacture claims
|
|
|
Re: 0-60, 0-100mph times std and tuned?
[Re: ]
#822919
29/04/2009 14:23
29/04/2009 14:23
|
suba
Unregistered
|
suba
Unregistered
|
possibly a slightly nieve comment....
|
|
|
Re: 0-60, 0-100mph times std and tuned?
[Re: ]
#822931
29/04/2009 14:34
29/04/2009 14:34
|
westcoupe
Unregistered
|
westcoupe
Unregistered
|
hello i forgot to mention i am running just under 400bhp
Last edited by westcoupe; 29/04/2009 14:35.
|
|
|
Re: 0-60, 0-100mph times std and tuned?
[Re: ]
#822932
29/04/2009 14:37
29/04/2009 14:37
|
westcoupe
Unregistered
|
westcoupe
Unregistered
|
i have been looking at 1/4 mile times on an m3 e46 and have noticed that they are only getting mid 13 seconds and i did manage a 13.2 @ 0.9bar of boost unmapped and my car is now mapped to 1.5bar all the way to the redline on a gt3071r,car is very capable of mid 12's now mapped
Last edited by westcoupe; 29/04/2009 14:39.
|
|
|
Re: 0-60, 0-100mph times std and tuned?
[Re: ]
#822957
29/04/2009 15:13
29/04/2009 15:13
|
suba
Unregistered
|
suba
Unregistered
|
hello i forgot to mention i am running just under 400bhp Only a small detail....
|
|
|
Re: 0-60, 0-100mph times std and tuned?
[Re: ]
#823129
29/04/2009 19:48
29/04/2009 19:48
|
westcoupe
Unregistered
|
westcoupe
Unregistered
|
well i am just getting my other engine rebuilt at the moment nigel and hopefully it should be done in time for
totb,so should be joining you and leighton there,also i forgot to mention my car is stripped and has only one
purpose,nigel i remember you saying in a thread on tyres that you use toyo t1r's and dont get no spin in
2nd,well i upgraded to these cos i had no traction when running my gt28rs and they solved that problem,well
once leighton mapped my car with the gt30 on it,my car wheel spins coming on to boost in 2nd now but will still
say that tyres are so important.
Last edited by westcoupe; 29/04/2009 19:48.
|
|
|
Re: 0-60, 0-100mph times std and tuned?
[Re: ]
#823136
29/04/2009 19:57
29/04/2009 19:57
|
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 12,295 Sandhurst
Begbie
Ex El Presidente
|
Ex El Presidente
I AM a Coop
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 12,295
Sandhurst
|
It's good to hear you want to be in TOTB as well Are you doing anything with it being stripped out i.e. rollcage
Your car is Usain Bolt with wellies
|
|
|
Re: 0-60, 0-100mph times std and tuned?
[Re: Begbie]
#823154
29/04/2009 20:31
29/04/2009 20:31
|
westcoupe
Unregistered
|
westcoupe
Unregistered
|
i dont really want a roll cage as it is more weight,but im not really interested in the track though
|
|
|
Re: 0-60, 0-100mph times std and tuned?
[Re: ]
#823263
29/04/2009 22:46
29/04/2009 22:46
|
BoostMeCoupeUp
Unregistered
|
BoostMeCoupeUp
Unregistered
|
i have a big turbo on my car and i love comparing e46 m3's with my car and to be honest i destroy them from start to finish and yes i mean from stand still and from rolling,just becoming a pointless comparison,wouldnt mind one as a every day driver though I dont care what turbo or spec of coupe you are in - you will not beat one off the line unless you get a PERFECT launch, and the M3 utterly fluffs it - or can't be ar*ed. When rolling you will also not 'destroy' one in a straight line until you have a 400bhp+ coupe. i beg to differ in the nicest possible way with suba not westcoupe. my freind works for sitner bmw he has brought home many e46 m3s and iv had a few comparisons in my 249.6 bhp coupe hard top im v slightly faster on the move 40mph+ soft top i pull slightly more on it close though so a 400 break coupe will totaly TROUNCE a std e46 m3 on the move it would be a total walk over more power less weight. I don't care if anyone doubts this if they do they are wrong. my coupe ran 1/4 mile in 13.9 a e46 will do that im sure but will lauch better
Last edited by BoostMeCoupeUp; 29/04/2009 22:53.
|
|
|
Re: 0-60, 0-100mph times std and tuned?
[Re: Jumeirah]
#823277
29/04/2009 23:18
29/04/2009 23:18
|
BoostMeCoupeUp
Unregistered
|
BoostMeCoupeUp
Unregistered
|
250 bhp 0 - 103mph 13.92 at pod though, good surface so im sure std coupe will do 14.6 NEW focus rs in new autocar mag 0-100 13.9 apparently
|
|
|
Re: 0-60, 0-100mph times std and tuned?
[Re: ]
#823293
29/04/2009 23:54
29/04/2009 23:54
|
MattW
Unregistered
|
MattW
Unregistered
|
0-anything means nothing in real world performance, just top trumps figures...
|
|
|
Re: 0-60, 0-100mph times std and tuned?
[Re: ]
#823319
30/04/2009 01:37
30/04/2009 01:37
|
BoostMeCoupeUp
Unregistered
|
BoostMeCoupeUp
Unregistered
|
agreed there 60-100 means alot more in real world unless on a drag strip
|
|
|
Re: 0-60, 0-100mph times std and tuned?
[Re: ]
#823405
30/04/2009 10:01
30/04/2009 10:01
|
dink
Unregistered
|
dink
Unregistered
|
Mine does 0-60 in 3.7 seconds and makes E46 M3's look ridiculous. Standard trim only an air filter and a remap. Top speed around 200mph. Ok ok it's not a coop! http://www.lanciahf.eu/TEMP/Corvette/ma_Z.jpg
|
|
|
Re: 0-60, 0-100mph times std and tuned?
[Re: ]
#823715
30/04/2009 18:57
30/04/2009 18:57
|
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 5,390 Essex
Trappy
Forum is my life
|
Forum is my life
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 5,390
Essex
|
agreed there 60-100 means alot more in real world unless on a drag strip I'm not too keen on this either anymore. You're much better off taking each 10mph increment and working out the distance travelled over that time by using simple acceleration/distance formulas. I'll give you accurate distance travelled for any increment, for just about any car you could want numbers for. If I can't, I'll find them I noticed the 5.7 0-60mph and 13.9 0-100mph for the new Focus RS today in this weeks Autocar also. 300bhp and 1467kgs is not too hot though the handling will surely be something else. A 280bhp coop you have the measure of one in a straight line IMO.
F****** b****** thing...
|
|
|
Re: 0-60, 0-100mph times std and tuned?
[Re: Trappy]
#823761
30/04/2009 20:42
30/04/2009 20:42
|
MattW
Unregistered
|
MattW
Unregistered
|
agreed there 60-100 means alot more in real world unless on a drag strip I'm not too keen on this either anymore. I am, but only because it works in the Coupe's favour. You can do 60-100 in the coupe on boost all the time without changing gear, but some cars may require a gear change or be well out of their peak power band at the start of it.
|
|
|
Re: 0-60, 0-100mph times std and tuned?
[Re: ]
#823774
30/04/2009 21:07
30/04/2009 21:07
|
yogisdk
Unregistered
|
yogisdk
Unregistered
|
Just checked my Gtech RR results from last year, 0-60 MPH in 5.067 secs.
|
|
|
Re: 0-60, 0-100mph times std and tuned?
[Re: ]
#823908
30/04/2009 23:35
30/04/2009 23:35
|
bazza_c
Unregistered
|
bazza_c
Unregistered
|
30-70 or 30-100mph is a good indicator, cos it takes out the whole 1st gear wheel spinning issue. Also 30-70 is usually v. close to the 0-60 figure and easy to replicate on a decent dual carriagewa. Autocar recorded an impressive 5.4 sec 30-70 figure IIRC.
|
|
|
Re: 0-60, 0-100mph times std and tuned?
[Re: nick_d]
#824189
01/05/2009 14:42
01/05/2009 14:42
|
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 5,390 Essex
Trappy
Forum is my life
|
Forum is my life
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 5,390
Essex
|
Thing is, you really NEED a Vbox Performance Box to ensure that your speed is accurate. Of course this means that you'll also have increment data recorded every tenth of a second.
Forum, purchqse one and then hire a decent run way. We can get good numbers for all cars, and I can then run ALL of the number through the calculator for 0-400m and 0-1000m times and terminals.
F****** b****** thing...
|
|
|
Re: 0-60, 0-100mph times std and tuned?
[Re: Trappy]
#824191
01/05/2009 14:43
01/05/2009 14:43
|
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 5,390 Essex
Trappy
Forum is my life
|
Forum is my life
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 5,390
Essex
|
The best measure of a cars performance, is to find out who is in front after x seconds or metres, from x speed.
I can do this if I have good numbers.
Last edited by Trappy; 01/05/2009 14:45.
F****** b****** thing...
|
|
|
Re: 0-60, 0-100mph times std and tuned?
[Re: Trappy]
#824507
02/05/2009 09:57
02/05/2009 09:57
|
BoostMeCoupeUp
Unregistered
|
BoostMeCoupeUp
Unregistered
|
[quote=Trappy]Here are the numbers it brings back peanuthead
coupe 260bhp 300bhp 0-30mph: 2.4 2.4 0-40mph: 3.3 3.2 0-50mph: 4.6 4.4 0-60mph: 5.6 5.4 0-70mph: 7.3 6.8 0-80mph: 9.2 8.6 0-90mph: 10.9 10.2 0-100mph: 13.2 12.1 0-110mph: 16.3 14.8 0-120mph: 19.5 17.5 0-130mph: 25.0 22.1
so a 260 couupe is faster than the new so called hyper hatch focus rs in a straight line any way. Evo magazine resutls using timing gear 0-60 5.9 0-100 14.2 0.130 27.0 quater mile 14.5 @ 101.2 mph
Last edited by BoostMeCoupeUp; 02/05/2009 09:58.
|
|
|
Re: 0-60, 0-100mph times std and tuned?
[Re: ]
#824525
02/05/2009 10:36
02/05/2009 10:36
|
bazza_c
Unregistered
|
bazza_c
Unregistered
|
I've just changed dump valve and had thermostat changed cos it wasn't reaching temp correctly. Strapped my Vbox Mini onto the windscreen and achieved the following
0.00 0 0.00 0.00 10.00 00:00.96 0.00 2.07 20.00 00:01.82 0.00 7.78 30.00 00:02.62 0.01 16.70 40.00 00:03.72 0.02 33.96 50.00 00:05.18 0.04 62.95 60.00 00:06.64 0.06 98.85 70.00 00:08.83 0.10 162.99 80.00 00:11.00 0.15 235.80 90.00 00:13.71 0.21 339.83 95.47 00:15.22 0.25 402.00 100.00 00:16.67 0.29 465.83
So in summary, 0-60 in 6.64 with not too much wheelspin, 30-70 in 6.21sec, and 0-100 in 16.67. 1/4 mile in 15.22 at 95.47mph on concrete road surface. 60-100 in 10.03 sec.
Car is stock 20VT 95,000 miles- running Pirelli P6000 tyres and a Bailey DV26 dump Valve. Boost gauge to be fitted - possibly an EBV clean and then a RR session to see if power can be improved. The rev limiter cuts in at 68mph in 2nd gear which means a gear change interrupts the 30-70 time. The Autocar test car achieved 72mph in 2nd, hence the better 5.4 sec 30-70 time.
Overall pleased, but could do better. Wouldn't mind trying some 'sticky' front tyres, GTEC1 and toying with the PRV, but don't like the thought of ECU not being able to cut boost in an emergency.
|
|
|
Re: 0-60, 0-100mph times std and tuned?
[Re: ]
#824541
02/05/2009 10:47
02/05/2009 10:47
|
BoostMeCoupeUp
Unregistered
|
BoostMeCoupeUp
Unregistered
|
yeah get gtec 1 and maybe a blueflame mine came down into 13s to 100 with just gtec and filter amazing performance upgrade for such a puny amount of money the gtec.
|
|
|
Re: 0-60, 0-100mph times std and tuned?
[Re: ]
#824548
02/05/2009 10:57
02/05/2009 10:57
|
bazza_c
Unregistered
|
bazza_c
Unregistered
|
[quote=Trappy]Here are the numbers it brings back peanuthead
coupe 260bhp 300bhp 0-30mph: 2.4 2.4 0-40mph: 3.3 3.2 0-50mph: 4.6 4.4 0-60mph: 5.6 5.4 0-70mph: 7.3 6.8 0-80mph: 9.2 8.6 0-90mph: 10.9 10.2 0-100mph: 13.2 12.1 0-110mph: 16.3 14.8 0-120mph: 19.5 17.5 0-130mph: 25.0 22.1
so a 260 couupe is faster than the new so called hyper hatch focus rs in a straight line any way. Evo magazine resutls using timing gear 0-60 5.9 0-100 14.2 0.130 27.0 quater mile 14.5 @ 101.2 mph Yes but original 220bhp Coupe (when new achieved 0-60 in 6.0s, 0-100 in 14.5s , qtr mile in 14.5 sec. Can't find copy of mag to find the 0-130 time, but probably irrelevent on UK roads.
|
|
|
Re: 0-60, 0-100mph times std and tuned?
[Re: ]
#824551
02/05/2009 11:00
02/05/2009 11:00
|
bazza_c
Unregistered
|
bazza_c
Unregistered
|
Got the GTEC 1, just need to fit and get checked on the RR. However want to do a std run at RR once boost gauge is fitted. How can the rev limiter be raised so that it cuts in at 7000rpm max rather than 6900?
How much is a Blueflame on its own or fitted?
|
|
|
Re: 0-60, 0-100mph times std and tuned?
[Re: ]
#824602
02/05/2009 12:41
02/05/2009 12:41
|
BoostMeCoupeUp
Unregistered
|
BoostMeCoupeUp
Unregistered
|
i got mine for 300 quid off here second hand but was almost brand new, the 3 inch full system new is around 450 but it gave me loads of pull against my mates coupe which before hand was exactly the same speed, hence he has bought one now. Looking foward to see how much if anything it knocks off time down pod.
|
|
|
Re: 0-60, 0-100mph times std and tuned?
[Re: ]
#824623
02/05/2009 13:45
02/05/2009 13:45
|
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 5,390 Essex
Trappy
Forum is my life
|
Forum is my life
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 5,390
Essex
|
Yes but original 220bhp Coupe (when new achieved 0-60 in 6.0s, 0-100 in 14.5s , qtr mile in 14.5 sec. Can't find copy of mag to find the 0-130 time, but probably irrelevent on UK roads. Top Gear 20vT data Autocar 20vT Data
F****** b****** thing...
|
|
|
Re: 0-60, 0-100mph times std and tuned?
[Re: Trappy]
#825252
04/05/2009 00:14
04/05/2009 00:14
|
bazza_c
Unregistered
|
bazza_c
Unregistered
|
|
|
|
Re: 0-60, 0-100mph times std and tuned?
[Re: Trappy]
#825463
04/05/2009 15:16
04/05/2009 15:16
|
Bigtop
Unregistered
|
Bigtop
Unregistered
|
|
|
|
Re: 0-60, 0-100mph times std and tuned?
[Re: ]
#825475
04/05/2009 16:01
04/05/2009 16:01
|
symonh2000
Unregistered
|
symonh2000
Unregistered
|
That was on a high speed bowl IIRC, which will reduce the top speed a bit.
|
|
|
Re: 0-60, 0-100mph times std and tuned?
[Re: ]
#825485
04/05/2009 16:15
04/05/2009 16:15
|
BoostMeCoupeUp
Unregistered
|
BoostMeCoupeUp
Unregistered
|
focus rs only managed 148 on millbrook bowl take 2 mph off for tyre scrub = miles slower than fords claimed 162 mph, evo mag said dissapointing. too much hype for that car, but for ford sales is the name of the game.
|
|
|
Re: 0-60, 0-100mph times std and tuned?
[Re: ]
#825534
04/05/2009 17:29
04/05/2009 17:29
|
Johna
Unregistered
|
Johna
Unregistered
|
i have had my coop off the clock..
|
|
|
Re: 0-60, 0-100mph times std and tuned?
[Re: ]
#825589
04/05/2009 19:36
04/05/2009 19:36
|
bazza_c
Unregistered
|
bazza_c
Unregistered
|
Top Gear managed 152.1, the extra 0.1 makes a big difference Interesting that 50-70 acceleration in fifth gear is quoted as 6.2s, whereas I can only manage a best of 6.9s. The test car seemed to have a slightly higher rev limit of 7000rpm too.
Last edited by bazza_c; 04/05/2009 19:39.
|
|
|
Re: 0-60, 0-100mph times std and tuned?
[Re: ]
#825592
04/05/2009 19:38
04/05/2009 19:38
|
westcoupe
Unregistered
|
westcoupe
Unregistered
|
my car only does 150mph.........in 4th lol
|
|
|
Re: 0-60, 0-100mph times std and tuned?
[Re: ]
#825599
04/05/2009 19:47
04/05/2009 19:47
|
Johna
Unregistered
|
Johna
Unregistered
|
|
|
|
Re: 0-60, 0-100mph times std and tuned?
[Re: ]
#825611
04/05/2009 20:04
04/05/2009 20:04
|
Bigtop
Unregistered
|
Bigtop
Unregistered
|
so who was it that got 156 out of a coupe? thought that was meant to be the correct top speed. 250 kph
|
|
|
Re: 0-60, 0-100mph times std and tuned?
[Re: ]
#825676
04/05/2009 21:47
04/05/2009 21:47
|
bazza_c
Unregistered
|
bazza_c
Unregistered
|
my car only does 150mph.........in 4th lol
|
|
|
Re: 0-60, 0-100mph times std and tuned?
[Re: ]
#825930
05/05/2009 11:46
05/05/2009 11:46
|
karl_20VT
Unregistered
|
karl_20VT
Unregistered
|
my car only does 150mph.........in 4th lol HOW !!!!
|
|
|
Re: 0-60, 0-100mph times std and tuned?
[Re: ]
#825942
05/05/2009 12:02
05/05/2009 12:02
|
suba
Unregistered
|
suba
Unregistered
|
The speedo is out, non standard wheels etc.
|
|
|
Re: 0-60, 0-100mph times std and tuned?
[Re: ]
#825958
05/05/2009 12:35
05/05/2009 12:35
|
karl_20VT
Unregistered
|
karl_20VT
Unregistered
|
so either your using tractor wheels or trolley wheels
|
|
|
Re: 0-60, 0-100mph times std and tuned?
[Re: Flea]
#825993
05/05/2009 13:23
05/05/2009 13:23
|
suba
Unregistered
|
suba
Unregistered
|
That might explain it.
|
|
|
Re: 0-60, 0-100mph times std and tuned?
[Re: ]
#826062
05/05/2009 15:24
05/05/2009 15:24
|
westcoupe
Unregistered
|
westcoupe
Unregistered
|
thanks for that leighton,yes well the limiter has been raised to 7500rpm
|
|
|
|