0 registered members (),
215
guests, and 3
spiders. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums69
Topics113,637
Posts1,341,412
Members1,814
|
Most Online731 Jan 14th, 2020
|
|
|
Re: Linguistically challenged question
[Re: sugerbear]
#1335411
17/04/2012 10:20
17/04/2012 10:20
|
h2ypr
Unregistered
|
h2ypr
Unregistered
|
Is this a Latin phrase?
Ross
|
|
|
Re: Linguistically challenged question
[Re: sugerbear]
#1335417
17/04/2012 10:39
17/04/2012 10:39
|
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 12,546 Northumberland
AndrewR
I AM a Coop
|
I AM a Coop
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 12,546
Northumberland
|
As a general rule Latin doesn't have silent letters and is pretty much phonetic.
So, Cav-ee-at
Dear monos, a secret truth.
|
|
|
Re: Linguistically challenged question
[Re: sugerbear]
#1335418
17/04/2012 10:39
17/04/2012 10:39
|
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 6,144 Southampton, Hants
Roadking
Club member 1809
|
Club member 1809
Forum is my life
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 6,144
Southampton, Hants
|
No idea how it should be pronounced, but that's the one I use, and frankly the only one I've heard.. Andrew's spelling is a closer approximation of how I'd say it.
Last edited by Roadking; 17/04/2012 10:40. Reason: Saw AR's post
"RK's way seems the most sensible to me". ali_hire 16 Dec 2010
|
|
|
Re: Linguistically challenged question
[Re: sugerbear]
#1335421
17/04/2012 10:57
17/04/2012 10:57
|
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 6,731 Surrey
Emjay
Forum is my life
|
Forum is my life
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 6,731
Surrey
|
Although we're on track now with caveat, seeing as I've been granted permission to be a pedant, it's "emptor"
Does our law condemn a man without first hearing him to find out what he has been doing? (John 7:51)
|
|
|
Re: Linguistically challenged question
[Re: ]
#1335469
17/04/2012 13:52
17/04/2012 13:52
|
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 12,546 Northumberland
AndrewR
I AM a Coop
|
I AM a Coop
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 12,546
Northumberland
|
Sorry, Ross, nobody answered you. Yes, it's Latin and normally seen in the phrase Caveat Emptor - let the buyer beware. For example, you could say that when buying a used car from a private seller the rule of caveat emptor applies - in that it's the buyer's responsibility to ensure that the car is working and suitable. Unless the seller has deliberately misled the buyer then the sale is final and the buyer can't hold the seller responsible if the engine blows up and all the wheels drop off at the end of the seller's driveway.
Dear monos, a secret truth.
|
|
|
Re: Linguistically challenged question
[Re: AndrewR]
#1335570
17/04/2012 19:18
17/04/2012 19:18
|
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 16,847 Auld Reekie
Edinburgh
Club President, member225
|
Club President, member225
Forum veteran
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 16,847
Auld Reekie
|
The phrase also shows Latin's great economy of words. The subjunctive tense [or the spelling at the end of Caveat ] implies the meaning of allowance, as Andrew says "Let". Also no definite article required. The important word in a Latin phrase is denoted by its position in the sentence, usually strongest at the very end, even being plucked out of the middle. On occasions it's dragged k and s to the very front of the sentence where it is designed to act like an uppercut Here the emphasis in only two words could be construed as being fairly evenly weighted. WAKE UP!!!!!!!!!!
Last edited by Edinburgh; 17/04/2012 19:18. Reason: Hard work being that pedantic
BumbleBee carer
|
|
|
|