|
|
|
1 registered members (Devaman),
3,836
guests, and 7
spiders. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Forums48
Topics103,725
Posts1,170,168
Members1,666
| |
Most Online39,516 Apr 16th, 2026
|
|
|
Re: 16VT vs 20VT handling
[Re: ]
#994153
03/03/2010 22:15
03/03/2010 22:15
|
symonh2000
Unregistered
|
symonh2000
Unregistered
|
From this thread I have decided. I want a 16VT that has been fitted with a 20VT engine. That way I can have the superior handling of the 16VT with the 20VT sound and fuel economy.
|
|
|
Re: 16VT vs 20VT handling
[Re: ]
#998985
11/03/2010 17:26
11/03/2010 17:26
|
LiamM
Unregistered
|
LiamM
Unregistered
|
I'm building a 20VT Coupe track car at the moment, the thing that I need to sort most at the moment is the gearing, is the gearbox from the Alfa V6 compatable? I'm looking at the posibility of fitting the final drive from a 3.0V6 166 to bring down the ratios. Being off boost at 3000rpm at the exit of a corner sucks ass. Anyhoo... link to my project: http://www.octane.ie/forum/showthread.php?t=28185 Liam
Last edited by LiamM; 11/03/2010 17:30.
|
|
|
Re: 16VT vs 20VT handling
[Re: ]
#998994
11/03/2010 17:39
11/03/2010 17:39
|
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 5,408 Essex
Trappy
Club member 7306
|
Club member 7306
Forum is my life
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 5,408
Essex
|
Being off boost at 3000rpm at the exit of a corner sucks ass
Tried changing down a gear? 
F****** b****** thing...
|
|
|
Re: 16VT vs 20VT handling
[Re: Trappy]
#998998
11/03/2010 17:47
11/03/2010 17:47
|
LiamM
Unregistered
|
LiamM
Unregistered
|
eeeh yes 
Last edited by LiamM; 11/03/2010 17:48.
|
|
|
Re: 16VT vs 20VT handling
[Re: ]
#999040
11/03/2010 18:46
11/03/2010 18:46
|
Mrs_LickyL
Unregistered
|
Mrs_LickyL
Unregistered
|
From this thread I have decided. I want a 16VT that has been fitted with a 20VT engine. That way I can have the superior handling of the 16VT with the 20VT sound and fuel economy. The reason why the 16VT handles better is because the engine is lighter.
|
|
|
Re: 16VT vs 20VT handling
[Re: Jimbo]
#999074
11/03/2010 19:28
11/03/2010 19:28
|
flyingcustard
Unregistered
|
flyingcustard
Unregistered
|
I have driven both and find the 20vt superior,although some say a 16vt has a lsd it drives like it hs`nt! I was in a 60k original with standard power 195bhp and it span up in the dry coming out of a corner which the 20vt would have handled better. I believe lighter is better but the extra weight pushing the tyres into the road and the lsd on the 20vt makes the 20vt the winner  But i`d still like a 16vt as there getting rare now. Dave
|
|
|
Re: 16VT vs 20VT handling
[Re: Jimbo]
#999144
11/03/2010 21:20
11/03/2010 21:20
|
flyingcustard
Unregistered
|
flyingcustard
Unregistered
|
No lsd,I stand corrected  ,i knew there was some kind of mechanical help. I was just stoking the fire  I love them all  Dave
|
|
|
Re: 16VT vs 20VT handling
[Re: ]
#1000415
13/03/2010 17:52
13/03/2010 17:52
|
symonh2000
Unregistered
|
symonh2000
Unregistered
|
From this thread I have decided. I want a 16VT that has been fitted with a 20VT engine. That way I can have the superior handling of the 16VT with the 20VT sound and fuel economy. The reason why the 16VT handles better is because the engine is lighter. I was joking. 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|