|
4 registered members (Edinburgh, ikon, respace, 1 invisible),
1,459
guests, and 6
spiders. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Forums48
Topics103,774
Posts1,170,678
Members1,682
| |
Most Online39,516 Apr 15th, 2026
|
|
|
Re: GT28R v GT28RS
#173014
23/08/2006 02:35
23/08/2006 02:35
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Thanks for tihis TurboJ - I think <img src="/forum/images/graemlins/crazy.gif" alt="" /> <img src="/forum/images/graemlins/laugh.gif" alt="" />
|
|
|
Re: GT28R v GT28RS
#173015
23/08/2006 14:28
23/08/2006 14:28
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
This might clear some stuff up - Garret turbo explanation . I thought the GT28RS had a 62mm compressor which makes it a GT2862RS in the new terminology anyway? John
|
|
|
Re: GT28R v GT28RS
#173016
23/08/2006 15:23
23/08/2006 15:23
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Compare a GT2860R to a GT2860RS. While both are ball bearing and externally similar, the GT2860RS is better suited for higher-flow applications than the GT2860R. In this case, the S reflects the higher-flowing nature of the GT2860RS thanks john would this be the GT 28r/rs hybrid that we are all thinking about? Joe <img src="/forum/images/graemlins/smile.gif" alt="" />
|
|
|
Re: GT28R v GT28RS
#173018
23/08/2006 16:05
23/08/2006 16:05
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
hmmm I did wonder ,...I wonder though what this smaller gt2860r Garrett are selling is then?
Its quite confusing all the changes, ATP is a lot easier! <img src="/forum/images/graemlins/wink.gif" alt="" />
Joe
|
|
|
Re: GT28R v GT28RS
#173019
23/08/2006 16:06
23/08/2006 16:06
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
I put myself the question nevertheless because I am lost a little in all these turbos GT2860R GT2860RS GT2871R GT2876R and with the various diameters of the turbines <img src="/forum/images/graemlins/confused.gif" alt="" />
|
|
|
Re: GT28R v GT28RS
#173020
23/08/2006 17:00
23/08/2006 17:00
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Does anyone have the GT Hybrid R/RS installed?
I am assuming that that price will be quite a bit dearer for this hybrid, including fitting? A figure of a £1000 comes to mind <img src="/forum/images/graemlins/confused.gif" alt="" />
However i guess it is the best of both worlds
|
|
|
Re: GT28R v GT28RS
#173021
23/08/2006 18:11
23/08/2006 18:11
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
I now have no idea what turbo I have <img src="/forum/images/graemlins/crazy.gif" alt="" /> <img src="/forum/images/graemlins/confused.gif" alt="" /> <img src="/forum/images/graemlins/grin.gif" alt="" /> <img src="/forum/images/graemlins/laugh.gif" alt="" />
|
|
|
Re: GT28R v GT28RS
#173023
23/08/2006 19:30
23/08/2006 19:30
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
I thought the Torque Italia one uses a GT28RS 62mm compressor and the GT28R turbine wheel? Maybe I'm just confusing everyone even more <img src="/forum/images/graemlins/laugh.gif" alt="" />
|
|
|
Re: GT28R v GT28RS
#173024
23/08/2006 20:25
23/08/2006 20:25
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
noooo <img src="/forum/images/graemlins/crazy.gif" alt="" /> <img src="/forum/images/graemlins/crazy.gif" alt="" />
please remove this post please <img src="/forum/images/graemlins/crazy.gif" alt="" /> <img src="/forum/images/graemlins/confused.gif" alt="" /> <img src="/forum/images/graemlins/frown.gif" alt="" />
|
|
|
Re: GT28R v GT28RS
#173025
23/08/2006 21:45
23/08/2006 21:45
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
I thought the Torque Italia one uses a GT28RS 62mm compressor and the GT28R turbine wheel? Maybe I'm just confusing everyone even more <img src="/forum/images/graemlins/laugh.gif" alt="" /> That's what it says on the TI website! Reading a bit on the Garrett site, it seems that the most important characteristic of a turbo is the A/R on the turbine side (I'm an expert after reading the Turbo 101 tutorial on their site <img src="/forum/images/graemlins/wink.gif" alt="" />). If you look at the ATP Turbos most people have bought, either the ATP - R or ATP - (.64)RS and the TI hybrid uses .64 as well ... maybe there's not that much difference between the turbos after all? Will a .64 RS really flow that much more? I know the trim of both wheels is also important (there's b*gger all difference between the TI hybrid and ATP R on this) and the ATP RS stands out a little on the trim front. Looking at the specs (and the design features that matter), you could conclude that: 1. there's bugger all differnce between the ATP R and the TI R/RS hybrid 2. there's not that much difference between the ATP R and ATP .64RS ... although u'll probably be able to flow a little more on the RS due to the turbine wheel? Perhaps the RR figures don't back this up, but then again maybe the people who bought an RS have their cars in a more aggressive state of tune? It would be really interesting to RR the same car with the same setup and only change the turbos!! I'm probably talking b*llox <img src="/forum/images/graemlins/smile.gif" alt="" />
Last edited by davidub; 23/08/2006 21:52.
|
|
|
Re: GT28R v GT28RS
#173026
23/08/2006 21:52
23/08/2006 21:52
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
don't forget different compressor or turbine wheels for that matter have different characteristics, so size and trim only tell half the story. Two compressor wheels can be the same size and trim but have completely different compressor maps.
john
|
|
|
Re: GT28R v GT28RS
#173027
23/08/2006 22:02
23/08/2006 22:02
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
don't forget different compressor or turbine wheels for that matter have different characteristics, so size and trim only tell half the story. Two compressor wheels can be the same size and trim but have completely different compressor maps.
john I'm not gonna even try to think how wheels the same size have different characteristics <img src="/forum/images/graemlins/smile.gif" alt="" /> If we can just get the maps for the TI Hybrid, we have all the facts!
|
|
|
Re: GT28R v GT28RS
#173028
23/08/2006 22:32
23/08/2006 22:32
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
The RS has a slightly bigger compressor wheel, but a lot bigger turbine wheel, that's why it can flow a lot more air, and the map demonstrates this. <img src="/forum/images/graemlins/smile.gif" alt="" />
Joe
|
|
|
Re: GT28R v GT28RS
#173029
23/08/2006 22:39
23/08/2006 22:39
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
The RS has a slightly bigger compressor wheel, but a lot bigger turbine wheel, that's why it can flow a lot more air, and the map demonstrates this. <img src="/forum/images/graemlins/smile.gif" alt="" />
Joe The turbine wheel is a good bit bigger, but with the .64 AR option on the turbine side, how much do you lose compared to the larger AR housing, what's the trade off? It would be nice to have access to a design tool that lets you overlay the maps, see how varying the parameters chages everything etc. Any mechanical engineers into fluid dynamics for a living that could help me out <img src="/forum/images/graemlins/idea.gif" alt="" />
Last edited by davidub; 23/08/2006 22:39.
|
|
|
Re: GT28R v GT28RS
#173030
23/08/2006 22:52
23/08/2006 22:52
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
David, yes that would be nice. It appears that you will lose 5-600rpm spool-up between the 0.64 and 0.86 housings, but the 0.86 does flow a little bit more at the top end. for instance, Flea and myself have virtually identically tuned cars, the only difference is that Flea runs the 0.86 GT28rs and I run the 0.64 GT28rs. His car ran 370bhp, and mine ran 363bhp, but on different days, and oddly mine ran more at the wheel, so its hard to compare. We both drove each others cars and raced them <img src="/forum/images/graemlins/wink.gif" alt="" /> <img src="/forum/images/graemlins/laugh.gif" alt="" />, and I think fleas car was slightly quicker 6000-7000rpm, but my car had better spool-up, so overall the race was dead even 50-140mph! Have a read here, it might be of interest Frag vs Flea. Joe
|
|
|
Re: GT28R v GT28RS
#173032
23/08/2006 23:26
23/08/2006 23:26
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
That said, if you look at the PTS graphs, Joe seems to be making more power at low revs than Markus, - or am I going cross eyed with all the lines?
|
|
|
Re: GT28R v GT28RS
#173034
23/08/2006 23:40
23/08/2006 23:40
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Given the choice now I would go with a Torque Italia hybrid as it has the mix just about right... and the price is pretty keen too! <img src="/forum/images/graemlins/smile.gif" alt="" />
I'll give Barbz a ring so <img src="/forum/images/graemlins/cool.gif" alt="" />
|
|
|
Re: GT28R v GT28RS
#173035
24/08/2006 03:19
24/08/2006 03:19
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
I have not had the chance to fully test my TI Hybrid but I’m pretty sure it is the BEST turbo for my level of tune as I want all my power in the mid.
The way I see it is this: GT2560R (.64) = Very Fast Spool Up, good mid and weak top end, rated to 330BHP GT28/R/RS (.64) = Fast Spool Up, great mid and good top end, rated to 350BHP GT2860RS (.64) = Slow Spool Up, good mid and great top end, rated to 360BHP GT2860RS (.84) = Slower Spool Up, great mid and great top end, rated to 360BHP GT2871R = Laggy Spool UP great mid and very good top end rated to 400BHP
So in conclusion you must know what work you are doing to your engine and where you want your power band to be before committing to any turbo. Every turbo has its good and bad points it's just down to your preference.
|
|
|
Re: GT28R v GT28RS
#173037
24/08/2006 04:33
24/08/2006 04:33
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
TurboJ, to put this into perspective with straight induction etc, I get 1 bar at 3000-3100rpm with the gt2860rs (0.64) which is only just over 100-200rpm worse than my GtI-R hybrid.
Joe
|
|
|
Re: GT28R v GT28RS
#173038
24/08/2006 04:34
24/08/2006 04:34
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Your analysis is a little over-simplified and the figures aren't quite "correct" but agree that the TI hybrid would be the best bet for what you want <img src="/forum/images/graemlins/wink.gif" alt="" /> Well best to keep it simple as we don't wanna start a major confusion again <img src="/forum/images/graemlins/laugh.gif" alt="" />. And i'm sure you will agree with me that it all depends on where you want the power band and engine tunning stage. How do you know what i want you been peaking at my spec sheet? <img src="/forum/images/graemlins/wink.gif" alt="" />
|
|
|
Re: GT28R v GT28RS
#173039
24/08/2006 04:37
24/08/2006 04:37
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
TurboJ, to put this into perspective with straight induction etc, I get 1 bat at 3000-3100rpm with the gt2860rs (0.64) which is only just over 100-200rpm worse than my GtI-R hybrid.
Joe Yes thats all good and well i'm not saying its bad but if you had the TI Hybrid or the R it would spool up even quicker. I just put them in order of spool up thats all. As i say it all depends on the rest of your car.
|
|
|
Re: GT28R v GT28RS
#173040
24/08/2006 04:46
24/08/2006 04:46
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Indeed <img src="/forum/images/graemlins/cool.gif" alt="" />
I might have considered the TI hybrid if it had been around when I got the GT28rs, but noone had fitted the o.64 at the time so was a bit of a gamble <img src="/forum/images/graemlins/wink.gif" alt="" /> as my main aim was a strong road going/trackday turbo, I didnt want it to be any laggier than normal ,but had to accept a little bit of extra lag. The only downside is that boost comes in hard and fast which can put too much strain on the GTA/Walkers clutch.
regards
Joe <img src="/forum/images/graemlins/smile.gif" alt="" />
|
|
|
Re: GT28R v GT28RS
#173041
24/08/2006 15:29
24/08/2006 15:29
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Hi all,
for my configuration, I've in more a SI and a pro allow intercooler. I think that the gt28r/rs 0.64 is the most adapted
Do you also think?
thanks
|
|
|
|