Fiat Coupe Forum
- Funded by the Club for the benefit of all owners
- Please consider joining the Club to help keep the Forum running
- Or you can choose to make a Donation
Fiat Coupe Club UK
join the club
Fiat Coupe Forum
 
» Club Members only
    Workshop manual


» Announced
    Posting images


» Related sites
    Main club site
    fiatcoupe.net

 
Who's Online Now
2 registered members (carmine, 1 invisible), 733 guests, and 6 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums48
Topics103,770
Posts1,170,654
Members1,682
Most Online39,516
Apr 15th, 2026
Top Posters(All Time)
barnacle 33,794
stan 32,123
Theresa 23,349
PeteP 22,314
bockers 21,083
Edinburgh 19,092
JimO 17,919
Nigel 17,387
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2
Quicker to cycle?? #371533
07/06/2007 17:09
07/06/2007 17:09

A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A



Cycled to work today, left home at about 8.20 so prime rush hour around here and it's about 4.5 miles. Spotted a blue 20vt (not a forum user I think as I have seen it around plenty of times and ver had a response to my "spotted" posts) about 5 minutes or so from home or the main road...I ride up the main road and then cut up a side street and down into a local village and then wiggle around and go through a park, takes about another 5 minutes I reckon...I again spot said coupe as I go into the park laugh

I ride through the park, up a bit, along a bit, down a hill and I drop down onto the main road...come up to the next lights and I see said coupe again stuck in traffic at the lights (probably another 7 minutes) laugh I reckon the actual distance is about the same...

I think, right gonna beat you laugh So I ride along the main road, lots of queued traffic and me outrunning the barely moving cars the cars (note I do not weave in and out, always go between the queued cars and the pavement, using cycle lanes if there is one)... get to Epsom town centre in about another 6 minutes and no sign of the coupe (have seen in Epsom before so must work in or around here)

So, Vickster on push bike 1 - Coupe 20vt 0 tongue (note as those who know me will attest that I am no Lance Armstrong laugh )...or should that be Vickster 1-cra*py rush hour, school run traffic in Surrey 0 rolleyes

Plan to cycle as much as possible during the summer (although it will be slower come mid July when the schools break up) smile

Re: Quicker to cycle?? [Re: ] #371538
07/06/2007 17:15
07/06/2007 17:15
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,648
Ireland !!!!
D
darmtb Offline
club member 1890
darmtb  Offline
club member 1890
My life on the forum
D

Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,648
Ireland !!!!
LOL well done laugh , should be in the Coupé vs section tongue
Mind the roads !!


[Linked Image]
"Mighty MO"
Re: Quicker to cycle?? [Re: ] #371539
07/06/2007 17:16
07/06/2007 17:16

A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A



I used to love riding my bike into work when it was the summer.It was about 4.5 miles & mostly downhill.
Coming home (mostly uphill) was knackering,so i'd get my dad to collect me from work laugh.


Re: Quicker to cycle?? [Re: ] #371542
07/06/2007 17:19
07/06/2007 17:19

A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A



My trip is probably more uphill on the way there, the first 10 minutes pretty much are which is a bit of a killer shocked

There is a steep hill after the park that I go down, on the way home I have to get off and push as I can't get up it blush I do feel a bit more awake in the mornings at work if I've cycled and it's a lot less stressful smile

Re: Quicker to cycle?? [Re: ] #371546
07/06/2007 17:23
07/06/2007 17:23

A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A



The biggest hill for me was just outside my village on the way home. It felt like climbing Everest after a hard day, you would see a few others get off & push. Which was good really as they all chat to each other on the way up.

Re: Quicker to cycle?? [Re: ] #371557
07/06/2007 17:41
07/06/2007 17:41

A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A



My commute is a 30 mile round trip. I have cycled it faster than the coop can drive it on an average day and more often than not I'm within 5 minutes of the average coop time.

There is not a huge amount of traffic, three sets of lights and 5 roundabouts. You'de be amased though how much time one set of lights can eat up for a driver.

It's when a headwind kicks in that the times drop dramatically. It's on those rides home that I question my sanity for cycling when I could be driving home in the coolest car in the world.

Re: Quicker to cycle?? [Re: ] #371571
07/06/2007 18:12
07/06/2007 18:12

A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A



Well done Vickster, I'm envious of the fact you have the option to cycle to work. I like cycling but live too far.

You'll be surprised at how your fitness level should improve as you cycle more, and I reckon after a week or 2 you might find yourself able to cycle up that steep hill instead of pushing.

PS Hope you wear a helmet! smile

Re: Quicker to cycle?? [Re: ] #371600
07/06/2007 18:48
07/06/2007 18:48

A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A



I used to commute from SW London to East London (About 11 miles). On average door to door during rush hour, times as follows:

Car - 1Hr
Tube - 50 mins
Bike - 38 mins

A bike around London is always a winner, but you always fear that it won't be there when you get back to where you left it.

Re: Quicker to cycle?? [Re: ] #371601
07/06/2007 18:49
07/06/2007 18:49
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 17,919
J
JimO Offline
Forum veteran
JimO  Offline
Forum veteran
J

Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 17,919
I used to have a car like that tongue

Re: Quicker to cycle?? [Re: ] #371606
07/06/2007 18:54
07/06/2007 18:54

A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A



Originally Posted by DanielTheManual
PS Hope you wear a helmet! smile
Yep and mitts, and fluorescent things in the dark and I have lights...and I'm pretty law abiding too smile

Re: Quicker to cycle?? [Re: ] #371608
07/06/2007 18:55
07/06/2007 18:55

A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A



Originally Posted by Kenno

A bike around London is always a winner, but you always fear that it won't be there when you get back to where you left it.
Secure underground parking wink

Re: Quicker to cycle?? [Re: ] #371612
07/06/2007 18:59
07/06/2007 18:59

A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A



4.5 miles?

You should be running it, not cycling....

Either way, deffo not in a car.

Re: Quicker to cycle?? [Re: ] #371615
07/06/2007 19:03
07/06/2007 19:03
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 2,581
London
MrCooper Offline
I need some sleep
MrCooper  Offline
I need some sleep

Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 2,581
London
Absolutely. My journey to work is 10 miles each way. It's:
50mins (minimum) door to door by pub trans/walking
40mins (minimum) door to door by car and
45mins door to door by bike.
1hr15/1hr20 on foot.

Like vickster I have secure parking, and yes full flourescance is a must. There are some idiots though, who come blaxzing down a dual carriage (i.e. busy) road, in rush hour, wearing no high-viz, no helmet, and to put the icing on the cake listening to their headphones so they can not hear a damn thing. They must be, quite literally, mental!!!

Kenno, you must really nail it to do 11 miles in 38 mins (although my 10 miles does inlcude a very large hill).

Last edited by MrCooper; 07/06/2007 19:04.


Ex Grigio Moon 20VT Plus
Ex 350Z
Now Aston Martin Vantage

Re: Quicker to cycle?? [Re: ] #371618
07/06/2007 19:07
07/06/2007 19:07
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 21,083
Chertsey in the Thames
bockers Offline
Hon Club Member 007
bockers  Offline
Hon Club Member 007
Forum Fossil

Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 21,083
Chertsey in the Thames
11 miles each way for me. Including changing and showering it takes 50mins. Only takes 25 in the car but then i would need to go to the gym for an hour laugh And I don't wear a useless expensive polystyrene cup on my head wink

Re: Quicker to cycle?? [Re: ] #371622
07/06/2007 19:12
07/06/2007 19:12

A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A



Originally Posted by Hedge
4.5 miles?

You should be running it, not cycling....

Either way, deffo not in a car.
I do NOT run!! Oh and we have no showers, could not get away with it if I ran !! sick

Bockers is more of a pro cyclist than me, I've only had a bike again for 9 months and didn't use it for 6 of those wink

Re: Quicker to cycle?? [Re: ] #371624
07/06/2007 19:13
07/06/2007 19:13

A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A



4.5 miles on a bike and no shower?

Yuk.

Soap-dodger......!

Re: Quicker to cycle?? [Re: MrCooper] #371625
07/06/2007 19:15
07/06/2007 19:15

A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A



Originally Posted by MrCooper
Kenno, you must really nail it to do 11 miles in 38 mins (although my 10 miles does inlcude a very large hill).


London is pretty flat and I catch a draft from buses whenever i can. laugh Oh and having a carbon road bike does help. wink

Useless polystyrene cup!! I've got my lid to thank for not having to visit A&E.. twice.

Last edited by Kenno; 07/06/2007 19:17. Reason: just read what bockers said.
Re: Quicker to cycle?? [Re: ] #371628
07/06/2007 19:18
07/06/2007 19:18

A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A



Originally Posted by Vickster
Originally Posted by Kenno

A bike around London is always a winner, but you always fear that it won't be there when you get back to where you left it.
Secure underground parking wink


Not at Sainsburys local... yet wink

Re: Quicker to cycle?? [Re: ] #371632
07/06/2007 19:26
07/06/2007 19:26
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 2,581
London
MrCooper Offline
I need some sleep
MrCooper  Offline
I need some sleep

Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 2,581
London
Originally Posted by Kenno
[quote=MrCooper]having a carbon road bike does help.


Nice. I have a folder (full size MTB not a birdy) based on a Dahon Matrix frameset. It's quick and nimble with good shocks, but its not a hardcore road machine which makes a big difference on the speed stakes.

I've always found the harsher, more bent forward ride you get from a road bike coupled with the narrow saddles gives me ball ache.



Ex Grigio Moon 20VT Plus
Ex 350Z
Now Aston Martin Vantage

Re: Quicker to cycle?? [Re: ] #371634
07/06/2007 19:32
07/06/2007 19:32

A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A



Good on ya Vickster, show that coupe whos boss laugh

Ive been riding to and from the station for about 5 weeks and apart from my first bike being stolen grr its about the fastest method of getting to the station (not including a lift from the wife (5-10 mins)

Cycle 15 mins
Walk and Bus 25-30 mins
Walk 40-45 mins

I also find it quite a nice stress reducer smile

Re: Quicker to cycle?? [Re: ] #371648
07/06/2007 20:13
07/06/2007 20:13
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 13,206
england
came2dance Offline
I AM a Coop
came2dance  Offline
I AM a Coop

Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 13,206
england
hmmm I might just dig my bike out of the garage where it's sat for the last five years. Not for commuting though as it's 15 miles each way with an 8:00 clock start shocked

Quote
I ride up the main road and then cut up a side street and down into a local village and then wiggle around and go through a park, takes about another 5 minutes I reckon...I again spot said coupe as I go into the park


any pics of the bit where you wiggle through the park tongue

Quote
Absolutely. My journey to work is 10 miles each way. It's:
50mins (minimum) door to door by pub trans/walking
40mins (minimum) door to door by car and
45mins door to door by bike.
1hr15/1hr20 on foot.


1 hr 15 for walking shocked is that right. Sounds a bit quick to me, but I've never tried it. smile You could walk the London Marathon and beat half the runners laugh




[Linked Image]www.chrisdoyle-photography.co.uk

Re: Quicker to cycle?? [Re: ] #371660
07/06/2007 20:32
07/06/2007 20:32

A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A



Originally Posted by Hedge
4.5 miles on a bike and no shower?

Yuk.

Soap-dodger......!


I shower before I leave home, I take fresh clothes and deodorant with me...remember we women glow, or at the worst perspire...we don't sweat wink No-one has complained yet crazy

Re: Quicker to cycle?? [Re: ] #371661
07/06/2007 20:36
07/06/2007 20:36
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 21,083
Chertsey in the Thames
bockers Offline
Hon Club Member 007
bockers  Offline
Hon Club Member 007
Forum Fossil

Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 21,083
Chertsey in the Thames
Originally Posted by Kenno
Originally Posted by MrCooper
Kenno, you must really nail it to do 11 miles in 38 mins (although my 10 miles does inlcude a very large hill).


London is pretty flat and I catch a draft from buses whenever i can. laugh Oh and having a carbon road bike does help. wink

Useless polystyrene cup!! I've got my lid to thank for not having to visit A&E.. twice.
But how do you know laugh

When I was working in Holborn Circus and communting 25 miles (only twice a week mind) the average journey speed went up as soon as i have passed Hammersmith, from there to Holborn you are going faster or as fast as a car.

I also find Central London safer to cycle in than the lanes of Surrey where cars are squeazing by at great speed. London cycling is very exilerating too laugh

Re: Quicker to cycle?? [Re: came2dance] #371667
07/06/2007 20:47
07/06/2007 20:47
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 2,581
London
MrCooper Offline
I need some sleep
MrCooper  Offline
I need some sleep

Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 2,581
London
Originally Posted by came2dance
1 hr 15 for walking shocked is that right.


No, that's running!!! works out to a 1hr40 half marathon and a 3hr40 marathon.



Ex Grigio Moon 20VT Plus
Ex 350Z
Now Aston Martin Vantage

Re: Quicker to cycle?? [Re: MrCooper] #371668
07/06/2007 20:54
07/06/2007 20:54

A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A



Originally Posted by MrCooper
more bent forward ride you get from a road bike coupled with the narrow saddles gives me ball ache.


you can't be sat on it correctly.. or you have big kahuna's!! LOL.

Re: Quicker to cycle?? [Re: ] #371695
07/06/2007 21:47
07/06/2007 21:47
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 2,581
London
MrCooper Offline
I need some sleep
MrCooper  Offline
I need some sleep

Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 2,581
London
Originally Posted by Kenno
you can't be sat on it correctly.. or you have big kahuna's!! LOL.


I'm glad to say that I've no frame of reference on the kahunas question.

I've always thought that the saddle angle must be a contributory factor. I assume a downward slant (towards the front wheel) is better? Is there anything else? If that's ruled out I'd have to conclude its down to overly large (or overly sensitive) kahunas!!! crazy



Ex Grigio Moon 20VT Plus
Ex 350Z
Now Aston Martin Vantage

Re: Quicker to cycle?? [Re: MrCooper] #371705
07/06/2007 22:25
07/06/2007 22:25

A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A



I could cycle to work but getting back up the stairs at the end of the day is a pain.

Re: Quicker to cycle?? [Re: ] #371713
07/06/2007 22:45
07/06/2007 22:45

A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A



Originally Posted by DanielTheManual


You'll be surprised at how your fitness level should improve as you cycle more, and I reckon after a week or 2 you might find yourself able to cycle up that steep hill instead of pushing.
I cycled up it tonight, quite slowly and in a rather low gear and I was panting and my legs were hurting when I made it to the top, but yay laugh

Re: Quicker to cycle?? [Re: ] #371736
07/06/2007 23:30
07/06/2007 23:30
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 333
London
dazzle Offline
Making a profit
dazzle  Offline
Making a profit

Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 333
London
About the only thing I swap my coupe for is the bike. Get to work awake, no fuel costs and no need to go to gym. My ride is only 15 minutes and would be longer by car. Bonus is want to drive the coupe all weekend smile

Re: Quicker to cycle?? [Re: bockers] #371754
08/06/2007 00:00
08/06/2007 00:00

A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A



Originally Posted by bockers
11 miles each way for me. Including changing and showering it takes 50mins. Only takes 25 in the car but then i would need to go to the gym for an hour laugh And I don't wear a useless expensive polystyrene cup on my head wink


Admittedly they're not much use if you're going to get run over by a lorry, but one of those 'useless expensive polystyrene cups' saved my mates life. Sometimes i dont wear my pads or gloves but i ALWAYS wear a helmet, even if i'm just riding to the shop. Drain covers are a lot harder than my skull (i found that one out when i was 3, and i still have the scare to prove it)

Good effort on the cycling though Vickster, you'll be flying up that hill in no time.

Page 1 of 2 1 2

Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.1
(Release build 20190129)
PHP: 7.4.33 Page Time: 0.020s Queries: 15 (0.012s) Memory: 0.7238 MB (Peak: 0.9591 MB) Data Comp: Off Server Time: 2026-11-11 18:30:24 UTC