Fiat Coupe Forum
- Founded by Kayjey & James Northam
- Funded by the Club for the benefit of all owners
Fiat Coupe Club UK
join the club
Fiat Coupe Forum
 
» Announced
    Posting images


» Related sites
    Main club site
    fiatcoupe.net


» External data
    owners listed
 
Who's Online Now
0 registered members (), 166 guests, and 4 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums70
Topics113,778
Posts1,340,834
Members1,715
Most Online2,346
Apr 14th, 2025
Top Posters(All Time)
barnacle 33,785
stan 32,122
Theresa 23,329
PeteP 21,879
bockers 21,079
JimO 17,917
Edinburgh 17,904
Nigel 17,374
RSS Feeds
Club Events
Club Information
Track Events
Rolling Road/RWYB
Social Events
Non-UK Events
Coupé Related Chat
Coupé Spotting
Coupé News/Press
Buying/Selling Advice
Insuring a Coupé
Basic FAQ's
How to Guides
Forum Issues
Technical Problems
General Maintenance
Styling
Tuning
Handling
ICE and Alarm
Coupés for Sale
Coupés Wanted
Parts for Sale
Parts Wanted
Group Buys
Business Forum
Other Vehicles for Sale/Wanted
Other Items for Sale/Wanted
Haggling/Offers
Ebay links
Other Cars
Other Websites
General Chat
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
2.4 conversion #845444
07/06/2009 18:35
07/06/2009 18:35

T
tony16vt
Unregistered
tony16vt
Unregistered
T



hi, just a quick one does the 2.4 conversion just require a change of crank, thankyou in advance

Re: 2.4 conversion [Re: ] #845455
07/06/2009 19:04
07/06/2009 19:04

T
Trickymex
Unregistered
Trickymex
Unregistered
T



nope, needs unique pistons and rods to make it work

Re: 2.4 conversion [Re: ] #845507
07/06/2009 20:39
07/06/2009 20:39

T
tony16vt
Unregistered
tony16vt
Unregistered
T



where can i get these parts

Re: 2.4 conversion [Re: ] #845550
07/06/2009 21:42
07/06/2009 21:42

R
ra_XOr
Unregistered
ra_XOr
Unregistered
R



i think the 2.4 conversion needs the Stilo crank and con rods.

Re: 2.4 conversion [Re: ] #845579
07/06/2009 22:40
07/06/2009 22:40

T
tony16vt
Unregistered
tony16vt
Unregistered
T



what about pistons

Re: 2.4 conversion [Re: ] #845595
07/06/2009 23:09
07/06/2009 23:09

T
Trickymex
Unregistered
Trickymex
Unregistered
T



the current conversion comprises of a stilo crank in a coupe block with shorter rods and lower compression hight pistons to compensate for the extra stroke that the stilo crank gives

My understanding is that the stilo block cannot be used for 2 reasons, 1. It's not got the stengthning that the coupe block has 2. it's taller and as such the bonnet will not close


It's also worth mentioning that the rod to stroke ratio changes for the worse and because you are trying to cram so much capacity into a short block it limits how low you can go with your compression ratio and to high in my opinion


It's not an easy conversion and involves a lot of for thought and work to make work, there are some compremises in the few 2.4 conversion that I would not be happy with, saying that they seem to work quite well

Re: 2.4 conversion [Re: ] #845659
08/06/2009 07:09
08/06/2009 07:09
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 3,158
Near Reading
JohnS Offline
I need some sleep
JohnS  Offline
I need some sleep

Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 3,158
Near Reading
Tricky,

Most of that is not true!

The stilo block does fit in a coupe with a little playing about. It was thought to not because it was too tall and thus the 20v non-turbo did not get the 2.4 that was available in the Lancia Kappa. However it turns out it does fit.
The block itself is as strong as the coupe block - the main problem is that you have to go 83.5mm and so there is nowhere to go if you damage the block. The block is as strong because it is the same block - there are only two differences - first there is no turbo oil feed (because it has not been drilled or tapped) and secondly it has more material at the top of the stroke (i.e. is taller).

Stilo blocks are very very rare which is more the reason why the coupe block was used.

You can get 8.5:1 in the 20VT block in a 2.4 conversion. Modern ECUs and availability of better fuel mean it is pointless going 8.5:1 in this day and age.

The compromises are mainly that you have to use a bigger turbo and you have to have portwork as otherwise the engine will choke above 5,500-6,000rpm. Therefore there are a lot of additional costs associated with it.


Former low boost hero - 616BHP@1.5 bar. 2.4 20VT RIP
Re: 2.4 conversion [Re: JohnS] #845665
08/06/2009 07:28
08/06/2009 07:28

T
Trickymex
Unregistered
Trickymex
Unregistered
T



With regard to the block I was working with what I had been told rather than what found out my self but thank you for clearing that up for me

I have a couple of points to discuss regarding the 2.4 conversions and would like your input but I'm a bit short on time at the moment so I post up some details later

Re: 2.4 conversion [Re: ] #846088
08/06/2009 18:59
08/06/2009 18:59

T
Taz
Unregistered
Taz
Unregistered
T



oddly enuf its the off boost driveability i love, however my current turbo is just too restricted at higher rpm ( above 4k ) it doesn't like it at present.

I actually went for a very laggy free 0.64 turbine housing, which is just too small, I get ful boost at about 2-2.2k perhaps, no lag as far as i can tell ( maybe Flea can comment more ).

I'm waiting to swap out to a 0.86 turbine housing, coupled with a large MAF housing, I think hopefully this will release a lot more torque & hopefully som more ponies.

I am very conscious that above 400hp, the existing gearboxes will have a short lifespan, so am not prepared to replace boxes like Flea does !! laugh

The real key is to go external wastegate as internally w/g just don't cut it cry


Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.1
(Release build 20190129)
PHP: 7.3.33 Page Time: 0.011s Queries: 14 (0.006s) Memory: 0.7645 MB (Peak: 0.8416 MB) Data Comp: Off Server Time: 2025-06-21 04:59:01 UTC