Fiat Coupe Forum
- Funded by the Club for the benefit of all owners
- Please consider joining the Club to help keep the Forum running
- Or you can choose to make a Donation
Fiat Coupe Club UK
join the club
Fiat Coupe Forum
 
» Announced
    Posting images


» Related sites
    Main club site
    fiatcoupe.net

 
Who's Online Now
3 registered members (DaveG, LE83, 1 invisible), 1,877 guests, and 8 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums48
Topics103,733
Posts1,170,232
Members1,669
Most Online39,516
Apr 16th, 2026
Top Posters(All Time)
barnacle 33,794
stan 32,123
Theresa 23,348
PeteP 22,313
bockers 21,083
Edinburgh 18,945
JimO 17,919
Nigel 17,387
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 2 of 2 1 2
Re: Less boost = more power? [Re: Rudidudi] #1162562
27/01/2011 14:02
27/01/2011 14:02

S
suba
Unregistered
suba
Unregistered
S



Originally Posted by Rudidudi
Originally Posted by suba
Put it this way - on the stock turbo I tried upping the boost to 1.4 bar on the dyno, and got no more out of it than at 1.2 bar...... this was through a front mount IC as well.


if the restriction was airflow then you would have found that whilst maximum power may not have increased the torque continued to be delivered lower in the rev range. having huge quantities of torque available at low revs is always beneficial. infact id argue that in non race applications torque at low revs is more valuable than high bhp at top end of the revs.

its all about what is available under the curve, not the peak figure smile


True - but a brief overboost spike on an FWD car just makes you loose traction most of the time, and you are pushing the turbo past it's efficiency - making it very likely to fail.

Re: Less boost = more power? [Re: ] #1162579
27/01/2011 14:35
27/01/2011 14:35

N
Nievelc
Unregistered
Nievelc
Unregistered
N



Is that a regular temp sensor like the water temp sensor?

Tim

Re: Less boost = more power? [Re: ] #1162581
27/01/2011 14:46
27/01/2011 14:46

N
Nievelc
Unregistered
Nievelc
Unregistered
N



Cannot seem to find a specific gauge that measure charge temps. Probably a waste of time unless it's hooked up to a laptop and logged in conjunction with time and RPM

Re: Less boost = more power? [Re: ] #1162584
27/01/2011 14:57
27/01/2011 14:57

G
GS_Racing
Unregistered
GS_Racing
Unregistered
G



no,you will need a charge air temp gauge with a sensor capableof reading temp in the boost pipes without being thrown off by the flow.
i have this one fitted in mine (rarely sees over 35 degrees c but then i run twin intercoolers!)
http://www.methanol-injection.co.uk/images/tn4_2164447.jpg
but there are also other gauges
http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/Air-Charge-Te...M&hash=item4cf4309f70#ht_2640wt_1139

http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/PLX-DM5-Air-I...M&hash=item1c15ae6963#ht_4126wt_1241

Re: Less boost = more power? [Re: ] #1162586
27/01/2011 15:02
27/01/2011 15:02

N
Nievelc
Unregistered
Nievelc
Unregistered
N



Legend Cheers GS


Re: Less boost = more power? [Re: ] #1162661
27/01/2011 18:03
27/01/2011 18:03

T
tricky
Unregistered
tricky
Unregistered
T



Do you have any pictures of your I/C setup ?

Last edited by tricky; 27/01/2011 18:04.
Re: Less boost = more power? [Re: ] #1162694
27/01/2011 19:00
27/01/2011 19:00

G
GS_Racing
Unregistered
GS_Racing
Unregistered
G



no,but its fairly easy to describe,front mount alloy intercooler behind the bumper then another intercooler running vertically (from front view,its about 30 degrees from vertical from the side as its leaning toward the rear of the car to get the pipe work to the throttlebody) in front of the wheel arch on the passenger side,same kind of routing as a normal front mount i think,but i saw enough space to fit a second cooler,and went for it,that 35 degree reading was on a hot day,1.5 bar,WOT through 3rd,4th and into 5th gear.very effective.

Last edited by GS_Racing; 27/01/2011 19:02.
Re: Less boost = more power? [Re: ] #1162833
27/01/2011 23:56
27/01/2011 23:56

T
tricky
Unregistered
tricky
Unregistered
T



Were you not concered about / have you measured pressure loss through them ?

Obviously it cools the charge very well, but I was just curious.

Re: Less boost = more power? [Re: ] #1162997
28/01/2011 12:39
28/01/2011 12:39

G
GS_Racing
Unregistered
GS_Racing
Unregistered
G



pressure loss is much less important to me than cooling,i did have a quick check,plumbing my boost gauge to either side and saw no problems,the car runs faster with no noticeable change in lag

Last edited by GS_Racing; 28/01/2011 12:40. Reason: spelling
Re: Less boost = more power? [Re: ] #1163085
28/01/2011 14:57
28/01/2011 14:57

A
ally_f
Unregistered
ally_f
Unregistered
A



[quote=MattW
I'm using a simple ball and spring PRV, no placebo effect here, I measured it on the boost gauge.
[/quote]

I had the same issue with boost peaking and dropping off very quickly with the original (faulty) controller and a PRV; swapped it for a Gizzmo electronic controller and now it holds the boost much much longer. On the rollers at Weston Performance it took it from 219BHP (with Gtec1, so not good) up to 250.

Re: Less boost = more power? [Re: ] #1163143
28/01/2011 16:43
28/01/2011 16:43

N
Nievelc
Unregistered
Nievelc
Unregistered
N



GS - Your setup is quite interesting makes me think is there a benefit to having 2 smaller intercoolers instead of 1 big one? Do you per chance have a RR?

Re: Less boost = more power? [Re: ] #1163167
28/01/2011 17:18
28/01/2011 17:18

G
GS_Racing
Unregistered
GS_Racing
Unregistered
G



no,there is one within 5 minutes drive of my house though.my tuning philosophy is usually one of,if i have stuff lying around ill try to use that instead of buying more stuff and wasting money,so i used what i had,tested it,it worked,so it aint broke lol.
i have the same setup as this car,and if it works for them itll work for me!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jPLbMWxjo7Y

900bhp mk4 golf,at 4.33 you can see the 2 intercoolers as per mine in exactly the same configuration

Page 2 of 2 1 2

Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.1
(Release build 20190129)
PHP: 7.4.33 Page Time: 0.027s Queries: 15 (0.020s) Memory: 0.6346 MB (Peak: 0.7554 MB) Data Comp: Off Server Time: 2026-10-23 07:29:38 UTC