0 registered members (),
228
guests, and 17
spiders. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums70
Topics113,744
Posts1,340,431
Members1,688
|
Most Online2,346 Apr 14th, 2025
|
|
|
Re: HP rating for Apexi
[Re: Jumeirah]
#664174
16/08/2008 10:10
16/08/2008 10:10
|
peanuthead
Unregistered
|
peanuthead
Unregistered
|
not being funny but i have been in 650bhp skylines running these so shouldn't have to many problems unless you have a 2.4/2.5 conversion and even then i doubt your max it out. by the way its by far the best filter on the market
|
|
|
Re: HP rating for Apexi
[Re: Freddan72]
#664200
16/08/2008 11:00
16/08/2008 11:00
|
peanuthead
Unregistered
|
peanuthead
Unregistered
|
you wont max it out i can tell you that.
|
|
|
Re: HP rating for Apexi
[Re: ]
#664221
16/08/2008 12:30
16/08/2008 12:30
|
TurboJ
Unregistered
|
TurboJ
Unregistered
|
The RamAir JS-108 is what I use and is rated to 400BHP the Apexi is much smaller.
|
|
|
Re: HP rating for Apexi
[Re: ]
#664229
16/08/2008 12:50
16/08/2008 12:50
|
peanuthead
Unregistered
|
peanuthead
Unregistered
|
apexi flows much more than 400bhp and is a much better filter than ramair
|
|
|
Re: HP rating for Apexi
[Re: ]
#664238
16/08/2008 13:12
16/08/2008 13:12
|
TurboJ
Unregistered
|
TurboJ
Unregistered
|
So whats the answer to the question then?
|
|
|
Re: HP rating for Apexi
[Re: ]
#664446
17/08/2008 00:53
17/08/2008 00:53
|
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,897 New Zealand
Saint
My life on the forum
|
My life on the forum
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,897
New Zealand
|
This Apexi pod is commonly used on Evo's running around 400bhp so it should at least support that Although there are different internal sizes - mine is a 80mm funnel This tuner - stage 2 is 400bhp and uses this filter for exampleIf commercial tuners offer this on a 400bhp I would guess more than that, I have seen them often welded into twins on a single big turbo skyline at over 800bhp (T51R Kai) so I say 400bhp+ thats only a guess though
|
|
|
|