My two pennies:
I've run rolling road radius's too small for cars in the past, and too large. (Actually doing this on the Bravo 1.2, currently).
I can tell you that on paper (or by excel/formula calculation) there may appear to be a lot of differences, but when it comes to actual driving on the wrong size wheels, those differences are barely noticeable.
Years ago, I ran an Uno Turbo, on lower than the correct profile rubber on 13's. Acceleration felt faster, but revs picked up a lot quicker. Fuel economy? Probably worse, but hardly noticeable. Handled well, because of the lower centre of gravity - but this could be equally achieved with shorter stiffer springs.
The Bravo 1.2 I have, is on the old Coupe alloys and tyres, making the rolling radius too big. In theory my speedo should under read. But because of the fair wack of over calibration Fiat dial into their standard speedos, it's actually now far more accurate. Driving the car feels about the same, maybe not quite so fast on acceleration, but on a 1.2 that's not going to be a big difference. Fuel economy? Still about the same, maybe on long motorway journeys at 60mph it's better. But that's not been calculated, and just a guess. That said, I'd have been there with the calculator if I'd noticed a massive loss or improvement in fuel economy. Because there's virtually no difference, I've not bothered checking this.
Certainly, there are issues with clearance if you run massive wheels on a small car. But 19's will clear the back arches on the Coupe, just watch the fronts, as it's limited with the inner plastic arch.
You'll also have to make sure the car is fairly lowered, as the 19's will jack the car up a little.