0 registered members (),
212
guests, and 23
spiders. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums70
Topics113,745
Posts1,340,466
Members1,693
|
Most Online2,346 Apr 14th, 2025
|
|
|
Tyre load rating
#1526972
23/02/2015 13:51
23/02/2015 13:51
|
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 5,408 Essex
Trappy
OP
Forum is my life
|
OP
Forum is my life
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 5,408
Essex
|
I've decided I want Yoko AD08Rs to go on the 17" Pro Race 3 wheels I will be fitting later in the year but just noticed an old thread on here in which Nigel mentioned tyre load ratings. Apparently the Coupé needs 87.
AD08Rs in 215/40/17 are rated at 83 which is ringing alarm bells. Having read through a lot of reviews and tests of this tyre, I'm sold on it. So what do I do? I does come in 205/50/16 but I really want to get some bigger wheels now.
Does the Coupé need 87?
Are there any other tyre sizes that can go on a 17" rim that can be used on a 20vT?
Does the rating matter that much?
F****** b****** thing...
|
|
|
Re: Tyre load rating
[Re: Trappy]
#1526981
23/02/2015 14:41
23/02/2015 14:41
|
GrahamL
Unregistered
|
GrahamL
Unregistered
|
87 is rated to 545KG, 83 to 487KG.
Given the front heavy weight distribution of a 20vt coupe and how that changes under cornering/braking, personally I wouldn't use less than the recommended 87 rated tyre on the front wheels.
|
|
|
Re: Tyre load rating
[Re: Trappy]
#1526994
23/02/2015 16:12
23/02/2015 16:12
|
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 869 Germany
neil_r
Enjoying the ride
|
Enjoying the ride
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 869
Germany
|
When I was looking for my first replacement tyres for the 20V and asked the TüV guys whether a Y-rated tyre, as specified in the little green card we get, was necessary, they went away and checked and said "V" was fine for my "slow" car but maintaining the 86 load rating for the 15" tyres was important. The VT is a bit heavier so may need 87 or the 205/50 16 are typically rated at 87. Either way, you really do need to be in that ball park. 83 is too low.
1997 20V 2000 V6 manual S-Type and 2011 5.0 XKR 2016 Tucson 1.6T AWD 2018 Mazda2 GT
|
|
|
Re: Tyre load rating
[Re: Trappy]
#1527098
24/02/2015 08:04
24/02/2015 08:04
|
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 869 Germany
neil_r
Enjoying the ride
|
Enjoying the ride
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 869
Germany
|
The load rating does not really have much positive to do with handling. It is exactly what it says on the box - a load rating - how much weight the tyre can take at the maximum rated speed of the tyre. Take a higher than necessary load rating and you are buying a tyre that is stronger, which usually means harder and heavier and then the ride and handling may noticably suffer. Bigger tyres usually have a higher load rating because they are primarily designed for bigger, heavier cars. Hence the 89 on the 225 as opposed to the 87 on the 205. A 225 with a load rating of 87 would actually be ideal as long as it has been designed to be that bit lighter!
1997 20V 2000 V6 manual S-Type and 2011 5.0 XKR 2016 Tucson 1.6T AWD 2018 Mazda2 GT
|
|
|
Re: Tyre load rating
[Re: Jimbo]
#1527149
24/02/2015 13:17
24/02/2015 13:17
|
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 17,374 Staffordshire
Nigel
Forum veteran
|
Forum veteran
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 17,374
Staffordshire
|
not sure on the wear rating for your mileage though? irrelevant nowadays - only doing a couple of thousand a year now - Alfa GT is doing all the grunt work EDIT - Michelin Pilot Super Sport not available in the size I need 
|
|
|
Re: Tyre load rating
[Re: Nigel]
#1527159
24/02/2015 14:23
24/02/2015 14:23
|
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 5,408 Essex
Trappy
OP
Forum is my life
|
OP
Forum is my life
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 5,408
Essex
|
Thanks for the feedback everyone PS - Trappy - have a look at the 235/40 17 Toyo R1R - comes in 90W load rating and the size is only a bit up on the 215/40 Nigel, I hadn’t considered that size but I’ve now looked into it a little it looks like a pretty good fit. The Yoko AD08R also comes in this size AND it’s a 90W as well. Would being around 8mm bigger than 205/50/16 and 16mm bigger than 215/40/17 in terms of overall circumference (as well as being wider) cause them to rub? I would imagine that the slightly smaller profile wouldn’t ‘squish’ as much leaving the total rolling radius even higher still… Has anyone tried tyres at this size?
Last edited by Trappy; 24/02/2015 14:39.
F****** b****** thing...
|
|
|
Re: Tyre load rating
[Re: Gunzi]
#1528070
03/03/2015 12:58
03/03/2015 12:58
|
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 5,408 Essex
Trappy
OP
Forum is my life
|
OP
Forum is my life
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 5,408
Essex
|
What about 225/40 17?
ISTR that the AD08 comes in this slightly unusual size I looked it up and but couldn't find any reference to this... I doubt this will help much but the AD08R 225/45/16 is 89W rated. I've considered this, but I need bigger wheels now. Everytime I approach the car they just look too small now  I have narrowed it down to two choices: Pro Race 3 17x7 (8.2kgs) AD08R 215/45/17 87W (23lbs) Pros: Favourite wheel style, same weight as standard, slightly smaller sidewall Cons: Larger than standard rolling radius OR Pro Race 1.2 17x8 (8.9kgs) AD08R 235/40/17 90W (25lbs) Pros: Better load rating, correct rolling radius, slightly smaller sidewall, FAT tyres! Cons: 1kg heavier than standard, washing them... Thoughts?
F****** b****** thing...
|
|
|
|