0 registered members (),
134
guests, and 2
spiders. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums70
Topics113,758
Posts1,340,615
Members1,700
|
Most Online2,346 Apr 14th, 2025
|
|
|
Ball bearing VS Journal bearing?
#1397447
11/12/2012 16:22
11/12/2012 16:22
|
Turboman87
Unregistered
|
Turboman87
Unregistered
|
I would like to know a bit more about the pro's and con's for BB versus journal bearing turbo's??
And maybe people want to share their experience/oppinion after installing a new/rebuild turbo, journal or ball bearing. What type off turbo and what sort off improvement it gave?
Now I have run the engine in after rebuild and changed the oil etc. I gave it some boost a few times.
Now with the stage 3 kit (BB T34 50trim/ stage 2 0.63 hotside) from Dink. The engine's character is more like a 20VT.
Now the turbo is starting to make some boost below 2000 rpm. And when you floor it a bit you have full boost in the blink off an eye. Really impressive I think, if you compare to the standard unit. And exactly what I wanted. I was scared that it would become to laggy. But it's the opposite.
Best Regards Michael
|
|
|
Re: Ball bearing VS Journal bearing?
[Re: ]
#1397453
11/12/2012 16:53
11/12/2012 16:53
|
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,728 London
kj16v
My life on the forum
|
My life on the forum
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,728
London
|
Well you've experienced the pros right there  : Lower boost threshold and less lag. Also able to handle greater thrust loading - Garrett's duall BB can supposedly handle up to 10x more than a journal bearing CHRA. Turbonetics old hybrid roller bearing CHRA can supposedly take 50x more, IIRC. Cons: Considerably more expensive to buy compared to the same turbo with journal bearing CHRA. Also completely impossible to rebuild; the only way to "rebuild" a BB turbo is to unbolt the old CHRA, buy a brand new one and bolt it in.
|
|
|
Re: Ball bearing VS Journal bearing?
[Re: ]
#1397462
11/12/2012 17:18
11/12/2012 17:18
|
Per
Unregistered
|
Per
Unregistered
|
I have a BB Garrett GT28R with some flow mods (manifold+turbine inlet) and Flea mapping. i get full boost at the same revs as std Coupe and positive boost (over 0bar) just over tick-over, ca 1100rpm! 
|
|
|
Re: Ball bearing VS Journal bearing?
[Re: ]
#1397469
11/12/2012 17:36
11/12/2012 17:36
|
Turboman87
Unregistered
|
Turboman87
Unregistered
|
Ok so that is why they sell a BB CHRA. And you can keep using your old housings. BB costs more money, but lives longer too.
Very impressive Per. Spool up like standard but bhp not so standard I think. I like that too.
|
|
|
Re: Ball bearing VS Journal bearing?
[Re: ]
#1397477
11/12/2012 18:21
11/12/2012 18:21
|
RICHB
Unregistered
|
RICHB
Unregistered
|
So how much more expensive are they ? They are more efficient, robust, faster spooling and more durable...sounds like a no brainer...dependent on price! 
|
|
|
Re: Ball bearing VS Journal bearing?
[Re: ]
#1397515
11/12/2012 22:07
11/12/2012 22:07
|
group5lancia
Unregistered
|
group5lancia
Unregistered
|
Well, apparently they are not more durable under all circumstances.
Advice from Turbo Technics to me was: if you suddenly stop the engine after running at high turbo temperature, or for whatever reason can't allow the turbo to cool down progressively for a relatively long time from max heat, the bearing cage will melt or at least distort due to heat soak. Unless you have non-plastic bearing cages e.g. ceramic (do they do metal ones to?) which adds still further expensive.
I guess with most road cars this won't be an issue, but if you drag or do track days etc.....
Last edited by group5lancia; 11/12/2012 22:09.
|
|
|
Re: Ball bearing VS Journal bearing?
[Re: ]
#1397645
12/12/2012 18:00
12/12/2012 18:00
|
Turboman87
Unregistered
|
Turboman87
Unregistered
|
Well, apparently they are not more durable under all circumstances.
Advice from Turbo Technics to me was: if you suddenly stop the engine after running at high turbo temperature, or for whatever reason can't allow the turbo to cool down progressively for a relatively long time from max heat, the bearing cage will melt or at least distort due to heat soak. Unless you have non-plastic bearing cages e.g. ceramic (do they do metal ones to?) which adds still further expensive.
I guess with most road cars this won't be an issue, but if you drag or do track days etc..... Your wright, but that is also for a journall bearing. Maybe it won't fail as quick as a BB. But in the end if you turn the engine off after hard driving every turbo will fail. My old original turbo had done 80.000 miles and it still has miles on it. A little play on the shaft but it performed well and didn't smoke even with decat for the last 25000 miles. When I drive it fast, I always drive the last 5 miles slow to cool everything down. And when I get home I let it idle for a little minute. So no barbeque for my Coupe.
|
|
|
Re: Ball bearing VS Journal bearing?
[Re: ]
#1397652
12/12/2012 18:38
12/12/2012 18:38
|
group5lancia
Unregistered
|
group5lancia
Unregistered
|
Well, apparently they are not more durable under all circumstances.
Advice from Turbo Technics to me was: if you suddenly stop the engine after running at high turbo temperature, or for whatever reason can't allow the turbo to cool down progressively for a relatively long time from max heat, the bearing cage will melt or at least distort due to heat soak. Unless you have non-plastic bearing cages e.g. ceramic (do they do metal ones to?) which adds still further expensive.
I guess with most road cars this won't be an issue, but if you drag or do track days etc..... Your wright, but that is also for a journall bearing. Maybe it won't fail as quick as a BB. But in the end if you turn the engine off after hard driving every turbo will fail. My old original turbo had done 80.000 miles and it still has miles on it. A little play on the shaft but it performed well and didn't smoke even with decat for the last 25000 miles. When I drive it fast, I always drive the last 5 miles slow to cool everything down. And when I get home I let it idle for a little minute. So no barbeque for my Coupe. A journal bearing turbo won't fail immediately and beyond repair if the engine is stopped without cooling the turbo, as a BB turbo can. The only damage will be to the oil - not the bearings. If not dealt, with the 'coked' oil in/around the bearings could cause a problem later on. But that can be prevented by simple dismantling and cleaning before the turbo is used again. So, unlike with a BB turbo the CHRA does not become instant junk.
Last edited by group5lancia; 12/12/2012 18:38.
|
|
|
Re: Ball bearing VS Journal bearing?
[Re: nick_d]
#1397708
12/12/2012 22:56
12/12/2012 22:56
|
Turboman87
Unregistered
|
Turboman87
Unregistered
|
When you on the dyno Turboman?  Nick That will be end off next year. After my garage has installed new camshafts and timing gear. Then I want the last remap etc. and that includes a RR session. But I'm quite broke now so..... After the rebuild the garage checked the AFR. And did a full diagnostic off the ECU. Also I have an AEM wideband sensor. And everything looks good. They don't risk a rebuild engine. I have guarantee hehe That garage who does the work for me are friends from Dink. They have a Delta HPE two wheel drive for racing etc. Haven't got any problems with the car after rebuild etc. not even a small oil leak or stuff like that. I'm really impressed with their work.
Last edited by Turboman87; 13/12/2012 02:34.
|
|
|
Re: Ball bearing VS Journal bearing?
[Re: nick_d]
#1397726
13/12/2012 00:04
13/12/2012 00:04
|
doug20vt
Unregistered
|
doug20vt
Unregistered
|
to give you some idea of the differences in very similar size turbo's, 1 ball bearing and 1 journal bearing on a 20vt turbo
i went from a journal bearing hybrid turbo 60trim 60mm compressor wheel to a ball bearing 62trim 60mm compressor wheel (both with standard 0.49a/r turbine housing size and standard turbine wheels) so the difference in turbo size was quite small
the ball bearing version spooled about 200rpm earlier in the rev range despite being slightly bigger (not overly impressive but it's still a relatively small turbo, the gains will be greater on a bigger turbo) but the biggest difference was in response once over the engine speed at which the turbo is fully spooled (about 3000rpm), the response from the ball bearing felt much quicker and jumped to full boost noticeably quicker than the journal bearing turbo
as has been said though they are considerably more expensive and if they fail you can't rebuild them
hope the above is of some use
|
|
|
Re: Ball bearing VS Journal bearing?
[Re: ]
#1397729
13/12/2012 00:19
13/12/2012 00:19
|
Turboman87
Unregistered
|
Turboman87
Unregistered
|
I have stage 3 kit from Dink, that includes a chip and 500cc injectors from Bosch. Full boost is 1.2 bar to redline.
I only drove 250miles after run in period and oil change and I want to be gentle on the engine. It has done around 1000miles in total now.
So I only did a few small tests. One was load the turbo in 4th gear from 1500rpm and then I had 0.3-0.4bar at 2000rpm and I lift the trottle. So I imagine that full boost will be around 2500rpm?! And today full trottle in 2th gear to redline. Was quite fast so I only had the chance to look at AFR a little. And try to keep it on the road.
I do a good test on motorway after it has done some more miles.
|
|
|
Re: Ball bearing VS Journal bearing?
[Re: ]
#1397730
13/12/2012 00:25
13/12/2012 00:25
|
Turboman87
Unregistered
|
Turboman87
Unregistered
|
to give you some idea of the differences in very similar size turbo's, 1 ball bearing and 1 journal bearing on a 20vt turbo
i went from a journal bearing hybrid turbo 60trim 60mm compressor wheel to a ball bearing 62trim 60mm compressor wheel (both with standard 0.49a/r turbine housing size and standard turbine wheels) so the difference in turbo size was quite small
the ball bearing version spooled about 200rpm earlier in the rev range despite being slightly bigger (not overly impressive but it's still a relatively small turbo, the gains will be greater on a bigger turbo) but the biggest difference was in response once over the engine speed at which the turbo is fully spooled (about 3000rpm), the response from the ball bearing felt much quicker and jumped to full boost noticeably quicker than the journal bearing turbo
as has been said though they are considerably more expensive and if they fail you can't rebuild them
hope the above is of some use Very interesting. This is what I was asking for. To compare the same unit but different bearing. Or what max performance people make on what sort off turbo.
|
|
|
Re: Ball bearing VS Journal bearing?
[Re: ]
#1397927
13/12/2012 21:09
13/12/2012 21:09
|
Turboman87
Unregistered
|
Turboman87
Unregistered
|
It is definatly a stage 2 0.63 A/R hotside. And the compressor is a TO4E 50 trim (76mm-54mm) and 0.50A/R with double BB. I think the serial number was TB0385 but not sure on that. But the A/R I'm very sure because it's stamped in the housings. And everything off the turbo was definatly brand new.
I had all those parts laying around for a year. Had it a lot in my hands to see the spec. Even measured the compressor wheel, it was 54mm from memory. The hose for turbo inlet was 57mm inner diameter.
I will give it some beans tomorrow if its dry....
Last edited by Turboman87; 13/12/2012 21:17.
|
|
|
Re: Ball bearing VS Journal bearing?
[Re: ]
#1397934
13/12/2012 21:57
13/12/2012 21:57
|
Turboman87
Unregistered
|
Turboman87
Unregistered
|
No, I have a original head, intake and exhaust manifold. And original ECU. And want to keep it like that.
Only new camshafts from C&B max fast road and live mapping for next year. And then going for an Accusump system and brake, handling parts and stuff like that.
This project has cost me more than enough. And because the rebuild is already done, I'm not planning on opening the engine again and porting or polishing anything. Because if I would it has to be done by GC.
|
|
|
Re: Ball bearing VS Journal bearing?
[Re: ]
#1397938
13/12/2012 22:19
13/12/2012 22:19
|
Turboman87
Unregistered
|
Turboman87
Unregistered
|
So the specs for now are: rebuild head (re-cut and cleaned valves and seatings, new valve stem seals etc) Rebuild bottom end: wossner pistons ZRP forged rods ARP2000 bolts Fully balanced and lightened bottom end All new bearings crank and big ends ARP headbolts Spesso 66212 1.9mm headgasket 3 inch downpipe (Dink) 2.25 inch decat to rear SIP (75mm) with Green pod filter FMIC and had to chop half the bumper off so 3bar FPR with 500cc bosch injectors (red) Garrett BB TO4E 50 trim 0.50 A/R with 0.63 stage 2 hotside Stage 3 map from Dink front new wishbones track rod ends etc etc. Upgrade fast road clutch (original flywheel) AEM wideband and boost gauge EBV from Dink New Forge DMV004 Walbro 255L per hour fuell pump New coils and spark plug leads New RVS fuell lines and filter at the rear New alu radiator and waterpump Balance belt removed etc. and 22mm cambelt kit AGIP fully synthetic oil 10W60
Last edited by Turboman87; 13/12/2012 22:38.
|
|
|
Re: Ball bearing VS Journal bearing?
[Re: nick_d]
#1397943
13/12/2012 23:13
13/12/2012 23:13
|
Turboman87
Unregistered
|
Turboman87
Unregistered
|
Do you know what power level you were at before latest mods? If so how does the new set up compare?? Think you will have to run some SERIOUS boost then to get near 400 bhp, I know your not interested in max power figures but I still reckon you'll need to run 1.8 bar to get near 375 bhp with no head work... I run the max fast road cams and they seem to help power climb right to redline, yours may reach peak power right at the top end as your boost will hold better than mine. With your early spool you should have a great power band and with those cams it will make for a fantastic FAST ROAD car!!
Nick I just want to max out performance a bit more. So want to run max 1.6 bar. And then we will see what figures it can make. I want usable power and fast road car. But I know it pulls a lot harder now already with 1.2 bar so 1.6 is more then enough for me. For example it feels like second gear is now first gear. Or first with stage 1 set up I shift exactly at 6000rpm so when I gave it some beans last time with new set up I shift at 4800rpm because it pulled as fast/hard as 6000rpm on the stage 1 set up. Or with stage 1 set up I could always floor it when I wanted on normal dry roads, but now is impossible to do without wheelspin, torque steer, or a crash.
|
|
|
Re: Ball bearing VS Journal bearing?
[Re: ]
#1397975
14/12/2012 02:08
14/12/2012 02:08
|
group5lancia
Unregistered
|
group5lancia
Unregistered
|
A T04E 50 trim compressor will flow 47lbs/616CFM - which is at least 460BHP and upto 504BHP depending on intercooling.
max p1/p2 is 3.4 max efficiency is 74%.
It's a great compressor wheel (for it's age).... peak boost is higher than any other T04E compressor wheel can manage.
On a 2 litre engine:
full boost at 4500 RPM (not before, but 1.2 bar will come earlier, of course)
and
MAX flow at 7750 RPM before flow/boost will tail off.
Should see some boost from 1500 RPM.
Last edited by group5lancia; 14/12/2012 02:34.
|
|
|
Re: Ball bearing VS Journal bearing?
[Re: nick_d]
#1397976
14/12/2012 02:15
14/12/2012 02:15
|
group5lancia
Unregistered
|
group5lancia
Unregistered
|
TB0385 compressor wheel is 52.2mm inducer and 68.96mm exducer - 57 trim.
It will flow 42lbs/550CFM, so about 400-420BHP tops.
max p1/p2 3.1 max efficiency 71%
Full boost at around 4000 RPM and will run out of puff around 7000 RPM on a 2 litre engine.
It doesn't matter how good a head is if the turbo can't flow enough air!
And bye the way, I got 387BHP @1.7 bar on an 8 valve head with this turbo... engine dyno, not rolling road.
Last edited by group5lancia; 14/12/2012 02:31.
|
|
|
Re: Ball bearing VS Journal bearing?
[Re: ]
#1397979
14/12/2012 06:20
14/12/2012 06:20
|
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,829 kidderminster
nick_d
My life on the forum
|
My life on the forum
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,829
kidderminster
|
I 'Think' that the tb 0385 compressor is what I'm running..... My figures sound about right @ 1.55 bar! I believe 'Saint' was using the same turbo (journal bearing though) as Turboman a while back with 'min' fast road c&b's.... And I tweaked version of my flea map at the time. His turbo was stage 2 turbine but still .48 ex housing... Iirc boost peaked at 1.45 and held 1.4 all the way....... Results were around 300 of both bhp and torques!
Nick
Last edited by nick_d; 14/12/2012 06:32.
368bhp @ 1.5 bar
|
|
|
Re: Ball bearing VS Journal bearing?
[Re: nick_d]
#1398063
14/12/2012 15:31
14/12/2012 15:31
|
group5lancia
Unregistered
|
group5lancia
Unregistered
|
I 'Think' that the tb 0385 compressor is what I'm running..... My figures sound about right @ 1.55 bar! I believe 'Saint' was using the same turbo (journal bearing though) as Turboman a while back with 'min' fast road c&b's.... And I tweaked version of my flea map at the time. His turbo was stage 2 turbine but still .48 ex housing... Iirc boost peaked at 1.45 and held 1.4 all the way....... Results were around 300 of both bhp and torques!
Nick What are your figures? I couldn't find them easily on here, though I did look.
|
|
|
Re: Ball bearing VS Journal bearing?
[Re: nick_d]
#1398066
14/12/2012 15:40
14/12/2012 15:40
|
group5lancia
Unregistered
|
group5lancia
Unregistered
|
I 'Think' that the tb 0385 compressor is what I'm running..... My figures sound about right @ 1.55 bar! I believe 'Saint' was using the same turbo (journal bearing though) as Turboman a while back with 'min' fast road c&b's.... And I tweaked version of my flea map at the time. His turbo was stage 2 turbine but still .48 ex housing... Iirc boost peaked at 1.45 and held 1.4 all the way....... Results were around 300 of both bhp and torques!
Nick Yes - something wrong there. Peak boost should be much higher. The turbo will flow 35lbs at over 2 bar boost, 38 lbs at 2 bar boost, 41lbs at 1.8 bar boost and 42lbs at 1.6 bar boost, but efficiency has fallen below 60% at that point. Efficiency is down to 65% at 40lbs/1.9 bar boost. Flow maxed out is at 1.4 bar boost, but that is about 42.5lbs/min and only 55% efficiency. So it's best not to exceed about 40lbs/min and 1.9bar boost - and that's about 400BHP.
Last edited by group5lancia; 14/12/2012 15:43.
|
|
|
Re: Ball bearing VS Journal bearing?
[Re: ]
#1398082
14/12/2012 17:10
14/12/2012 17:10
|
Turboman87
Unregistered
|
Turboman87
Unregistered
|
I'm 100% sure I have a BB TO4E 50 trim 0.50 A/R compressor with the stage 2 0.63 A/R turbine. For example the comp. housing is that big it clears the gearbox only with 5mm. So to replace clutch or flywheel the turbo has to come off  So a little update: today I drove my Coupe in full wet haha. So in 4th and 5th gear I have 1bar at 3000rpm and full boost (1.2 bar) at 3250rpm. And in higher gears it starts producing boost below 2000rpm. But in lower gears like 2th or 3th full boost (1.2bar) is a little higher at 3500rpm. But still with this weather, roads and trafic can't do a good test to redline area. But it pulls a lot harder with lower rpm then first. I think I will do a Dyno session begin off next year. A company does happy hour on monday mornings for like 80 euro. So that's a bargain. They have a new 880E series AWD chassis dyno. One off the best Dyno's in The Netherlands but is it good for a Coupe too?? I think so but.... Thanks for info everybody!
Last edited by Turboman87; 14/12/2012 17:14.
|
|
|
|