It's in the list in the under £1k class

Have you got a link? (I'm being lazy...)

What an awful 'article' "you can pick one up for £850...be careful not to get one that has been thrashed".

Your cake sir, oh and you'd like to eat it too?

Is that not crazycoup's coupe?

its because theres one on autotrader with no engine for £850
what an idiot should be sacked for that article
its like the engineer on my coupe write off case ' well there on auto trader between a grand and' at that point I stopped him in his tracks and said my car was on 60k had leather seats and it actually did have an engine and some very tidy paintwork he gave me 3000 in the end.

Good spot, i knew it looked familiar. It's down to the number plate, which is why Kirsty call's it Angelica

I agree, very lazy bit of so-called-journalism (not that that's surprising from MSN...) but on the bright side at least they didn't trot out the usual Italian reliability myth. "surprising reliability" seemed a pretty fair comment, though it should of course be qualified by "... if properly maintained"

Why not focus on the point that they say it's a decent car and it made number 2? I think it's a good thing, if your car is in better condition, has less miles or even an engine then it's worth more. Not all coupes are worth the same. After all, it is true, you can pick them up for under a grand and it's only a quick write up, all the cars get the same level of journalism in that list, they're not picking on the car.

I might be a little bias as I've just advertised mine for £995