|
|
|
2 registered members (Edinburgh, markopolo),
1,283
guests, and 4
spiders. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Forums48
Topics103,726
Posts1,170,177
Members1,666
| |
Most Online39,516 Apr 16th, 2026
|
|
|
Re: FMIC
#121136
26/05/2006 08:09
26/05/2006 08:09
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
|
|
|
Re: FMIC
#121137
26/05/2006 08:53
26/05/2006 08:53
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
It seems that they even increase it <img src="/forum/images/graemlins/frown.gif" alt="" /> Is this right?
|
|
|
Re: FMIC
#121139
26/05/2006 14:51
26/05/2006 14:51
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
A good FMIC won't increase lag - i.e the Pro Alloy one or an Evo one. The PACE FMIC will increase lag as its a double pass system - i.e the air goes into and comes out of the same side of the intercooler. Don't get one of these !
Get a straight induction mod if you want to decrease lag - excellent mod.
|
|
|
Re: FMIC
#121140
27/05/2006 22:18
27/05/2006 22:18
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Hi Jayell,
I've seen many using them (straight induction) and I've seen the pipe already, but how exactly the pipe reduces turbo lag <img src="/forum/images/graemlins/confused.gif" alt="" />
And where does it sits?
|
|
|
Re: FMIC
#121141
27/05/2006 22:54
27/05/2006 22:54
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
You're asking the wrong person mate - rather like women, I know what they look like and how much they cost but have absolutely no idea how they work <img src="/forum/images/graemlins/wink.gif" alt="" /> Look here - the left side connects straight to the turbo inlet, the air filter sits very low in the engine bay where the standard sidemount intercooler used to sit, getting a good cold air feed.
|
|
|
Re: FMIC
#121142
27/05/2006 23:50
27/05/2006 23:50
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
ok!
and those from torque italia? they seem very diferent from the one on the photo <img src="/forum/images/graemlins/confused.gif" alt="" />
|
|
|
Re: FMIC
#121143
28/05/2006 11:31
28/05/2006 11:31
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Yep, not only from Torque Italia, but hand delivered by Barbz himself when he was here on holiday last Xmas <img src="/forum/images/graemlins/laugh.gif" alt="" />
|
|
|
Re: FMIC
#121144
28/05/2006 17:03
28/05/2006 17:03
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
The straight induction pipe reduces lag by enabling the turbo to spool up more easily. The shorter length of induction pipework causes less of a restriction to air entering the turbo.
A restrictive intercooler like the Pace FMIC causes more lag but because the turbo has more difficulty forcing air through it and hence wont spool up as quick. The more restrictive the intercooler is, the more pressure is lost across it meaning less boost pressure at your inlet manifold.
Last edited by cosmograph; 28/05/2006 17:03.
|
|
|
Re: FMIC
#121145
28/05/2006 19:24
28/05/2006 19:24
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
thanks cosmo
But wont a less restrictive pipe and filter be a contribution to engine wear?
|
|
|
Re: FMIC
#121146
28/05/2006 20:07
28/05/2006 20:07
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Only in the way that using more power more often does <img src="/forum/images/graemlins/laugh.gif" alt="" /> (assuming that the filter does filter).
|
|
|
Re: FMIC
#121147
28/05/2006 20:25
28/05/2006 20:25
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Yes! that's a point. But it would be great if we could raise hp without engine wear <img src="/forum/images/graemlins/smile.gif" alt="" />
And we can agree that a fmic does just that since the temps are lower and the flow is higher.
That's not the case of a less restrictive air filter that supposedly permits bigger particles to enter the engine. And I'm imagining that with the fact that the pipe is conected directly to the turbo manifold so I'm a bit concerned with that <img src="/forum/images/graemlins/crazy.gif" alt="" />
|
|
|
|
|
|
|