Fiat Coupe Forum
- Founded by Kayjey & James Northam
- Funded by the Club for the benefit of all owners
Fiat Coupe Club UK
join the club
Fiat Coupe Forum
 
» Announced
    Posting images


» Related sites
    Main club site
    fiatcoupe.net


» External data
    owners listed
 
Who's Online Now
2 registered members (slime500, Coupe682), 227 guests, and 3 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums69
Topics113,599
Posts1,341,093
Members1,801
Most Online731
Jan 14th, 2020
Top Posters(All Time)
barnacle 33,553
stan 32,122
Theresa 23,300
PeteP 21,512
bockers 21,071
JimO 17,917
Nigel 17,367
Edinburgh 16,786
RSS Feeds
Club Events
Club Information
Track Events
Rolling Road/RWYB
Social Events
Non-UK Events
Coupé Related Chat
Coupé Spotting
Coupé News/Press
Buying/Selling Advice
Insuring a Coupé
Basic FAQ's
How to Guides
Forum Issues
Technical Problems
General Maintenance
Styling
Tuning
Handling
ICE and Alarm
Coupés for Sale
Coupés Wanted
Parts for Sale
Parts Wanted
Group Buys
Business Forum
Other Vehicles for Sale/Wanted
Other Items for Sale/Wanted
Haggling/Offers
Ebay links
Other Cars
Other Websites
General Chat
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2
374BHP with 400FT/LB #928471
03/11/2009 02:51
03/11/2009 02:51

T
TurboJ
Unregistered
TurboJ
Unregistered
T



A few tweeks later gives me +50 ft/lb laugh

Upped the boost to 1.7Bar still with an Air temp of 72C shocked

It's a completely different engine now.

Before:
click to enlarge

After:
click to enlarge

Re: 374BHP with 400FT/LB [Re: ] #928493
03/11/2009 09:01
03/11/2009 09:01
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,513
Banbury
stevo Offline
My life on the forum
stevo  Offline
My life on the forum

Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,513
Banbury
so what is the spec and what did you do to get the extra torque?


362bhp of warble

Re: 374BHP with 400FT/LB [Re: stevo] #928562
03/11/2009 11:17
03/11/2009 11:17
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,671
Newport,south wales
B
Benny Offline
My life on the forum
Benny  Offline
My life on the forum
B

Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,671
Newport,south wales
Good result smile

But why are your intake temps still high

Ben

Re: 374BHP with 400FT/LB [Re: stevo] #928564
03/11/2009 11:19
03/11/2009 11:19

T
TurboJ
Unregistered
TurboJ
Unregistered
T



Spec is:
Fully Balanced
Forged Rods
Forged Pistons
Very Light Headwork
Standard Cams
GT2871R 0.64
H&S Downpipe
3" System
630cc @ 3.8Bar
Walbro Fuel Pump
FMIC
SIP with RamAir
OMEX 710 ECU

To get the extra torque, I played with some settings on the boost controller, fixed a slight leak from the exhaust manifold and put a stronger dump valve on. My real problem is the high air temps which I cannot cure as I refuse to cut away my bumper or run water injection. There maybe some more top end power to chase if open up the head further or get some cams but for now I gonna stop fiddling and enjoy.

Re: 374BHP with 400FT/LB [Re: ] #928566
03/11/2009 11:25
03/11/2009 11:25
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,671
Newport,south wales
B
Benny Offline
My life on the forum
Benny  Offline
My life on the forum
B

Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,671
Newport,south wales
Jason, could,nt you just RRd your car with out your front bumper on to see the difference tongue

Ben

Re: 374BHP with 400FT/LB [Re: Benny] #928568
03/11/2009 11:29
03/11/2009 11:29

T
TurboJ
Unregistered
TurboJ
Unregistered
T



Yes that will be my next test, I'm sure it will reduce the temps as very little of my intercooler is in the air stream but even if it does I'm not going to change anything as I want to enjoy my car for a while smile

Re: 374BHP with 400FT/LB [Re: ] #928571
03/11/2009 11:37
03/11/2009 11:37

S
suba
Unregistered
suba
Unregistered
S



72 degrees intake temps!!!!!! I would be very worried about det with them that high when the engine is pushed hard. frown

You are also going to be loosing a great deal of power - you want them to be in the 20's or early 30's.

Re: 374BHP with 400FT/LB [Re: ] #928579
03/11/2009 11:49
03/11/2009 11:49

T
TurboJ
Unregistered
TurboJ
Unregistered
T



It was 72C with an intake of 36C and still 72C with an intake of 25C. Det isn't a problem because when the temps rises the ECU pulls out timing and I loose power frown . I don't really want to run WI but I think I have no choice as I NOT going to cut away my bumper. Squid runs WI for safety (not mapped with the WI) and his temps have dropped to around 28C-36C in the summer.

Re: 374BHP with 400FT/LB [Re: ] #928580
03/11/2009 11:53
03/11/2009 11:53

S
suba
Unregistered
suba
Unregistered
S



I dont see the point in water injection, but dont want to open up a can of worms, as I'm sure that you know the pitfalls and drawbacks of using it.

at least you have the omex to pull back the timing - but it can only pull it back so much!

It's bumper hacking time! laugh

Re: 374BHP with 400FT/LB [Re: ] #928583
03/11/2009 12:02
03/11/2009 12:02

E
eldinho
Unregistered
eldinho
Unregistered
E



I'm not sure on WI either.

Nice torque figure though J. Are you not slightly worried about the box? And when are you getting yourself back to the pod to get that 12 second run?

Re: 374BHP with 400FT/LB [Re: ] #928584
03/11/2009 12:02
03/11/2009 12:02

T
TurboJ
Unregistered
TurboJ
Unregistered
T



The temps will not rise that much that I will run out of timing to pull out, it’s also set to richen up AFR if it goes past a certain point. I am safe from det.

WI isn't that bad it you have an OMEX 710. It links to the ECU and you can setup parameters. For example I can set it so that the WI only activates when the air temps rises above 45C and a boost of 1Bar+ etc. If an error in the WI is detected e.g blockage or out of water it can switch to a different engine map. I'm not a fan of WI either but it’s looking like it might be the only solution for me. NO bumper hacking laugh

I wasn’t going to post this up until the pod on the 1st of Nov but that day was a wash out so now I have to wait till March to set a time frown As for the box, if it breaks it breaks.

Last edited by TurboJ; 03/11/2009 12:06.
Re: 374BHP with 400FT/LB [Re: ] #928585
03/11/2009 12:05
03/11/2009 12:05
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 9,729
Zele, Belgium
Kayjey Offline
Club Member #10
Kayjey  Offline
Club Member #10
Je suis un Coupé

Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 9,729
Zele, Belgium


- Kayjey -

[Linked Image]
[Linked Image]
Re: 374BHP with 400FT/LB [Re: Kayjey] #928586
03/11/2009 12:07
03/11/2009 12:07

T
TurboJ
Unregistered
TurboJ
Unregistered
T



Not a fan of them either. It would be better for me to relocate to Sweden laugh

Re: 374BHP with 400FT/LB [Re: ] #928664
03/11/2009 14:33
03/11/2009 14:33

T
TurboJ
Unregistered
TurboJ
Unregistered
T



Some Vids
I tried to host these in my first post but they went out of sync, you have to download these mp4 to watch. If somebody could host these properly that would be great smile



Hosted on you tube see below, Cheers B

Last edited by TurboJ; 03/11/2009 16:27. Reason: Now Hosted
Re: 374BHP with 400FT/LB [Re: ] #928705
03/11/2009 15:25
03/11/2009 15:25

S
Squid
Unregistered
Squid
Unregistered
S



Hi Jason, interesting figures. What prompted you to go to TOTD again?

Do you fancy popping down to Perfect touch one Saturday to test the figures.

I'm not a great fan of WI, but it does drop the intake temps down by 6-7 degrees instantly, and that was with 100% water. Add 50% Methanol and it should be nearer 10 degrees and reduce chance of knocking.

Re: 374BHP with 400FT/LB [Re: ] #928718
03/11/2009 15:33
03/11/2009 15:33
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 12,294
Sandhurst
Begbie Offline
Ex El Presidente
Begbie  Offline
Ex El Presidente
I AM a Coop

Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 12,294
Sandhurst
Uploaded onto youtube for you

Outside
Inside
Back


Originally Posted by Jonny - After being taken out at Spa
Your car is Usain Bolt with wellies
Re: 374BHP with 400FT/LB [Re: ] #928749
03/11/2009 16:26
03/11/2009 16:26

T
TurboJ
Unregistered
TurboJ
Unregistered
T



Yes we should put ours back 2 back on the Dastek and see what that spits out. Anytime you like Squid.

Re: 374BHP with 400FT/LB [Re: ] #928875
03/11/2009 21:10
03/11/2009 21:10

T
Trickymex
Unregistered
Trickymex
Unregistered
T



Goods results and I love how aggressive the torque curve comes in, it's practically vertical

but you need to do something with the charge temps, maybe some inconspicuous mods to the bumper

it's hiding to true potential of your setup

Re: 374BHP with 400FT/LB [Re: ] #928894
03/11/2009 21:37
03/11/2009 21:37

H
Hani
Unregistered
Hani
Unregistered
H



Nice rsults Jason. Hopefully you'll unleash some more horses out of the engine after you sort/reduce the intake temperatures smile

What intercooler do you have? confused

Re: 374BHP with 400FT/LB [Re: ] #929435
04/11/2009 16:51
04/11/2009 16:51

S
Squid
Unregistered
Squid
Unregistered
S



I really think that you need to add water/methanol injection. It is the quickest and most effective way to reduce charge temps.

Re: 374BHP with 400FT/LB [Re: ] #929711
05/11/2009 00:30
05/11/2009 00:30
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 697
TurboNick Offline
Enjoying the ride
TurboNick  Offline
Enjoying the ride

Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 697
nice results jason. you do realy need to get them temps down but im sure you know what your doing. oh and by the way you've go the title wrong on youtube it says 347bhp when its 374bhp. laugh


Re: 374BHP with 400FT/LB [Re: TurboNick] #929874
05/11/2009 13:16
05/11/2009 13:16

T
TurboJ
Unregistered
TurboJ
Unregistered
T



I losses power through transmission losses via you tube laugh I didn't put the link up frown .

Re: 374BHP with 400FT/LB [Re: ] #934435
14/11/2009 13:14
14/11/2009 13:14

B
beast
Unregistered
beast
Unregistered
B



Originally Posted By: TurboJ
I am safe from det.



no such thing wink

why are dead against using water injection confused

you thought of making up an intercooler water spray system?or a cry02 system?

Re: 374BHP with 400FT/LB [Re: ] #934571
14/11/2009 19:51
14/11/2009 19:51

T
TurboJ
Unregistered
TurboJ
Unregistered
T



Can't use it as the pod or track days. Water injection is hassle and unreliable i'm not dead against it just not a fan.

Re: 374BHP with 400FT/LB [Re: ] #934749
15/11/2009 09:52
15/11/2009 09:52
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 5,405
Castle Combe
Flea Offline
Forum is my life
Flea  Offline
Forum is my life

Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 5,405
Castle Combe
Interesting that both yourself and Squid are making a lot more torque than most similar spec 20v turbos i.e. 40-50lbs/ft. Have you adjusted the inlet cam vernier? What about the cam variator, at what rpm have you set this to switch? You were running 1.7bar before, must be 2bar or more now?

Peak power at 5500rpm is very low for a 2871R too, the power nose dives at 6000rpm, sure you haven't put a turbo diesel in there wink tongue


[Linked Image]

Re: 374BHP with 400FT/LB [Re: Flea] #934810
15/11/2009 13:18
15/11/2009 13:18

M
Marco20valveT
Unregistered
Marco20valveT
Unregistered
M



J haven't you got meth injection?

Re: 374BHP with 400FT/LB [Re: Flea] #934984
15/11/2009 20:50
15/11/2009 20:50

T
TurboJ
Unregistered
TurboJ
Unregistered
T



Originally Posted By: Flea
Interesting that both yourself and Squid are making a lot more torque than most similar spec 20v turbos i.e. 40-50lbs/ft.


I could say the same about your recent string of cars being 30-50BHP more than the norm & over the compressor maps rated by Garrett. I prefer more torque as that’s the rpm range I drive in. How often do you drive above 5500?

I'm not sure as to why mine nose dives at 5500 rpm I should investigate it but at the moment I’m loving the torque and its getting even more stronger with the winter coming laugh

I used to run 1.8Hold & 2Bar overboost with PT map but since I switched to the Omex and changed some of the engine spec I run 1.7Bar, Squid runs 2Bar. His BHP is 415 as it don't nose dive, guess the 0.86 helps up there.

I have a water injection system but the pump knackered over two years ago and haven't touched it since.

Re: 374BHP with 400FT/LB [Re: ] #935068
15/11/2009 23:05
15/11/2009 23:05
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 5,405
Castle Combe
Flea Offline
Forum is my life
Flea  Offline
Forum is my life

Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 5,405
Castle Combe
I just wondered if you had done anything mechanically to achieve this.


[Linked Image]

Re: 374BHP with 400FT/LB [Re: Flea] #935093
16/11/2009 00:27
16/11/2009 00:27

T
TurboJ
Unregistered
TurboJ
Unregistered
T



Not really I just built mine up to how I felt was best. What about you, have you done anything extra electronically to achieve your gains?

Re: 374BHP with 400FT/LB [Re: ] #935139
16/11/2009 09:57
16/11/2009 09:57

E
eldinho
Unregistered
eldinho
Unregistered
E



Originally Posted By: TurboJ
How often do you drive above 5500?


Lots laugh

I'm at the opposite end of the scale, I quite like my power at the top end. When I'm driving normally I don't want a big thump of power. If I want to drive fast I shift down and drive accordingly.

Page 1 of 2 1 2

Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.1
(Release build 20190129)
PHP: 7.3.33 Page Time: 0.059s Queries: 15 (0.005s) Memory: 0.8643 MB (Peak: 1.0743 MB) Data Comp: Off Server Time: 2024-04-28 07:36:59 UTC