Fiat Coupe Forum
- Funded by the Club for the benefit of all owners
- Please consider joining the Club to help keep the Forum running
- Or you can choose to make a Donation
Fiat Coupe Club UK
join the club
Fiat Coupe Forum
 
» Announced
    Posting images


» Related sites
    Main club site
    fiatcoupe.net

 
Who's Online Now
0 registered members (), 538 guests, and 4 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums48
Topics103,722
Posts1,170,108
Members1,659
Most Online39,516
Apr 16th, 2026
Top Posters(All Time)
barnacle 33,794
stan 32,123
Theresa 23,347
PeteP 22,309
bockers 21,083
Edinburgh 18,904
JimO 17,919
Nigel 17,386
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
2.4 turbo conversion?? #1383015
06/10/2012 16:41
06/10/2012 16:41
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 20
Antwerp, Belgium
B
Bart Offline OP
Newbie
Bart  Offline OP
Newbie
B

Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 20
Antwerp, Belgium
Dear COUPE-lovers.
I live in Belgium and i'm running a green 20VT coupe for almost 6 years. After a year the turbo was used and i replaced it with a GT2860RS and made a FMIC conversion and an APEXI boost controller. I always ran it with 1,2 bar boost.Performance was great and i never had any problems with it.I have now 183000km on the tacho.
But now comes the problem: it seems like the engine consumed a lot of oil in the last 1000km and i broke the engine. °((the conrod of cil 1 and the main bearings next to cil.1),and the piston has touched the cyl.head slightly.
Is it possible to use a 2.4 STILO-engineblock ?
I know it doesn't have the oil feed for the turbo, but this can be solved. My only concern is the height of the block.
I found someone who has a forged stilo block modified for turbo conversion, and it's tempting to buy it.
Can i use this block together with my original cylinder head? And what gasket do i need,cause it looks like the cooling jackets are a bit different around the cylinders.
I'm not interested to get more than 350 hp. But i want to have it more driveable in the low revs.I really love this car and it's always giving me a smile on my face when i throttle it.I hope there are some people who can help me with this.I see a lot of 2.4 conversions on the original 2.0 block, but never on the original Stilo-block.
Greets

Re: 2.4 turbo conversion?? [Re: Bart] #1383060
06/10/2012 21:00
06/10/2012 21:00

M
Marco20ValveT
Unregistered
Marco20ValveT
Unregistered
M



Hello Bart!

I don't know too much about the stilo block but I will try to help.

You can use the stilo block and plumb an oil way for the turbo.
It will fit fine and I *think* you can use the coupe head.

But to be on the safe side, I would say use the the silo head and new vales to deal with te heat ect I.e sodium valves or better.

If you hit want 350bhp, then you may be better off staying with the 2L engine.

I know that all the 2.4 and 2.5L coupes use the stilo block so it's not a problem!!

Marco

Re: 2.4 turbo conversion?? [Re: ] #1383067
06/10/2012 21:23
06/10/2012 21:23

D
doug20vt
Unregistered
doug20vt
Unregistered
D



pretty sure its not the stilo block that is used marco, is it not just the crank but custom rods and pistons but in the original 20vt block

the best person to speak to about these conversions is Barbz or John_S

give one of these guys a pm Bart, not sure if John_S is still on the forum so i would pm Barbz as he is the pioneer of these

good luck, be good to see another 2.4 and i did consider doing this conversion with the gt28rs turbo as i love low and mid range torque

cheers

Re: 2.4 turbo conversion?? [Re: ] #1383079
06/10/2012 22:10
06/10/2012 22:10
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 19,947
North wales
pinin_prestatyn Offline
Forum veteran
pinin_prestatyn  Offline
Forum veteran

Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 19,947
North wales
You know the first words you'd mutter after flooring it in a 2.4? Cowabunga!



Coopless!
Re: 2.4 turbo conversion?? [Re: Bart] #1383349
08/10/2012 10:22
08/10/2012 10:22

N
nyssa7
Unregistered
nyssa7
Unregistered
N



Mine is running standard 20vt 2.0 block, Stilo Abarth 2.4 crank along with custom rods and pistons

Re: 2.4 turbo conversion?? [Re: Bart] #1383524
08/10/2012 20:37
08/10/2012 20:37
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 20
Antwerp, Belgium
B
Bart Offline OP
Newbie
Bart  Offline OP
Newbie
B

Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 20
Antwerp, Belgium
Thanks for the answers
It seems like the STILO block is 7mm higher than the 2.0.
So maybe i will have to reweld the downpipe slightly.
Are the crankshafts still original(concerning hardness)that you use on your 2.4 conversions?
greets

Re: 2.4 turbo conversion?? [Re: Bart] #1383566
08/10/2012 22:19
08/10/2012 22:19

J
johnnybravoturbo
Unregistered
johnnybravoturbo
Unregistered
J



Someone I know is using a stilo block.
Don't you lot read Autoitalia laugh

Lots of alterations required to oil ways,brackets exhaust etc etc etc.
Also the compression ratios are different as are the squish angle and volume.

And that's not half the issues you'll face so unless your experienced or buy the platform from someone whose used this engine before then stick with the 2.0.

John.s ran a 2.0 and mavric ran a 2.0 with a 2.4 crank with custom pistons and rods.

Only people to use stilo engine is me and Barbz.
That said Barbz has got some secret project in the pipeline so not sure if that involves a further transplant.

Re: 2.4 turbo conversion?? [Re: Bart] #1383629
09/10/2012 07:49
09/10/2012 07:49
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 288
Germany
Stichl Offline
Making a profit
Stichl  Offline
Making a profit

Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 288
Germany
I am using a stilo block as well - the only advantage beyond the 2l-block is this 7mm more height. Therefore you can use longer, means stronger pistons.
This becomes relevant from engine power about 600HP...
Juergen


20VT coupegrale 4x4
Re: 2.4 turbo conversion?? [Re: Bart] #1383634
09/10/2012 08:18
09/10/2012 08:18
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 20
Antwerp, Belgium
B
Bart Offline OP
Newbie
Bart  Offline OP
Newbie
B

Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 20
Antwerp, Belgium
Ok thanks ,so there are still a lot of issues to solve before using this block.

Re: 2.4 turbo conversion?? [Re: Stichl] #1383637
09/10/2012 08:46
09/10/2012 08:46

B
Biggenz
Unregistered
Biggenz
Unregistered
B



Originally Posted by Stichl
This becomes relevant from engine power about 600HP...
Juergen


Not necessarily. Strokers can never rev is well as short stroke engines, and some turbos need to be revved to make the power.

Compare my car(2.0) to Barbz's(2.4). After 7000rpm his power starts to tail off where as mine goes right up to the 8250rpm limit and is still climbing. Totally depends what setup you're going for.

Re: 2.4 turbo conversion?? [Re: ] #1383667
09/10/2012 11:06
09/10/2012 11:06
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 288
Germany
Stichl Offline
Making a profit
Stichl  Offline
Making a profit

Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 288
Germany
Originally Posted by Biggenz
Originally Posted by Stichl
This becomes relevant from engine power about 600HP...
Juergen


Not necessarily. Strokers can never rev is well as short stroke engines, and some turbos need to be revved to make the power.

Compare my car(2.0) to Barbz's(2.4). After 7000rpm his power starts to tail off where as mine goes right up to the 8250rpm limit and is still climbing. Totally depends what setup you're going for.


A big turbo will need more energy from the exhaust than a smaller unit. Therefore a bigger engine like 2,4l, which will deliver more exhaust in lower revs, will improve start up behaviour of these big turbos.
A short stroker will need more speed to get the same amount of exhaust like the 2,4l. Moreover the 2,4l has better geometric characteristics - a longer lever - which will affect in a better response in lower revs as well.
Disadvantage of a long-stroke 2,4l: at high revs your engine has not enough time to fill the big looong pots with enough air, any more. Now the cylinder charge becomes worse in direct comparison with a shorter 2l.
Therefore it is very very important for a long strok engine to have a very efficient cylinder head - still more than for a short 2l.
For example - the 16V Turbo engine has about the same stroke like the 2,4l engine - about 90mm.
And there are a lot of 16V Turbo engines, which rev about 8000rpm or even more.
8250rpm with hydraulic valve lifters is an absurdity anyway. Do you have a mod to meachanical valve lift?!
I modified my hydraulic valve lifters to get more revs out of it... we will see, what they can do - with 2,4l.
Back to the pistons - the 2,4l pistons become very short in a 2l block - therefore they won't do the torque which is needed to get >600HP. Thus you will need 560NM to get 600HP with 7500rpm... Very very much, maybe too much for a short 2,4l piston for 2l block. The additional 7mm from the higher Stilo block may help here to get a stronger piston design!
Juergen



20VT coupegrale 4x4
Re: 2.4 turbo conversion?? [Re: ] #1383713
09/10/2012 15:30
09/10/2012 15:30

N
nyssa7
Unregistered
nyssa7
Unregistered
N



Originally Posted by Biggenz
Compare my car(2.0) to Barbz's(2.4). After 7000rpm his power starts to tail off where as mine goes right up to the 8250rpm limit and is still climbing. Totally depends what setup you're going for.

isnt that the whole point - who can rev their car like that on the road? And having had race engines in my kappa, one like yours with power still climbing at 8000, and another built as a torque monster, I know which is quicker on track too

Hence the building of a 2.4 set for low pickup over high revs, but with solid lifter conversion in case I need to rev out rather than change gear

Re: 2.4 turbo conversion?? [Re: ] #1383716
09/10/2012 15:42
09/10/2012 15:42

B
Biggenz
Unregistered
Biggenz
Unregistered
B



Originally Posted by nyssa7
who can rev their car like that on the road?


Me. smile

Re: 2.4 turbo conversion?? [Re: ] #1383721
09/10/2012 16:01
09/10/2012 16:01
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 12,312
Sandhurst
Begbie Offline
ex El Presidente
Begbie  Offline
ex El Presidente
I AM a Coop

Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 12,312
Sandhurst
Originally Posted by nyssa7
Originally Posted by Biggenz
Compare my car(2.0) to Barbz's(2.4). After 7000rpm his power starts to tail off where as mine goes right up to the 8250rpm limit and is still climbing. Totally depends what setup you're going for.

isnt that the whole point - who can rev their car like that on the road? And having had race engines in my kappa, one like yours with power still climbing at 8000, and another built as a torque monster, I know which is quicker on track too

Hence the building of a 2.4 set for low pickup over high revs, but with solid lifter conversion in case I need to rev out rather than change gear

Is it finished yet? hehe


Originally Posted by Jonny - After being taken out at Spa
Your car is Usain Bolt with wellies
Re: 2.4 turbo conversion?? [Re: Bart] #1383843
09/10/2012 23:03
09/10/2012 23:03
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 9,737
Zele, Belgium
Kayjey Offline
Club Member #10
Kayjey  Offline
Club Member #10
Je suis un Coupé

Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 9,737
Zele, Belgium
Bart, would be nice to meet up one day! You're pretty close.


- Kayjey -

[Linked Image]
[Linked Image]
Re: 2.4 turbo conversion?? [Re: Bart] #1383891
10/10/2012 08:13
10/10/2012 08:13
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 20
Antwerp, Belgium
B
Bart Offline OP
Newbie
Bart  Offline OP
Newbie
B

Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 20
Antwerp, Belgium
Yes ,it looks to be pretty close.
Do you have experience with these engines?
Maybe we can meet.

Re: 2.4 turbo conversion?? [Re: Begbie] #1383896
10/10/2012 08:30
10/10/2012 08:30

N
nyssa7
Unregistered
nyssa7
Unregistered
N



Originally Posted by Begbie

Is it finished yet? hehe


Alas the legal issues drag on - I'll PM you


Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.1
(Release build 20190129)
PHP: 7.4.33 Page Time: 0.015s Queries: 14 (0.010s) Memory: 0.6671 MB (Peak: 0.8026 MB) Data Comp: Off Server Time: 2026-10-10 04:49:57 UTC