|
3 registered members (TonyB, G_Man, carmine),
610
guests, and 3
spiders. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Forums48
Topics103,725
Posts1,170,163
Members1,666
| |
Most Online39,516
Apr 16th, 2026
|
|
|
Re: Hankook Ventus Prime K105 205/55-16, opinions?
[Re: Rask]
#1028013
28/04/2010 17:53
28/04/2010 17:53
|
anthrax
Unregistered
|
anthrax
Unregistered
|
Got Pirelli P-Zeros but need to replace my rear tires with some new ones. My tire guy recommended the Ventus Primes, saying they would be a good match for my P-zeros.
I've seen some other Hankooks as well, some of you run the R-S2 and there are some other models around. Got good opinions regarding what to pick?
Also, shold I switch to 225s instead? In that case, should I switch to 45s or keep 50 profile. I've got the LE wheels by the way... Pirelli is premium brand Hankook is budget brand , but quality budget like Falken , Maxxis etc Hankook rs-2 is track day road legal tyre , so if you do 15-25000 miles per year it wont suit you. Regarding profile - 45's make your ride a bit firmer and car will coner a little bit better.
|
|
|
Re: Hankook Ventus Prime K105 205/55-16, opinions?
[Re: ]
#1028306
29/04/2010 10:33
29/04/2010 10:33
|
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 397
Sweden
Rask
OP
Making a profit
|
OP
Making a profit
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 397
Sweden
|
Ok, it seems either the Ventus Primes (205/50R-16) or Ventus V12 evo (225/50R-16) are my best choices for good traction in wet AND dry since the S1 and the S2:s are more geared dry weather traction.
Any experiences regarding any of these on the QP? Or do you have better suggestions?
Last edited by Rask; 29/04/2010 10:40.
|
|
|
Re: Hankook Ventus Prime K105 205/55-16, opinions?
[Re: Rask]
#1028609
29/04/2010 20:43
29/04/2010 20:43
|
Per
Unregistered
|
Per
Unregistered
|
Rasken, don't buy 225/50-16 as I think they may catch the innerliners..
I think std 225/45-16 is better.
|
|
|
|
