Fiat Coupe Forum
- Funded by the Club for the benefit of all owners
- Please consider joining the Club to help keep the Forum running
- Or you can choose to make a Donation
Fiat Coupe Club UK
join the club
Fiat Coupe Forum
 
» Announced
    Posting images


» Related sites
    Main club site
    fiatcoupe.net

 
Who's Online Now
0 registered members (), 174 guests, and 3 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums48
Topics103,630
Posts1,169,323
Members1,605
Most Online39,516
Apr 16th, 2026
Top Posters(All Time)
barnacle 33,794
stan 32,123
Theresa 23,344
PeteP 22,247
bockers 21,083
Edinburgh 18,688
JimO 17,919
Nigel 17,386
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Engine bay ambient temperature test results #386798
02/07/2007 17:40
02/07/2007 17:40
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 5,241
Anywhere that has roads
W
Welformed Offline OP
Forum is my life
Welformed  Offline OP
Forum is my life
W

Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 5,241
Anywhere that has roads
Well kinda ongoing...

I've been playing around with temperature sensors this weekend, by placing them in different places in my engine bay to try and find out if heat soak really is a problem for Coops.

Mostly the external temperature was about 20 degrees.

First I put it around various unspectacular locations in the middle of the engine bay to read the ambient temps there. At cold it was on average 20C, the same as the external temp as you would expect. When driving and up to ragging temps it was reading on average 33C. When hooning it would rise to about 40C and if stopped in traffic for a few seconds, would keep rising and rising and...! Scarey. In fact the ambient temps would not drop unless I was doing 35mph or more and would take about 2 mins or so before the temps would drop below 40C.

Then I put the sensor in the Airbox...

Interesting. Now knowing what the ambient temps were doing in the engine bay, I was expecting this to be higher than the external temps. But no. Whatever I did, the temp would stay almost exactly the same as the external temp. Even if the car had been ragged and then sat in traffic for a few minutes, within a few seconds of driving the Airbox temp would be the same as external temps (and the airbox temp never really went above 25C as long as some throttle was used, sucking air in), especially if driven at considerably more than 35mph, but still off-boost.

I have a cold air feed as well. Which I plugged this up and hoped the airbox temps would be a bit higher, but from what I could see they were the same.

Conclusion - With the standard airbox it seems that it really does suck all the cool air in from the outside and is completely unaffected by heat soak in the engine bay. And cold air feeds do jack, although mine isn't connected up as nice as it should be. I wonder if I can be bothered now!

Question - I wonder how different this is with cars that have a monster air filter and doesn't seem to suck air in directed straight from the front of the car?


A 340Bhp, 300lb/ft powered thread hijacker
Re: Engine bay ambient temperature test results [Re: Welformed] #386822
02/07/2007 17:54
02/07/2007 17:54

A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A



I have a cone filter in the std. airbox position and when it was fitted the garage did some tests and reported that it was getting lots of cool air in this position and as a result they felt it wasn't worth placing it in the "riskier" SMIC position (although obviously this gives you a straight run to the turbo).

Re: Engine bay ambient temperature test results [Re: ] #386966
02/07/2007 19:52
02/07/2007 19:52

A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A



I've got 4 temperature sensors.

A. Ambient (behind right fog lamp)
B. Chargecooler coolant
C. After FMIC
D. After chargecooler

If the A is 15deg, B is 17 deg, C is 20 and D is around 18/19. Pootling around town the temps go up a little so maxium inlet temp (even after chargecooler) is around 27. C never gets that high, maybe 25 max.

If I'm booting it however C rises steadily, however D actually starts to get lower! until they cross over at which D stays constant and C keeps going up.

I haven't had chance to do any really good testing yet. I wanna try some 1/4 mile with the same starting temps and monitor C/D.

Chris

Edited: I've also noticed that the sensor behing the C/C is actually quite prone to heat soak. Remember the thermostat is just below the inlet and the throttle also has a coolant jacket around it to prevent icing in the winter month. I've since removed this and diverted coolant straight back to the expansion tank

Last edited by Nobby; 02/07/2007 19:54.
Re: Engine bay ambient temperature test results [Re: ] #387064
02/07/2007 21:49
02/07/2007 21:49
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 5,241
Anywhere that has roads
W
Welformed Offline OP
Forum is my life
Welformed  Offline OP
Forum is my life
W

Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 5,241
Anywhere that has roads
Originally Posted by Nobby
I've got 4 temperature sensors.

A. Ambient (behind right fog lamp)
B. Chargecooler coolant
C. After FMIC
D. After chargecooler


There's always someone who brags about being better equipped! tongue

See, I was going to stick a sensor in the piping, somewhere after the SMIC and before the Inlet manifold, but resisted against this for fear of it being sucked off in the airflow! Sucked off.. tee hee ...anyway, so what probes... er, I mean what sensors do you use? Did you just wedge the wiring in the piping?

It's all interesting results though. I had no idea that the engine bay temps get so high, yet the airbox is so unaffected.

Your car must fly with those charge temps!


A 340Bhp, 300lb/ft powered thread hijacker
Re: Engine bay ambient temperature test results [Re: Welformed] #387494
03/07/2007 14:38
03/07/2007 14:38

A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A



I use the maplins temperature sensors, with maplins display, box etc...

My sensors are mounted inside pipe adapters (the blue type that connect oil/fuel braided lines in motorsport). I've then got aluminium hose joiners (between Samco hoses) with a threaded hole, and the adapter screws into this. It keeps sealed and there's no danger of sensors falling off and getting sucked in/out.

Here's my original display unit - Mk1

Thought that was a bit bulky so I compacted it all into a new display - here's the thread from it - Mk2

Chris

Re: Engine bay ambient temperature test results [Re: ] #387611
03/07/2007 17:41
03/07/2007 17:41
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 17,386
Staffordshire
Nigel Offline
Forum veteran
Nigel  Offline
Forum veteran

Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 17,386
Staffordshire
I use the same Maplins sensor, with one probe just after the airfilter and another one just before the throttle body.

My findings were very much like Welformed's - once moving, there is very little difference between air intake temps and ambient.

However, heatsoak is a definite issue when you've been sitting in traffic for a while, especially with a chargecooler (which can become a charge-heater). Chargetemps at the throttle body take a while longer to drop once the car is moving.

Also of interest is the length of time it can take for the temps to drop - even after parking overnight, I can still see temps of over 20 degrees in the morning until I start the engine and suck cold air through

Nobby - do you fire your CC fans off the Maplins display unit?

I'd thought about activating an IC water spray using a setting on the display unit, but I rarely see more than 30 degrees when driving, even at 1.5 bar, so I can't be bothered.

Re: Engine bay ambient temperature test results [Re: Nigel] #387650
03/07/2007 18:21
03/07/2007 18:21
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 5,241
Anywhere that has roads
W
Welformed Offline OP
Forum is my life
Welformed  Offline OP
Forum is my life
W

Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 5,241
Anywhere that has roads
Interesting. With traffic becoming a problem and how fast the engine bay heats up, it seems that maybe CC may not be the best mod? Certainly not one that can be used at short notice.

I take it you have an exposed A/F?


A 340Bhp, 300lb/ft powered thread hijacker
Re: Engine bay ambient temperature test results [Re: Welformed] #387655
03/07/2007 18:27
03/07/2007 18:27

A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A



Chris that first one wouldnt look out of place on a Russian space station laugh

Well done for monitoring at different points , very interesting findings.

Re: Engine bay ambient temperature test results [Re: ] #387678
03/07/2007 18:55
03/07/2007 18:55

A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A



Nigel - no I've got a manual switch. There were far too many cables inside the box already. Plus the connector I used only has 8 pins and all are used for the 4 sensors input

Simlarly lots of the connectors aren't rated that highly so that rules out the switch as a power feed (I've used a switch plus relay anyway now, negates the high feed problem)

Kevin - LOL. <Yuri_Gagarin>Moscov we have problem, chaarje temperachuresss are high.... laugh

Welformed - yep. Straigt induction pipe plus K&N

Re: Engine bay ambient temperature test results [Re: ] #387694
03/07/2007 19:48
03/07/2007 19:48

A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A



Well done! It seems Fiat engineers were no boneheads after all.. (lots of people seems to think so..) smile


Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.1
(Release build 20190129)
PHP: 7.4.33 Page Time: 0.012s Queries: 14 (0.007s) Memory: 0.6294 MB (Peak: 0.7296 MB) Data Comp: Off Server Time: 2026-06-25 02:17:16 UTC