|
1 registered members (1 invisible),
927
guests, and 5
spiders. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Forums48
Topics103,726
Posts1,170,181
Members1,666
| |
Most Online39,516 Apr 16th, 2026
|
|
|
Re: Moving the AFM
[Re: Genic]
#457257
15/10/2007 03:16
15/10/2007 03:16
|
karlothen
Unregistered
|
karlothen
Unregistered
|
it will need to remain on the atmospheric (pre turbo) side mate. you can move it but make sure all hoses to and from are of equal diameter and have no step up's or reducers, just my 2p
|
|
|
Re: Moving the AFM
[Re: Genic]
#457288
15/10/2007 03:30
15/10/2007 03:30
|
h2ypr
Unregistered
|
h2ypr
Unregistered
|
The afm is part of the fuel calculation at the ecu i believe, so moving it further away from the air intake would cause it to react slower to changes maybe?
Ross
|
|
|
Re: Moving the AFM
[Re: Genic]
#457321
15/10/2007 03:48
15/10/2007 03:48
|
h2ypr
Unregistered
|
h2ypr
Unregistered
|
Ross was hoping that the mapping would correct it. It would on boost. The ecu still controls it off boost, so would be a tad lumpy on/off throttle. Ross
|
|
|
Re: Moving the AFM
[Re: ]
#457323
15/10/2007 03:51
15/10/2007 03:51
|
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,618 Oswestry
Genic
OP
My life on the forum
|
OP
My life on the forum
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,618
Oswestry
|
I dont think I have heard of people with SIP's complaing of rough idle's ???
EDIT. the lambda sensor would control the idle as well.
Last edited by Genic; 15/10/2007 03:52.
|
|
|
Re: Moving the AFM
[Re: Genic]
#457324
15/10/2007 03:51
15/10/2007 03:51
|
karlothen
Unregistered
|
karlothen
Unregistered
|
DAMN ! ah well cheers mate , as for the reducers/steppers I do use thoes to fit my SIP its unavoidable. fair enough, i suppose with a reducer, the air flow volume is the same, it's just flowing at a faster rate at that given point
|
|
|
Re: Moving the AFM
[Re: Genic]
#457337
15/10/2007 03:56
15/10/2007 03:56
|
h2ypr
Unregistered
|
h2ypr
Unregistered
|
I dont think I have heard of people with SIP's complaing of rough idle's ???
EDIT. the lambda sensor would control the idle as well. SIP is the one of the causes for concern with idling woes. Ross
|
|
|
Re: Moving the AFM
[Re: benje]
#457345
15/10/2007 03:59
15/10/2007 03:59
|
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 1,855 Birmingham
benje
My life on the forum
|
My life on the forum
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 1,855
Birmingham
|
Actually ignore the hot air being passed over it, just realised they are hot wire devices on 20VT, so heat the air up any way.
Anyone anygood with physics? As Karlothen says, if you are using a reducer, then are you increasing the gas speed over the element? Therefore cooling it faster, inturn making the ECU believe there is more air than there is, making the whole thing run rich?
Ben
Ignore all that, as the air flow meter doesnt change size. I am, as usual, talking crap.
Last edited by benje2; 15/10/2007 04:05.
|
|
|
Re: Moving the AFM
[Re: benje]
#457354
15/10/2007 04:07
15/10/2007 04:07
|
karlothen
Unregistered
|
karlothen
Unregistered
|
the only reason i'm not to sure about moving the unit "post turbo" is because i have no idea what the max air flow rate the meter can read, obviously the unit is built to meet certain limits within it's day to day life, i'm really not to sure if it could cope on a day to day basis with sampling upto xxx times the standard flow rate? add in the fact that you will eventualy get some oil blow by from the turbo seals and the fact that the crank case breather will be venting oil vapour pre turbo..... i'm pretty sure the meter will get messy pretty quickly. ok you can remove the crank case breather, but i'm still not sure about having a sensitive meter post turbo. just my 2p karl 
|
|
|
Re: Moving the AFM
[Re: Genic]
#457364
15/10/2007 04:14
15/10/2007 04:14
|
h2ypr
Unregistered
|
h2ypr
Unregistered
|
Karl , the air flow would be the same before and after the turbo, just one is sucking and the other is blowing?? Yeah one side is pressurized the other isnt as much so. Ross
|
|
|
Re: Moving the AFM
[Re: ]
#457370
15/10/2007 04:18
15/10/2007 04:18
|
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 1,855 Birmingham
benje
My life on the forum
|
My life on the forum
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 1,855
Birmingham
|
Karl , the air flow would be the same before and after the turbo, just one is sucking and the other is blowing?? Yeah one side is pressurized the other isnt as much so. Ross Ahhhhh, but surely, if you have for example, 1.2 bar boost on one side, there must be 1.2 bar of vacuum on the other side? Ben (Where are all the physicists when you need em?)
|
|
|
Re: Moving the AFM
[Re: benje]
#457372
15/10/2007 04:21
15/10/2007 04:21
|
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,618 Oswestry
Genic
OP
My life on the forum
|
OP
My life on the forum
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,618
Oswestry
|
Karl , the air flow would be the same before and after the turbo, just one is sucking and the other is blowing?? Yeah one side is pressurized the other isnt as much so. Ross Ahhhhh, but surely, if you have for example, 1.2 bar boost on one side, there must be 1.2 bar of vacuum on the other side? Ben (Where are all the physicists when you need em?) Not quite I think, there would be more pressure pushing the air into the engine, than sucking it through the filter
|
|
|
Re: Moving the AFM
[Re: benje]
#457373
15/10/2007 04:22
15/10/2007 04:22
|
karlothen
Unregistered
|
karlothen
Unregistered
|
Karl , the air flow would be the same before and after the turbo, just one is sucking and the other is blowing?? Yeah one side is pressurized the other isnt as much so. Ross Ahhhhh, but surely, if you have for example, 1.2 bar boost on one side, there must be 1.2 bar of vacuum on the other side? Ben (Where are all the physicists when you need em?) ahhh, good point  i'll use the girl friend nagging me to get off the computer for my lapse in concentration 
|
|
|
Re: Moving the AFM
[Re: Genic]
#457378
15/10/2007 04:24
15/10/2007 04:24
|
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 1,855 Birmingham
benje
My life on the forum
|
My life on the forum
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 1,855
Birmingham
|
its not pressure its airflow But surely airflow must be related to pressure some how?
|
|
|
Re: Moving the AFM
[Re: Genic]
#457379
15/10/2007 04:25
15/10/2007 04:25
|
karlothen
Unregistered
|
karlothen
Unregistered
|
Karl , the air flow would be the same before and after the turbo, just one is sucking and the other is blowing?? Yeah one side is pressurized the other isnt as much so. Ross Ahhhhh, but surely, if you have for example, 1.2 bar boost on one side, there must be 1.2 bar of vacuum on the other side? Ben (Where are all the physicists when you need em?) Not quite I think, there would be more pressure pushing the air into the engine, than sucking it through the filter i can see where your coming from, but there would be an equal rate and volume of air "pre turbo" and if the air post turbo is being displaced at xxx then the area pre turbo must be replaced at an equal rate......don't you just love gravity 
|
|
|
Re: Moving the AFM
[Re: benje]
#457380
15/10/2007 04:26
15/10/2007 04:26
|
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 1,855 Birmingham
benje
My life on the forum
|
My life on the forum
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 1,855
Birmingham
|
When I wake up in the morning, this will all be solved and will be in simple english I understand!  Ben Right I've just got my old A Level physics book out. I'm going to where I find my best ideas (the toilet) and will return with some important formulae!
Last edited by benje2; 15/10/2007 04:27. Reason: Going to think
|
|
|
Re: Moving the AFM
[Re: benje]
#457382
15/10/2007 04:26
15/10/2007 04:26
|
karlothen
Unregistered
|
karlothen
Unregistered
|
its not pressure its airflow But surely airflow must be related to pressure some how? yes, increase the pressure and the flow rate will be faster
|
|
|
Re: Moving the AFM
[Re: ]
#457383
15/10/2007 04:27
15/10/2007 04:27
|
karlothen
Unregistered
|
karlothen
Unregistered
|
yeah i knew i could make 100 posts, if i talked about some thing i don't know LOL 
|
|
|
Re: Moving the AFM
[Re: ]
#457389
15/10/2007 04:31
15/10/2007 04:31
|
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,618 Oswestry
Genic
OP
My life on the forum
|
OP
My life on the forum
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,618
Oswestry
|
its not pressure its airflow But surely airflow must be related to pressure some how? yes, increase the pressure and the flow rate will be faster but the quantity the same??
|
|
|
Re: Moving the AFM
[Re: Genic]
#457392
15/10/2007 04:34
15/10/2007 04:34
|
h2ypr
Unregistered
|
h2ypr
Unregistered
|
Yeah i see what ya mean about pressure genic. Im still thinking reaction time would be down. Regardless of mapping, the ecu would still take longer to detect a change in air flow.
Ross
|
|
|
Re: Moving the AFM
[Re: ]
#457399
15/10/2007 04:41
15/10/2007 04:41
|
MattW
Unregistered
|
MattW
Unregistered
|
As the boost pressure is increasing, the air flow will be faster going into the turbo than by the time it reaches the engine. Thats what causes the pressure to rise. Then when the dump valve opens it levels it all out again. Also, IIRC the AFM shouldnt be too close to the turbo, but I've forgotten why 
|
|
|
|