Fiat Coupe Forum
- Founded by Kayjey & James Northam
- Funded by the Club for the benefit of all owners
Fiat Coupe Club UK
join the club
Fiat Coupe Forum
 
» Announced
    Posting images


» Related sites
    Main club site
    fiatcoupe.net


» External data
    owners listed
 
Who's Online Now
1 registered members (slicer), 187 guests, and 3 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums69
Topics113,633
Posts1,341,401
Members1,814
Most Online731
Jan 14th, 2020
Top Posters(All Time)
barnacle 33,568
stan 32,122
Theresa 23,304
PeteP 21,522
bockers 21,071
JimO 17,917
Nigel 17,367
Edinburgh 16,844
RSS Feeds
Club Events
Club Information
Track Events
Rolling Road/RWYB
Social Events
Non-UK Events
Coupé Related Chat
Coupé Spotting
Coupé News/Press
Buying/Selling Advice
Insuring a Coupé
Basic FAQ's
How to Guides
Forum Issues
Technical Problems
General Maintenance
Styling
Tuning
Handling
ICE and Alarm
Coupés for Sale
Coupés Wanted
Parts for Sale
Parts Wanted
Group Buys
Business Forum
Other Vehicles for Sale/Wanted
Other Items for Sale/Wanted
Haggling/Offers
Ebay links
Other Cars
Other Websites
General Chat
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
2.4 conversion #1107299
26/09/2010 19:33
26/09/2010 19:33
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 106
Ireland
L
LiamM Offline OP
On a journey
LiamM  Offline OP
On a journey
L

Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 106
Ireland
I'll be building an uprated engine for my Coupe race car over the winter, and am wondering is there an advantage in fitting the 2.4 Stilo crank along with the associated uprated rods pistons etc? I'm not after big power, 400bhp is loads, but the extra torque form the 2.4 may be handy.

What are peoples opinions?

Re: 2.4 conversion [Re: LiamM] #1107345
26/09/2010 21:13
26/09/2010 21:13
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 12,295
Sandhurst
Begbie Offline
Ex El Presidente
Begbie  Offline
Ex El Presidente
I AM a Coop

Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 12,295
Sandhurst
I would speak to Nyssa7 on here about making the 2.4 up to race spec, big difference between fast road 2.4 and race spec 2.4. One of the many things would be the conrods, i believe Nyssa has made the big end made wider


Originally Posted by Jonny - After being taken out at Spa
Your car is Usain Bolt with wellies
Re: 2.4 conversion [Re: Begbie] #1107364
26/09/2010 21:44
26/09/2010 21:44

S
sediciRich
Unregistered
sediciRich
Unregistered
S



plus solid lifters

Re: 2.4 conversion [Re: LiamM] #1107650
27/09/2010 15:03
27/09/2010 15:03

N
nyssa7
Unregistered
nyssa7
Unregistered
N



Easy enough to get 400bhp and big torque from the 2.0, but after running nearly 600bhp I was looking for a bit more than 400 with appropriate torque so went for a 2.4

With no disrespect to anyone on this forum, nor any Fiat Coupe specialists, or anybody indeed - I sent my engine to a RACE engine builder for opinion in the first instance, then solution and build

Fiat have designed their rods with what appears to be massive side to side float on the big end - seems fine on road cars, my kappa 20vt has done enough miles and there's plenty on here who have done a lot more

But so far I have wrecked 5 race engines, 2 of them snapped rods, another had something give so the pistons met the valves with nothing having broken

So my RACE engine builder tells me this is an "iffy" design for a race engine, I listened

And invested a large sum in a custom set of rods designed by him and Arrows, and paid for my engine (which was yet to run) to be stripped down and rebuilt

And as Rich added, also gone down the solid lifter path as 8000 rpm and hydraulic tappets do not go well together

TBH depends on what you are racing with, how long you expect your engine to last and just how hard you're planning to thrash the hell out of it - no matter what anyone thinks, a road engine will never get the grief a RACE one does

Then the really good news is, expectto treat gearboxes as disposable items, because they won't last long either

And finally - good luck, we're both going to need that!

Re: 2.4 conversion [Re: ] #1107690
27/09/2010 15:41
27/09/2010 15:41

I
I8AV8
Unregistered
I8AV8
Unregistered
I



I prefer the approach to a wider big end with less play to the original Fiat design.

What is the difference in torque between a 2.4 and a 2.0?

Re: 2.4 conversion [Re: ] #1107841
27/09/2010 21:22
27/09/2010 21:22

N
nyssa7
Unregistered
nyssa7
Unregistered
N



Dunno yet, engine not back in the car yet, that won't happen for at least a couple of months yet. Have had cam timing set up to aim for good torque curve in preference to outright power though so won't be directly comparable to the previous engine where it was set up for power

Re: 2.4 conversion [Re: ] #1108194
28/09/2010 18:41
28/09/2010 18:41
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 581
Taiwan
DavidL Offline
Enjoying the ride
DavidL  Offline
Enjoying the ride

Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 581
Taiwan
Originally Posted By: nyssa7
Dunno yet, engine not back in the car yet, that won't happen for at least a couple of months yet. Have had cam timing set up to aim for good torque curve in preference to outright power though so won't be directly comparable to the previous engine where it was set up for power


Just my 2 cents regarding the achieving best torque... don't let the chip control when your timing variator turns off, instead use an industrial grade pressure switch to turn off the timing variator prematurely once you have reached a particular boost level. IMHO, the sole purpose of the variator (when it kicks in, i.e., early opening and closing) is to ensure a steady idle (wide lobe separation angle) and better lower end (early opening of the intake valve means you will start building compression sooner). Once it reaches a significant level of boost, which depends on how it’s tuned, you can turn off the timing variator to allow more air to flow into the cylinder as the turbo is generating enough flow, so you will need it to be closed so that it opens and closes later. JohnS mentioned something similar sometime ago, and it’ll be best to test various settings to get the best overall setup(look at where the torque chart intersects with different settings). I’m using SMC pressure switch to turn off the variator when boost is above 1 Bar and it made a world of difference.

Most turbocharged engines are “knock limited” and it’s the same for the 20VT, imagine boosting to 1.8 bar with the variator turned on (it cuts off at 4800 rpm on the standard chip and 4000rpm for novitec and G-Tec) vs. 1.8 bar with the variator turned off. For the former setup, if the peak boost level is reached before the variator is turned off, it will probably be knocking like hell, for the latter setup, with the variator turned off, it has retarded the timing by 18 degrees, which means although it will lose a bit on compression pressure, however, the turbo is now generating more air flow into the cylinder to make up for the compression loss. One more big advantage is that the air flow from the turbo is intercooled, while air compressed inside the cylinder is not, and hence more prone to knock. A bit lengthy but I hope someone will find it useful.

The little green genie in the middle of the steering wheel is the SMC

click to enlarge
Cheers,


Re: 2.4 conversion [Re: DavidL] #1108204
28/09/2010 18:54
28/09/2010 18:54

T
Taz
Unregistered
Taz
Unregistered
T



David, that is very interesting, never heard of such a thing in reality, I may look into this further smile

Does sound very logical.

Re: 2.4 conversion [Re: ] #1108216
28/09/2010 19:15
28/09/2010 19:15
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 581
Taiwan
DavidL Offline
Enjoying the ride
DavidL  Offline
Enjoying the ride

Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 581
Taiwan
Originally Posted By: Taz
David, that is very interesting, never heard of such a thing in reality, I may look into this further smile

Does sound very logical.


Hi Taz,

Just realized that our registration date on the forum is only 2 days apart tongue

IMHO, turbocharged engines should be tuned according to boost level in most respects and not according to rpm only (Fiat's idea of controlling the variator cheaply as it does not have a MAP sensor for the boost level). Check out this link for pressure switches: SMC

Because I don't need to worry about knock, so I usually just boot it and use scramble mode for the AVC-R...I've also tested every cylinder for compression and matched it with precise injector dynamic flow range(@ 3.8 bar fuel pressure 80% IDC)
click to enlarge
Cheers,

David


Re: 2.4 conversion [Re: DavidL] #1111275
05/10/2010 06:58
05/10/2010 06:58
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,194
Göteborg, Sweden
Freddan72 Offline
Competition Level
Freddan72  Offline
Competition Level

Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,194
Göteborg, Sweden
Very interesting stuff David. I was very surprised to know that OE chip uses the variator more than GTec and Novitec. Is this because engine with tuning chip hit boost earlier than original engine (with original chip)?

Do you have time to show us how you installed it with all wires etc?

Maybe you have a nice wiring scheme next to you. smile


Coupé Fiat 20V Turbo Plus 1999, T19 Mitsubishi turbo
https://youtu.be/O9qrLj3Ap00 Now FCP Stage3!
Re: 2.4 conversion [Re: Freddan72] #1112958
08/10/2010 08:10
08/10/2010 08:10
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 581
Taiwan
DavidL Offline
Enjoying the ride
DavidL  Offline
Enjoying the ride

Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 581
Taiwan
Originally Posted By: Freddan72
Very interesting stuff David. I was very surprised to know that OE chip uses the variator more than GTec and Novitec. Is this because engine with tuning chip hit boost earlier than original engine (with original chip)?

Do you have time to show us how you installed it with all wires etc?

Maybe you have a nice wiring scheme next to you. smile


Hi,

I'll try to draw up a relay to illustrate how it's done later as I'll be traveling next week. The OE and novitec altered the rev in which the variator is shut off...merely to demonstrate that they can...rather than for tuning reasons. A bigger turbo might be laggier, so I would imagine that the vatiator should be shut off at the same rev if not later. But this depends on how the car is tuned in other respects. I'm running a GT2864RS and I start boosting at 1500 rpm and reaches 1 Bar around 3000 rpm, once the variator is shut off, it goes all the way to 1.8(peak) and then maintained at 1.7 or 1.6 depending on which button you press tongue

Cheers,

David


Re: 2.4 conversion [Re: DavidL] #1112988
08/10/2010 09:45
08/10/2010 09:45
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,194
Göteborg, Sweden
Freddan72 Offline
Competition Level
Freddan72  Offline
Competition Level

Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,194
Göteborg, Sweden
Originally Posted By: DavidL
Originally Posted By: Freddan72
Very interesting stuff David. I was very surprised to know that OE chip uses the variator more than GTec and Novitec. Is this because engine with tuning chip hit boost earlier than original engine (with original chip)?

Do you have time to show us how you installed it with all wires etc?

Maybe you have a nice wiring scheme next to you. smile


Hi,

I'll try to draw up a relay to illustrate how it's done later as I'll be traveling next week. The OE and novitec altered the rev in which the variator is shut off...merely to demonstrate that they can...rather than for tuning reasons. A bigger turbo might be laggier, so I would imagine that the vatiator should be shut off at the same rev if not later. But this depends on how the car is tuned in other respects. I'm running a GT2864RS and I start boosting at 1500 rpm and reaches 1 Bar around 3000 rpm, once the variator is shut off, it goes all the way to 1.8(peak) and then maintained at 1.7 or 1.6 depending on which button you press tongue

Cheers,

David

Which gear did you use?

I'm looking forward to see your illustration smile


Coupé Fiat 20V Turbo Plus 1999, T19 Mitsubishi turbo
https://youtu.be/O9qrLj3Ap00 Now FCP Stage3!
Re: 2.4 conversion [Re: Freddan72] #1113138
08/10/2010 15:47
08/10/2010 15:47

N
nyssa7
Unregistered
nyssa7
Unregistered
N



I would be interested to see how this works, on a race car I don't care about lumpy idle and stuff, and the mapping can clean it up anyway, but I do need the torque to come in as low as we can manage and with as little lag

Was thinking of just disabling the variator in its high revs position

Re: 2.4 conversion [Re: ] #1113143
08/10/2010 15:53
08/10/2010 15:53
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,034
Sweden
Per Offline
I need some sleep
Per  Offline
I need some sleep

Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,034
Sweden
Surely you use the variator to get torque just like Fiat did? I find it hard to see how you could benefit from taking it off..?

Re: 2.4 conversion [Re: DavidL] #1123383
30/10/2010 19:12
30/10/2010 19:12
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,194
Göteborg, Sweden
Freddan72 Offline
Competition Level
Freddan72  Offline
Competition Level

Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,194
Göteborg, Sweden
David any news for us?


Coupé Fiat 20V Turbo Plus 1999, T19 Mitsubishi turbo
https://youtu.be/O9qrLj3Ap00 Now FCP Stage3!
Re: 2.4 conversion [Re: Freddan72] #1143873
14/12/2010 02:55
14/12/2010 02:55
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 581
Taiwan
DavidL Offline
Enjoying the ride
DavidL  Offline
Enjoying the ride

Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 581
Taiwan
Originally Posted By: Freddan72
Very interesting stuff David. I was very surprised to know that OE chip uses the variator more than GTec and Novitec. Is this because engine with tuning chip hit boost earlier than original engine (with original chip)?

Do you have time to show us how you installed it with all wires etc?

Maybe you have a nice wiring scheme next to you. smile


Sorry, I've been traveling for the past couple of months. The reason the oe chip uses the variator more, is due to the fact that the conservative ignition map allows the engine to be more knock tolerant. With Novitec and G-tec as the ignition map have been more aggressive (more advanced), hence the engine is more prone to develop knock, hence, the timing variator must be shut off earlier to prevent this.

In brief, it's just like the reverse of the fuel pump relay mode. First, we need to locate the relay with the metal casing on the passenger side (left) or the suspension upper mount.

click to enlarge

Then we need to know which pin out stands for, by referring to the repair manual. From the ecu pin out, you can see that #52 controls the variator. When you blip the throttle and when the water temp is above 40 degrees, the ecu will send out a signal to the variator relay to turn it on.
click to enlarge

Referring to the detailed schematic, we can see that #27 is the solenoid of the variator, #22 being the relay for it.
click to enlarge

Referring to the above schematic, we can see the for #22(normally closed relay), there are 4 pins, namely, 30(battery terminal(+)), 86(ground), 87b(signal to the variator solenoid), 85(connects to the signal from the ecu pin#52). Now, we know that once the car is warmed up, the variator comes on whenever the throttle is pressed (below 4800 rpm). And all that we need is to be able to turn it off prematurely, so we don't need to temper with the pin 85 that's connected to the ecu #52pin. We need to modify pin 87b so that it goes through another relay before entering the solenoid. The additional relay used is one that is normally closes(#30 to #87) and when signals are given, it is opened (so that the circuit for the solenoid is broken).By doing so, we can use the SMC or any pressure switch to turn off the variator at any given pressure that we desire.

click to enlarge

I hope I've not complicated a simple job tongue
The easier way would be to use a Hobbs switch rather than a pressure switch, but then you will need to know the working pressure range with each turn.

Cheers,

David


Re: 2.4 conversion [Re: DavidL] #1143895
14/12/2010 09:30
14/12/2010 09:30
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,194
Göteborg, Sweden
Freddan72 Offline
Competition Level
Freddan72  Offline
Competition Level

Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,194
Göteborg, Sweden
Thanks David smile


Coupé Fiat 20V Turbo Plus 1999, T19 Mitsubishi turbo
https://youtu.be/O9qrLj3Ap00 Now FCP Stage3!
Re: 2.4 conversion [Re: Freddan72] #1145259
16/12/2010 22:39
16/12/2010 22:39

N
napraznicu
Unregistered
napraznicu
Unregistered
N



Thank you very much David wink !

Re: 2.4 conversion [Re: DavidL] #1145375
17/12/2010 09:33
17/12/2010 09:33

N
nyssa7
Unregistered
nyssa7
Unregistered
N



Forgive me if this sounds like a stupid question - I did think the variator was opened by oil pressure without really thinking about how

For those of us running non-Fiat ECUs, does this mean the variator doesn't get opened?

Re: 2.4 conversion [Re: DavidL] #1145379
17/12/2010 09:38
17/12/2010 09:38

N
nyssa7
Unregistered
nyssa7
Unregistered
N



Originally Posted By: DavidL
Hi Taz,

Just realized that our registration date on the forum is only 2 days apart tongue

Cheers,

David


Most of us long term forum users will have registration dates close together because the old forum was lost back in 2005 and we all had to re-register

Re: 2.4 conversion [Re: ] #1145421
17/12/2010 10:48
17/12/2010 10:48
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 286
Germany
Stichl Offline
Making a profit
Stichl  Offline
Making a profit

Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 286
Germany
Hi,

yes - you have to use a separate channel of your motec to get it functional.
I used my "boost - output" of my KMS, because you will need a channel which switches on over idle and switches off at higher revs again (means two different switch - points)...
else you will loose cylinder filling / some torque in medium revs...
Juergen

Originally Posted By: nyssa7
Forgive me if this sounds like a stupid question - I did think the variator was opened by oil pressure without really thinking about how

For those of us running non-Fiat ECUs, does this mean the variator doesn't get opened?


20VT coupegrale 4x4
Re: 2.4 conversion [Re: LiamM] #1175795
23/02/2011 19:30
23/02/2011 19:30

N
napraznicu
Unregistered
napraznicu
Unregistered
N



DavidL -your inbox is full..:(
Stichl and DavidL , I need base info about 2.4 conversion. I have to order conrods but i don't know exactly height/all dimensions frown. I took a stilo 2.4 service/repair manual and is.. beautiful (e-learn) but Absolutely USELESS frown
Cheers,

Re: 2.4 conversion [Re: ] #1439387
25/07/2013 07:33
25/07/2013 07:33
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 581
Taiwan
DavidL Offline
Enjoying the ride
DavidL  Offline
Enjoying the ride

Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 581
Taiwan
Originally Posted By: nyssa7
Forgive me if this sounds like a stupid question - I did think the variator was opened by oil pressure without really thinking about how

For those of us running non-Fiat ECUs, does this mean the variator doesn't get opened?


Sorry, been traveling again, just to revive the old thread. The variator is opened by solenoid that sits between the #1 and #2 plenum, which in turn lets the oil pressure push the intake camshaft forward (in respect to value timing). So in a sense, you're also right.



Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.1
(Release build 20190129)
PHP: 7.3.33 Page Time: 0.018s Queries: 15 (0.007s) Memory: 0.8530 MB (Peak: 1.0405 MB) Data Comp: Off Server Time: 2024-05-15 11:32:09 UTC