|
|
|
0 registered members (),
1,050
guests, and 1
spider. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Forums48
Topics103,724
Posts1,170,148
Members1,666
| |
Most Online39,516 Apr 16th, 2026
|
|
|
Re: Eibach vs. Novitec on Bilsteins?
[Re: Rask]
#1145235
16/12/2010 21:27
16/12/2010 21:27
|
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 864 North-East
zak
Enjoying the ride
|
Enjoying the ride
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 864
North-East
|
I was under the impression that Novitec springs are rebranded Eibachs, but don't take my word for it as I'm not 100% sure.
picture too large; max size allowed is 300 x 100 pixels, please resize 2000X 20VT+
|
|
|
Re: Eibach vs. Novitec on Bilsteins?
[Re: zak]
#1145714
17/12/2010 22:40
17/12/2010 22:40
|
Taz
Unregistered
|
Taz
Unregistered
|
most of Novitec stuff is Eibach, albeit the quality ( for some odd reason is not as robust ! ). ARBs are ok, but the old pair of rear novitec springs I had just crumbled with rust !! Eibach all day I'm fraid
|
|
|
Re: Eibach vs. Novitec on Bilsteins?
[Re: ]
#1145847
18/12/2010 13:07
18/12/2010 13:07
|
Per
Unregistered
|
Per
Unregistered
|
Novitec were 40mm, Eibach were 30mm so I don't think they are the same.
Remember Novitec are a bit on the serious side, they tend to develop stuff on their own (they did make the first ever usable aftermarket chip for 20VT, etc etc)
Anyhow, 40mm lowering instead of 30mm will probably mean less comfort. There's also a risk of being further from the Bilstein "normal" damping range.
All springs rust aswell, my Eibach's too.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|