0 registered members (),
207
guests, and 11
spiders. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums70
Topics113,746
Posts1,340,472
Members1,693
|
Most Online2,346 Apr 14th, 2025
|
|
|
optimax VS tesco 99 RON
#231983
07/11/2006 14:55
07/11/2006 14:55
|
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,588 Essex
Rog20VT
OP
I need some sleep
|
OP
I need some sleep
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,588
Essex
|
has anyone noticed any real difference? shell garages are not very common around here, (unless someone knows otherwise?) so so its tesco all the way. discuss!! 
|
|
|
Re: optimax VS tesco 99 RON
#231986
07/11/2006 15:18
07/11/2006 15:18
|
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 928 Wimbledon
paddy
Enjoying the ride
|
Enjoying the ride
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 928
Wimbledon
|
Tesco 99 RON is made by greenenergy, and is meant to be pretty highly respected. Some results here sugest it is better than Optimax: http://www.thorneymotorsport.co.uk/gcs_a...t%3D0%26toc%3D1Having said that shell have just switched to v-power, which is advertised as 99RON, so it may be that they are more closely matched now? I always use shell, as I don't have a Tesco near me 
|
|
|
Re: optimax VS tesco 99 RON
#231988
07/11/2006 15:22
07/11/2006 15:22
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Rog, I find Tescos 99 fuel to give me the strongest midrange, Optimax is similar to Tescos at the top end.
Joe
|
|
|
Re: optimax VS tesco 99 RON
#231990
07/11/2006 15:44
07/11/2006 15:44
|
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,588 Essex
Rog20VT
OP
I need some sleep
|
OP
I need some sleep
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,588
Essex
|
yes guys, i used the word optimaz forgetting that its now V-power. i did suspect that V-power would be the better choice. im not running any ignition advance off of the unichip at all, but im hearing some pinking at higher boost (1.3 bar) on 95 ron fuel so will run some 99 to see if it stops. cheers guys. 
|
|
|
Re: optimax VS tesco 99 RON
#231992
07/11/2006 15:59
07/11/2006 15:59
|
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 928 Wimbledon
paddy
Enjoying the ride
|
Enjoying the ride
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 928
Wimbledon
|
Yeah, some of the newer cars can adapt much better to diffrent fuel qualities. I think on some of the newer cars, the ECU can get a reading from the spark plugs, as to the amount of electrical resistance whilst the plug sparks. This can give the ECU a clearer picture about what is going on in each cylinder  Is the 20VT ECU adaptive? will a standard chip make changes when given a good quality high octane fuel, or is it just much less likely to retard the ignition due to it being less likely to sense detonation occuring? Is the only way GTEC 2 / unichip / re-map?
Last edited by paddy; 07/11/2006 16:04.
|
|
|
Re: optimax VS tesco 99 RON
#231994
07/11/2006 16:34
07/11/2006 16:34
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
But - in reality - we will notice a big difference on a Novitec/Gtec-chipped 20VT, as long as it still has it's std. boost management (EBV). With a reset ECU I get around: 99octane V-Power: 1.4bar 98octane Jet: 1.3bar 95octane Jet: 1.1bar (on hotter days even less) I run the Novitec chip + clean EBV.. 
|
|
|
Re: optimax VS tesco 99 RON
#231995
07/11/2006 16:57
07/11/2006 16:57
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Quote:
Joe - which was your car mapped on? I think you mean V-Power
John, it has almost always been mapped on Optimax 98ron, although I think it had a combination of the two last time.
joe
|
|
|
Re: optimax VS tesco 99 RON
#231998
07/11/2006 17:27
07/11/2006 17:27
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
If you use a poorer quality fuel you'll probably get det.. which is bad. However it is really down to the mapper to set the car up to be 'safe'.
I was reading a cached version of DocFrag's aquamist post yesterday and Paul at PTS would wind his ignition back to stay safe if he ever got a bad batch of fuel etc.
For the record, i've run both these fuels for at least 5 tanks before switching to the other fuel. My drive is mainly stop start through London and i noticed my average run on a tank was 280 using Tesco99 and it was 320 using optimax (as it was back then). This was running on a Gtec1 and SMIC.
|
|
|
Re: optimax VS tesco 99 RON
#231999
07/11/2006 19:25
07/11/2006 19:25
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Totally agree with Ken's findings on MPG. Get much better mileage out of the V-power. On both cars. Like Rog though, sadly the nearest Shell garage is miles away.
|
|
|
Re: optimax VS tesco 99 RON
#232000
07/11/2006 20:30
07/11/2006 20:30
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Im going to have heart failure the first time i fill up on this stuff 
|
|
|
Re: optimax VS tesco 99 RON
#232001
07/11/2006 20:35
07/11/2006 20:35
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Think V-Power's bad? Go fill up a handful of times on BP102. £121 per tank! 
|
|
|
Re: optimax VS tesco 99 RON
#232002
07/11/2006 21:38
07/11/2006 21:38
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Yeah but thats just silly unless your going to get mapped on it and use it on the track....
|
|
|
Re: optimax VS tesco 99 RON
#232003
08/11/2006 01:14
08/11/2006 01:14
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
|
|
|
Re: optimax VS tesco 99 RON
#232004
08/11/2006 01:19
08/11/2006 01:19
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
I have used nothing but v-power in my new engine and personally its very responsive!!!
Ross
|
|
|
Re: optimax VS tesco 99 RON
#232005
08/11/2006 07:06
08/11/2006 07:06
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
|
|
|
Re: optimax VS tesco 99 RON
#232007
08/11/2006 18:03
08/11/2006 18:03
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
So is teh scooby iirc coming from the east its meant to have higher stuff anyhoo.
They could have done with showing the cleaning properties and a car after say 30k miles on the power runs as well...
|
|
|
|