|
0 registered members (),
1,008
guests, and 5
spiders. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Forums48
Topics103,726
Posts1,170,177
Members1,666
| |
Most Online39,516 Apr 16th, 2026
|
|
|
Re: 400 bhp
#246784
27/11/2006 22:52
27/11/2006 22:52
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
hmmmm, is the Alcon paddle much different to the Helix paddle (or are we talking the same thing here?)?
The Helix was better than the Walkers paddle it seemed a very light clutch, very on/off, but I did half think I could possibly get used to it?
Joe
|
|
|
Re: 400 bhp
#246785
27/11/2006 23:02
27/11/2006 23:02
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
As far as feel goes who makes the paddle is probably not going to make a great deal of difference. I don't think any of them are very heavy, certainly not on/off. If you've driven some TVRs etc. you'll find what on/off is <img src="/forum/images/graemlins/smile.gif" alt="" />
|
|
|
Re: 400 bhp
#246786
28/11/2006 03:09
28/11/2006 03:09
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Mine is from walkers (Alcon) damn need to really get used to it, its just the juddering in low gears or coming down that bothers me
|
|
|
Re: 400 bhp
#246787
28/11/2006 03:22
28/11/2006 03:22
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
having driven the helix twin plate version, IT IS HEAVY, probably twice that of the OEM shite, but actually very useable <img src="/forum/images/graemlins/cool.gif" alt="" />
I could actually feather it & pull away at 1500 rpm without much judder / if none at all, you can also change up / down without any drama <img src="/forum/images/graemlins/cool.gif" alt="" />
how cool a conversion is that ?
I am still wimping out & going for a single plate version ( sprung ceremetallic with increased pre-load )
this is my ONLY experiment, if not, there are a few more to try, but as with all things & the fact that there aren't many coops yet that develop disgusting torque ( 450 lbft ), the typical clutch is still adequate, so the experimentation of differing clutches is not exhausted <img src="/forum/images/graemlins/smile.gif" alt="" />
as for 400bhp, easy to attain on a 2ltr lump ( flea manages this easy ) , but there are some drawbacks, low end torque could be lost ( due to headwork etc ) & the fact that other things start to suffer ( aux belts ! <img src="/forum/images/graemlins/shocked.gif" alt="" /> )
all depends on what you want, personally if my engine hadn't gone south, I'd have kept it as it was <img src="/forum/images/graemlins/smile.gif" alt="" />
....certainly never unhappy having a bit of poke <img src="/forum/images/graemlins/smirk.gif" alt="" />
|
|
|
Re: 400 bhp
#246788
30/11/2006 17:30
30/11/2006 17:30
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Might be worth double-checking your engine mountings are sound, if you can't overcome the juddering. <img src="/forum/images/graemlins/idea.gif" alt="" /> Rgrds, Justin
|
|
|
Re: 400 bhp
#246789
30/11/2006 20:16
30/11/2006 20:16
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
engine mounts were changed also
|
|
|
|