|
0 registered members (),
1,522
guests, and 3
spiders. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Forums48
Topics103,747
Posts1,170,395
Members1,671
| |
Most Online39,516 Apr 15th, 2026
|
|
|
Re: AEM Wideband lambda
[Re: Ecrab]
#988208
22/02/2010 08:23
22/02/2010 08:23
|
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 8,935 Lightwater, Surrey
DaveG
Club Treasurer Member 311
|
Club Treasurer Member 311
Je suis un Coupé
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 8,935
Lightwater, Surrey
|
Why behind the cat? On the Hayward & Scott 3" downpipe I have, the lambda boss is just before the flange that joins to the cat, the ideal location IMHO.
1996 Portofino 20vt & 2000 Pearl White Plus 2008 Ferrari F430 & 2017 Fiat 124 Spider
|
|
|
Re: AEM Wideband lambda
[Re: Ecrab]
#988217
22/02/2010 08:51
22/02/2010 08:51
|
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 17,387 Staffordshire
Nigel
Forum veteran
|
Forum veteran
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 17,387
Staffordshire
|
As long as its behind the cat it should be OK I think you mean in FRONT of the cat (ie the exhaust gasses hit the sensor before they hit the cat)
|
|
|
Re: AEM Wideband lambda
[Re: kj16v]
#988247
22/02/2010 10:02
22/02/2010 10:02
|
Coupe_Don
Unregistered
|
Coupe_Don
Unregistered
|
I got mine roughly 3 quarters down the side of the downpipe just before the cat. Its slightly slanted, 10deg gradient or something which as above helps reduce moisture/condensation build up.
|
|
|
Re: AEM Wideband lambda
[Re: ]
#988300
22/02/2010 11:27
22/02/2010 11:27
|
TurboJ
Unregistered
|
TurboJ
Unregistered
|
Just remove the std narrow band and fit the wideband in its place. Use the controller to emulate a narrowband signal and wire that to the ECU and the wideband signal to the wideband gauge. One sensor doing two jobs  . You can put it close to the turbo to get better AFR readings but you must use a lambda heatsink or it will die very quickly. http://www.innovatemotorsports.com/xcart/product.php?productid=16148&cat=250&page=1
|
|
|
Re: AEM Wideband lambda
[Re: bojke]
#988476
22/02/2010 15:49
22/02/2010 15:49
|
TurboJ
Unregistered
|
TurboJ
Unregistered
|
|
|
|
Re: AEM Wideband lambda
[Re: ]
#988535
22/02/2010 16:49
22/02/2010 16:49
|
sterrick
Unregistered
|
sterrick
Unregistered
|
iv got mine fitted on the exhaust behind the visco. can see it if you look down the back of the engine, good position so you can have it at a decent angle to keep condensation out.
|
|
|
Re: AEM Wideband lambda
[Re: Nigel]
#988599
22/02/2010 18:05
22/02/2010 18:05
|
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 684 Derby
Ecrab
Enjoying the ride
|
Enjoying the ride
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 684
Derby
|
As long as its behind the cat it should be OK I think you mean in FRONT of the cat (ie the exhaust gasses hit the sensor before they hit the cat) Yes I wasn't thinking correctly
|
|
|
Re: AEM Wideband lambda
[Re: bojke]
#988797
22/02/2010 23:07
22/02/2010 23:07
|
TurboJ
Unregistered
|
TurboJ
Unregistered
|
Anywhere between 10 oclock and 2 oclock.
|
|
|
Re: AEM Wideband lambda
[Re: ]
#988822
23/02/2010 00:37
23/02/2010 00:37
|
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 8,935 Lightwater, Surrey
DaveG
Club Treasurer Member 311
|
Club Treasurer Member 311
Je suis un Coupé
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 8,935
Lightwater, Surrey
|
Shame that H&S put it in at 3 o'clock but I've not seen any problems so far. What is the "heatsink" you are referring to TJ?
1996 Portofino 20vt & 2000 Pearl White Plus 2008 Ferrari F430 & 2017 Fiat 124 Spider
|
|
|
Re: AEM Wideband lambda
[Re: DaveG]
#988840
23/02/2010 06:58
23/02/2010 06:58
|
Hani
Unregistered
|
Hani
Unregistered
|
Here are couple of pictures of my wideband sensor I feel that it should be tilted up a little bit (pointing at 2 o'clock) as per AEM datasheet. I have the H&S downpipe by the way. Readings are fine (I think). I'm taking the car to the dyno soon and will compare readings from the gauge with the dyno readings (although readings are taken from different locations).
|
|
|
Re: AEM Wideband lambda
[Re: DaveG]
#988858
23/02/2010 08:48
23/02/2010 08:48
|
TurboJ
Unregistered
|
TurboJ
Unregistered
|
3 o’clock and 9 are just ok too but is better to get a slight angle if you can.
The heat sink means that you can put the lambda closer to the turbo. Lambda can’t take continuous heat above 850C for long so they damage, using the heat sink ensures they are kept cool but still able to perform.
|
|
|
Re: AEM Wideband lambda
[Re: DaveG]
#988863
23/02/2010 09:03
23/02/2010 09:03
|
Steve_G
Unregistered
|
Steve_G
Unregistered
|
|
|
|
Re: AEM Wideband lambda
[Re: ]
#988933
23/02/2010 11:15
23/02/2010 11:15
|
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 8,935 Lightwater, Surrey
DaveG
Club Treasurer Member 311
|
Club Treasurer Member 311
Je suis un Coupé
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 8,935
Lightwater, Surrey
|
89 bucks  I don't think that the lambda probe would fit on my H&S downpipe with that heatsink, the location is much closer to the oil cooler pipes and it was hard enough to fir the OE lambda probe. But you might be OK with standard turbo and downpipe.
1996 Portofino 20vt & 2000 Pearl White Plus 2008 Ferrari F430 & 2017 Fiat 124 Spider
|
|
|
Re: AEM Wideband lambda
[Re: DaveG]
#989066
23/02/2010 14:50
23/02/2010 14:50
|
Steve_G
Unregistered
|
Steve_G
Unregistered
|
I know you want to see it i'd stuggle to to justify a tenner for it.
And it is quite long so fitment may be an issue.
The problem is they aren't as durable as the narrow bands.
Steve
|
|
|
Re: AEM Wideband lambda
[Re: ]
#989654
24/02/2010 13:18
24/02/2010 13:18
|
Kenno
Unregistered
|
Kenno
Unregistered
|
It’s up to you but the closer you put your sensor to the process the accurate the AFR readings. Really? I thought the point of putting it further from the turbo is to ensure the exhaust gases have had enough time to give a consistent mixture?
|
|
|
Re: AEM Wideband lambda
[Re: Rog20VT]
#989660
24/02/2010 13:32
24/02/2010 13:32
|
chr77176
Unregistered
|
chr77176
Unregistered
|
on my AEM manual:
"Mount the O2 sensor in the exhaust system at leas 18 inches downstream from the exhaust port. If you anticipe high EGT's (over 800°c), run a turbocharger , run at high rpm for extended periods , then you must mount the sensor at least 36 inches or more downstream of the exhaust port as all of these can cause the sensor to overheat. For accurate readings, the sensor must be mounted before catalytic converters.To prevent collection of liquids between the sensor housing and sensor element during the cold start phase, the installation angle shoukd be inclined at least 10° from horizontal with the electrical connection upwards..."
Last edited by chr77176; 24/02/2010 13:33.
|
|
|
Re: AEM Wideband lambda
[Re: ]
#989690
24/02/2010 15:20
24/02/2010 15:20
|
TurboJ
Unregistered
|
TurboJ
Unregistered
|
Really? I thought the point of putting it further from the turbo is to ensure the exhaust gases have had enough time to give a consistent mixture?
Once the gasses come out of the cylinder that was your AFR. You should always try and put any feedback sensor for a closed loop control system as close to the process as possible, otherwise you will incur a transport delay. Look at where Fiat put the OE sensor it is about 2" away from the turbo. The only difference is that a wideband is more sensitive to heat so a heatsink should be used.
|
|
|
Re: AEM Wideband lambda
[Re: ]
#989696
24/02/2010 15:47
24/02/2010 15:47
|
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 10,747 N.E Scotland
mattB
Club member 6
|
Club member 6
I AM a Coop
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 10,747
N.E Scotland
|
I dont think many people will be running a wideband as part of a closed loop system.
Death-rattle-tastic
|
|
|
Re: AEM Wideband lambda
[Re: mattB]
#989719
24/02/2010 16:56
24/02/2010 16:56
|
TurboJ
Unregistered
|
TurboJ
Unregistered
|
True but my point was to remove the OE sensor and put in the wideband with heatsink and use the wideband to emulate the narrow band to the ECU and the wideband to the gauge, that way you get better readings and don't have to make a new hole. And you use one sensor to do two jobs.
|
|
|
Re: AEM Wideband lambda
[Re: Nigel]
#989841
24/02/2010 20:37
24/02/2010 20:37
|
TurboJ
Unregistered
|
TurboJ
Unregistered
|
Not at idle for those with 3" + bore size 
|
|
|
|