Forums69
Topics113,623
Posts1,341,321
Members1,807
|
Most Online731 Jan 14th, 2020
|
|
|
1.5 bar
#434023
12/09/2007 21:47
12/09/2007 21:47
|
h2ypr
Unregistered
|
h2ypr
Unregistered
|
What is the main problem with running this kinda boost? Is it the heat thats generated? If so, if the mixture (afr) is rich enough, would this eliminate the problem?
Say for instance the coupe was running 1.5 bar with 10.3-10.5 afr. Would this be safe to do so?
Ross
|
|
|
Re: 1.5 bar
[Re: ]
#434033
12/09/2007 22:15
12/09/2007 22:15
|
Shippy
Unregistered
|
Shippy
Unregistered
|
I guess flea may be your best bet for this info? He is the only one I have seen run over 1.5 bar (1.7 in 3rd I think???)
|
|
|
Re: 1.5 bar
[Re: ]
#434034
12/09/2007 22:15
12/09/2007 22:15
|
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 12,295 Sandhurst
Begbie
Ex El Presidente
|
Ex El Presidente
I AM a Coop
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 12,295
Sandhurst
|
If the car hasn't been mapped for it, then dont use it as the ignition advance will be wrong and you can't detect for this, unless you're going to drive around with det cans on too!
But other wise, it would be fine to do as long as the turbo can produce the goods and you can cool the air enough to not run into det problems
Your car is Usain Bolt with wellies
|
|
|
Re: 1.5 bar
[Re: Begbie]
#434043
12/09/2007 22:36
12/09/2007 22:36
|
eldinho
Unregistered
|
eldinho
Unregistered
|
i think aquamist is good to have if you are thinking of running 1.5bar.
|
|
|
Re: 1.5 bar
[Re: ]
#434061
12/09/2007 23:06
12/09/2007 23:06
|
yellow_coop
Unregistered
|
yellow_coop
Unregistered
|
i was running 1.55bar midrange when i got my car mapped at PT but then dropping back to 1.15 at the redline because the std injectors could get enough juice up...
|
|
|
Re: 1.5 bar
[Re: ]
#434094
12/09/2007 23:46
12/09/2007 23:46
|
yogisdk
Unregistered
|
yogisdk
Unregistered
|
I run 1.5 daily with no problems at all, now for 11.000 km
|
|
|
Re: 1.5 bar
[Re: ]
#434095
12/09/2007 23:47
12/09/2007 23:47
|
h2ypr
Unregistered
|
h2ypr
Unregistered
|
See i have plenty of fuel available midrange.... so it wouldnt cause it to run lean.
Ross
|
|
|
Re: 1.5 bar
[Re: ]
#434096
12/09/2007 23:47
12/09/2007 23:47
|
h2ypr
Unregistered
|
h2ypr
Unregistered
|
I run 1.5 daily with no problems at all, now for 11.000 km Stnd internals? Ross
|
|
|
Re: 1.5 bar
[Re: ]
#434097
12/09/2007 23:48
12/09/2007 23:48
|
yogisdk
Unregistered
|
yogisdk
Unregistered
|
Forged pistons... Also a GT2871 RS, I guess smaller turbos would cause too much heat at that range?
|
|
|
Re: 1.5 bar
[Re: ]
#434100
12/09/2007 23:50
12/09/2007 23:50
|
h2ypr
Unregistered
|
h2ypr
Unregistered
|
|
|
|
Re: 1.5 bar
[Re: ]
#434226
13/09/2007 02:54
13/09/2007 02:54
|
Kenno
Unregistered
|
Kenno
Unregistered
|
Ross - GET IT MAPPED! .. else you'll blow it up and we'll all laugh and say we told you so. I can't believe how much your willing to risk given the state of tune/amount of effort put into it.
|
|
|
Re: 1.5 bar
[Re: ]
#434250
13/09/2007 03:12
13/09/2007 03:12
|
h2ypr
Unregistered
|
h2ypr
Unregistered
|
What am i risking? I know my fuelling is spot on and there is no det...
Ross
|
|
|
Re: 1.5 bar
[Re: ]
#434262
13/09/2007 03:22
13/09/2007 03:22
|
Kenno
Unregistered
|
Kenno
Unregistered
|
What happens if it gets warmer? How can you be sure it won't det then?
|
|
|
Re: 1.5 bar
[Re: ]
#434265
13/09/2007 03:24
13/09/2007 03:24
|
h2ypr
Unregistered
|
h2ypr
Unregistered
|
Well why would it? There isnt that much ignition advance and have felt no hesitation. Taking it on the rollers soon to check it.
Ross
|
|
|
Re: 1.5 bar
[Re: ]
#434269
13/09/2007 03:28
13/09/2007 03:28
|
Kenno
Unregistered
|
Kenno
Unregistered
|
why would it det if it's hotter outside? Is that the question?
|
|
|
Re: 1.5 bar
[Re: ]
#434270
13/09/2007 03:31
13/09/2007 03:31
|
h2ypr
Unregistered
|
h2ypr
Unregistered
|
No. Why would it det full stop..? Esp if the fuelling is richer than normal. If a good figure for safety is around 12afr running 11's is gonna be fine.
Ross
|
|
|
Re: 1.5 bar
[Re: ]
#434274
13/09/2007 03:39
13/09/2007 03:39
|
Kenno
Unregistered
|
Kenno
Unregistered
|
Running rich doesn't mean you won't suffer from det. You have to ensure the cylinder temps are sufficently cool.
|
|
|
Re: 1.5 bar
[Re: ]
#434279
13/09/2007 03:45
13/09/2007 03:45
|
h2ypr
Unregistered
|
h2ypr
Unregistered
|
Well extra fuel = extra cooling.
Running mid 10's cool enough?
Ross
|
|
|
Re: 1.5 bar
[Re: ]
#434281
13/09/2007 03:45
13/09/2007 03:45
|
Matty
Unregistered
|
Matty
Unregistered
|
WI maybe
|
|
|
Re: 1.5 bar
[Re: ]
#434283
13/09/2007 03:46
13/09/2007 03:46
|
h2ypr
Unregistered
|
h2ypr
Unregistered
|
Its cheaper to go rsr than that! Ross
|
|
|
Re: 1.5 bar
[Re: ]
#434284
13/09/2007 03:46
13/09/2007 03:46
|
Matty
Unregistered
|
Matty
Unregistered
|
Lol.
|
|
|
Re: 1.5 bar
[Re: ]
#434286
13/09/2007 03:51
13/09/2007 03:51
|
Kenno
Unregistered
|
Kenno
Unregistered
|
too much fuel = bore wash.
|
|
|
Re: 1.5 bar
[Re: ]
#434288
13/09/2007 03:54
13/09/2007 03:54
|
Matty
Unregistered
|
Matty
Unregistered
|
Ross' paranoia now is at a record high Kenno.
|
|
|
Re: 1.5 bar
[Re: ]
#434289
13/09/2007 03:55
13/09/2007 03:55
|
h2ypr
Unregistered
|
h2ypr
Unregistered
|
too much fuel = bore wash. Well too much = borewash Too little = det. So there is a balance to be had which i reckon is around 11's. Ross
|
|
|
Re: 1.5 bar
[Re: ]
#434290
13/09/2007 03:56
13/09/2007 03:56
|
h2ypr
Unregistered
|
h2ypr
Unregistered
|
Ross' paranoia now is at a record high Kenno. Dunno what your so happy about!!! Ross
|
|
|
Re: 1.5 bar
[Re: ]
#434294
13/09/2007 04:03
13/09/2007 04:03
|
Vas
Unregistered
|
Vas
Unregistered
|
Sorry but since there is not (really) a rule of thumb can we argue that: AFR around 11.5-12 and EGT < 900C @ 6K revs, around 1bar MEANS that there is definitely no detonation? On my other car, X3 barge 2.0lt petrol crap/slow engine, I can hear it detting too often for my liking (especially on hot days) to the extend that I send the car back to the garage to get it checked, and they just redownloaded the ECU programme/code whatever. Made fcuk all difference though BUT, I've never heard the 16VT detting. Is it me, or is it simply good anti-det properties/ECU safety sorting it out? I mean could it be detting right now without me hearing it? cheers V.
Last edited by Vas; 13/09/2007 04:04. Reason: boost info added
|
|
|
Re: 1.5 bar
[Re: ]
#434355
13/09/2007 05:47
13/09/2007 05:47
|
Fergie
Unregistered
|
Fergie
Unregistered
|
I run 1.5-1.8 bar full tilt. But then I have loads of fuel and forged rods + pistons.
Standard pistons are as good as that french goal keeper...
|
|
|
Re: 1.5 bar
[Re: ]
#434416
13/09/2007 14:25
13/09/2007 14:25
|
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 12,295 Sandhurst
Begbie
Ex El Presidente
|
Ex El Presidente
I AM a Coop
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 12,295
Sandhurst
|
Ross - GET IT MAPPED! .. else you'll blow it up and we'll all laugh and say we told you so. I can't believe how much your willing to risk given the state of tune/amount of effort put into it. Agreed x 2 Ross, fuelling isn't suffice, you need to know what the ignition advance is too! Why do you think when people mapping cars use det can's if they could soley rely on what the wideband sensor tells then? The more iginiton advance you at higher boost, the more chance of det you have. In general the more boost you run, the less advance you use. If the car / chip hasn't been mapped to run 1.5bar then the ECU will determine what advance to use from certain values, which could be too much and you wont know that, because you are not using det cans. Also det can occur because the timing is ignition is firing before TDC, hence the pinking you can get (same thing, different name) and you can not always hear it either. Ross, please, get the fu*king car mapped and stop pushing the car hard, because it will end in tears
Your car is Usain Bolt with wellies
|
|
|
|